Sentences with phrase «talented players do»

Our most talented players don't fit this mould unfortunately.

And what talented players did he let go that you would have kept?

Being a talented player doesn't make you a good pundit tv companies and newspapers need to take note and stop employing people based on there playing careers.

Not exact matches

The Patriots are notoriously willing to ship off talented players due for big pay days for future assets — they've done so with Jamie Collins and Chandler Jones in the past.

Most duluthians do not like or go near this place... A friend of mine is one of the most talented piano players in the world, he was tossed because he wanted to play in other churches..

that Deschamps doesn't consider him to be talented enough or «good enough», it is still not the final verdict on the player.

I believe Chucky can do «more with less» in terms of talent meaning, he can get a higher level of performance out of «less talented» players than he could from Diva's (for lack of better terminology)........

How many times has Al taken a burner that didn't pan out over obviously more talented players (since 1983, ok?)?

Canadian stars like Joey Votto didn't participate, and while Canadian baseball players are talented in their own right, it's harder for them to hide that kind of loss that teams like the U.S. or Dominican Republic could shrug off thanks to depth.

Yes but it needed to be done, whilst it can be argued whether he would be able to produce the same performances he does now in 4 years time, the whole idea i would presume would be to let the younger midfielders learn from such a talented individual now with the eventual hope that they would be able to surpass or perhaps match his ability, plus its always a good thing to have experienced players of such calibre around the squad, like barca with Xavi he may not be able to perform to the level he was in his heyday, but every once an again produces a moment of magic when you need it on account of the experience.

But I think most of them do realise that he's a very talented lad, and if he could get his act together he would be a superb all round player.

We singed a talented player for a big fee (for our standards) but he does not quite fit our biggest need.

If we start this season with those two in our starting 11 it will be a clear sign from this organization that nothing has changed and that we will never get it right until both Kroenke and Wenger are gone... neither one of these players should still be with our club at this point because they represent the settling half - measures that have plagued this team for a number of years... this is what I call the «no man's land» of the soccer world, where teams don't have enough talented young players, unlike a Monaco or Dortmund, because they have lost the plot from an organizational standpoint... they are so reliant on one individual to run the whole operation that their once relevant scouting department has become so antiquated that it can no longer find those hidden gems it once had... furthermore, when you leave all decision - making to a manager who despises any dissenting opinions, your management team becomes little more than a stagnant group of «yes men» and no new ideas emerge... so instead of developing a team with the qualities necessary to excel in a particular system, you continually make half - brain purchases year after year to stifle dissent from the ticket - buying public, then try desperately to finagle together a lineup regardless of what would make positional sense... have you ever heard of a team who plays players out of position so often... of course not because that manager would likely be fired and never work for a team of any consequence ever again

as for me ozil is a talented and skilful player but having only that is not enough to win the ever getting stronger premier leage teams, he has to train hard for endurance and be a fighter, he has to come back and press on the opponent defense and even midfieldes to disposes the ball when arsenal loose the ball and go back fast attacking like iwobi and welbeck are doing.

I, DO NOT believe in the Chelsea, Cty system of just paying fortunes for 27/32 year old players, who will then need to be replaced in a few years, whereas the talented youth are sold off.

I did see a lot of Bo on the diamond, and I've never seen a more talented player.

Very talented players were never given their best environment that complimented their talents like Wenger had managed to do with the Invincibles of 2003/04.

Like I said before, if you want to be solid and win the league, you don't extend Mertesacker or Arteta or even Rosicky (one of my favourite player)... You get fresh talented (world class possibly) players for a charge...

Honestly, sometimes I talk crap about Welbeck — like he really can appear stupid and profligate on the pitch every now and then — but the frank truth is that Danny Welbeck is a very, very talented player and I do seriously pray that everything clicks for him soon.

You find players you considered talented going into the draft that did not pan out in other situations and teams and grab them for little to nothing or even nothing.

I do like the comment about it being an «organizational decision,» because I've always maintained them letting Bennett walk was more of a reflection on ex-Bucs head coach Greg Schiano not understanding how to deal with grown men who have opinions, even his most talented players.

And they did so without dealing away their most talented young players, too, meaning they've managed to match their closest rivals, the Red Sox, in more ways than just regular season record.

Dream summer: no injuries; get rid of a few players not in the picture; trade Szczesny for Lloris or Cech; find a talented young CB (none of the ones we are linked to excite me much except Howedes and Varane, and I don't like our odds on them — also unnecessary unless we get rid of one or Chambers isn't going to play there); Kongdobia or Schniederlin (if an offer of 35 + mil comes in for WIlshere, sell and buy BOTH); Lacazette (Dybala looks great, but he is not a great goalscorer and I believe Arsene would turn him into a winger primarily — so, I'd still get him, but not as high a priority as the rest).

The one - and - done big man didn't even start for Gonzaga but he was their most talented player and he was awesome on a per - minute basis.

The signings of big names like Mesut Ozil and Alexis Sanchez are the start of that, but now they need an elite manager to lead this group of talented players who can do so much better.

«But # 15million doesn't sound like a lot of money for a talented, young, English player with great potential who is playing really, really well in the Premier League at the moment and who is scoring goals.

What Truly matters in the NBA w / these young supremely talented athletes is Culture — can your coach get them to Buy in to what he wants to accomplish or does the locker room fall apart w / disgruntled players & family members leