Oh please more lip service, that is all religion is good for, oh and
taking others peoples money (after taking a slice for themselves) some of it might go to needy people.
Not exact matches
Take notice: There's no reason to sink your life and
money — and
other people's — into a black hole when the warning signs are clearly posted.
I'm not cavalier about
other people's
money or jobs, but here that doesn't qualify as risk, which is weird because in many, many countries, quitting your job and starting a company and
taking money from someone and losing it is a big, big no - no.
On the
other hand, although
people think of ADP as a payroll company, they make a lot of
money by
taking that core payroll business and upselling clients on all of this
other stuff,» Conrad says.
«Because the only
other way you can get extra
money to go in, if you wanted the same number of
people, the same kind of teaching, would be to
take it from working
people through their taxes.
National Press Club president Thomas Burr asked Thiel if what happened to Gawker could happen to
other news publications: «Could wealthy, powerful
people seek revenge against a news organization because of something they didn't like and use their influence and
money to
take them out?»
Funny thing is, they
took those risks with
other people's
money.
On the
other hand, «If
people want me to shut up and
take my
money, I'm fine with that as well.»
If the online publication merely pursues the editorial path
taken by
others and publishes content that has already been well discussed, that's called a blog and it might not earn any
money because
people won't pay for it.
Before you start
taking other people's
money, figure out if you really have something.
Among
other things, it needs to create — and enforce — mechanisms for businesses that rely on gig workers to put
money into a central pot, which can then be used to fund portable health insurance, pensions, and
other benefits that
people can
take with them from job to job.
This means
people can
take their fiat
money and exchange it for this internet
money or this bitcoin or any
other crypto coin that we're talking about.
Students at the Florida school where 17
people died last week said Sunday they will organize nationwide marches for gun control next month and try to create a «badge of shame» for politicians who
take money from the National Rifle Association and
other gun rights groups.
«Even if
people buy back stock, that is
money that goes back into the economy that lets investors
take that
money and allocate it to
other things,» Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin argued at a late - February Chamber of Commerce event.
Erlend: I got this email from an ex-girlfriend the
other day and she said im tired of making all the
people rich, and I replied that I said well, if you want to make more
money, you are going to add more value, you got to help more
people and a lot of
people do not understand that about business that like
people that are like yourself that are having income streams and
money and do not understand that like that you are making this
money because you are providing value in the world.so what are some of the steps that
people can
take to move forwards?
Consider too, whether there are opportunities for you to make
money grocery shopping for neighbors and
taking seniors to doctor's appointments, or
taking other people's kids to their after - school activities.
Trump proposes to use his power to line the pockets of steel and aluminum companies and workers, who number less than 150,000, with
money taken from hundreds of millions of
other people.
But a lot of it does
take the form of anecdotes — stories of
other people and how they managed their own
money.
Luke 6 But he did not say we should
take other peoples»
money and give to the poor.
Jesus, who was nailed on the cross after feeding five thousand
other people from out of his ass, walking on water, bringing back a boy they KNEW was dead because he was rotting and shouting down every single saduccee and pharisee for praising their white - washed selves and holding salvation from the masses, who never
took money for himself, who historically KNOWINGLY gave his life for the rest of humanity,... «did it for the good economic standing?»
When Santorum couldn't admit he said he didn't want to improve black
people's lives by giving them
other people's
money, even though the tape recording,
taken together with the context of what he was saying, clearly shows that he said black, then that's dishonesty, that's lying, something that his christian faith should have informed him about.
The Cuban
people, they fear, would become cheap labor for the Yanqui capitalists, with the regime
taking the
money and paying off workers with soap, toothpaste, and
other necessities in short supply.
The truth is that he was an entrepreneur who
took one financial risk after another, using
other people's
money, and who maintained a secrecy that was designed to keep any potential competitors from gleaning his ideas.
The «need» to be noticed, loved, and treated kindly is a universal need, I think, and even when we do not have the
money or the resources to «buy stuff» for
people, we can still
take notice of
others, and speak to them kindly, showing them the dignity and honor they deserve.
Today an observer of the Western Catholic Church would note that it is perhaps best known for its campaigning for the state to
take money through taxation from one group of
people and distribute it through large bureaucracies to
other groups of
people — an act which is very far from the love, concern, compassion and sacrifice that are the hallmarks of charity.
Instead, we have no choice who gives how much — the government
takes money under the guise of being compassionate, but lawmakers can not show compassion by being generous with
other people's
money.
Economy tanked —
people stopped giving — pastor
took money from earmarked building fund for
other uses — disillusionment set in — lots left - but many stayed??
I tell my son all the time» do not count
other people's
money, make your own» CM Punk is
taking advantage of an opportunity.
But the crux of the issue is that to award these
people with more
money, you have to
take money away from
others.
I'm so sick of
people telling those of us who are disgruntled fans to relax and give this club time to correct itself... for anyone who believes that
taking a wait - and - see approach is appropriate at this juncture they should
take a good long look at themselves in the mirror because they are a big part of the problem... no
other «big» club's fans would stand for this shit for nearly as long as we have... think about it, we've witnessed a changing of the guard at every major club in England, Spain, France and Germany in the last several years because those «big» clubs failed to live up to expectations (Barcelona, Real Madrid, Bayern, PSG, Chelsea, ManU, ManCity etc...)... for some reason, many fans have become as fragile as our current manager, believing that there couldn't possibly be a suitable replacement, even though everyone of these clubs have found multiple replacements and still achieved far more than our club... this mindset has been created by an organization that has been milking it's fans, telling countless lies (no world class players available) and lowering expectations every since they rolled out the biggest lie of all: that we couldn't spend because of the new stadium but once it was paid off we could compete with any team in the world... this organization is rotting from the inside out and if we don't demand that those in charge put soccer first this despicable behaviour won't end with Wenger's ridiculous 2 year contract... I think the real fear isn't that a suitable replacement doesn't exist, but that this organization is so
money hungry and poorly mismanaged that we will sink even lower by choosing our next coach the same way they choose our players, on the cheap... even so, we need to see what mustache will do if left to his own devices so he will have to show his true colours... only then can we purge this club and start anew
I believe Arsene and his whole coaching management staff has had there time an should honourably leave.Please GOONERS sacrifice your support for the present teams chosen and if personally required make it known we are NOT happy / satisfied with of how the club is handled.There is NO growth and half the players are not premier league standard.looking at the top 6 clubs.Somebody got to
take the fall and it is not Kroenkie as we seen the
money was spent.We buying where we had a little strength and where we really required (defensive) for a long time faith is put in
people like Calum, Mustafi, bellerin, Holding etc.. I feel for El Nenny who is hardworking with the wrong chemistry.The
other 5 top clubs will never
take these players in there premier side.
they deff waste
money bringing him in cause he's not a draw and is minimal on talent,
take that out of
other people's salary and in effect make them cut corners elsewhere, and this shooting strategy ends up biting them in the ass now because of it.
It's not just the players it's the whole club it's all out
money at Arsenal Monaco fans all over the ground the
other evening laughing and
taking the p At any
other ground it wouldn't happen, but the gound is full of white collar
people who don't see that as an issue, this site is full of Spurs fans who want Wenger to stay, that way they have a chance of finishing above us
The Sports Betting Marketplace lets
people take a look at the percentage of bets and
money placed on the Super Bowl and
other major sporting events in one spot.
If you are going to
take other people's
money, you get their judgments along with.
We split everything, time with our kids 50/50 no matter what,
money, and NEVER put shit on the
other person, when you split, you cared about them... a little respect...
people take sides, its human nature, sure confide in your friends, but like it or not you still have to work hard on bringing up your kids, and you need each
other to do it.
If you want to
take my tax
money to feed
other peoples» kids, then it's going to be no - frills basic nutrition.
Why is it that poor
people are always gone to first to
take money from them to pay for
other government concerns.
There is a deep and fundamental difference between government giving someone
other people's
money, and govenment
taking less of their own
money, having nothing to do with semantic games of calling both «welfare».
In 2004, the Howard Dean campaign made electoral history by harnessing the power of the internet to raise more than any
other Democratic contender: more than $ 25m raised, largely in small -
money donations averaging $ 80 — a marked contrast to the usual way of doing things, which involves raising titanic sums from rich
people whom you then owe a lot of favours to, whether or not you
take office.
To waste billions on a full replacement of Trident is to
take money away from
other defence and social priorities, threatening members of the armed forces and the British
people at large.
«There are
other ways to make
money than to
take low - income
people who have stayed on the waterfront.
But they didn't force those banks to
take massive risks with
other people's
money.
Common Cause executive director Susan Lerner said that «any rational
person doesn't believe these things happen in isolation,» and said there are «inherent conflicts of interest, either in campaign contributions and
taking other money from entities who want something from state government.»
True, George Osborne didn't sound desperately sympathetic to the plight of credit crunch victims when he said on Newsnight last week: «Well look, no one
takes pleasure from
people making
money out of the misery of
others, but that is a function of capitalist markets.»
Congressman Chris Collins and the three
other members who supported this unfair and unequal plan voted to
take money from their constituents and send it to corporations and wealthy
people in
other states.
In
other words, what
money gives with one hand — access to pleasurable experience — it
takes away with the
other by robbing
people of the ability to appreciate simple joys.
Other people are making
money,
taking petroleum jobs, leasing oil sites and selling freshwater needed to make fracking fluid and maintain the active wells.
It is also important to note that most
people who
take part in the Challenge are also distributors who earn
money and
other incentives when
people purchase products through them, so these reports have the possibility of being a bit biased.
According to the study, users asking
others for
money are almost always a part of a criminal organization that creates fake profiles in the hopes of
taking advantage of single
people.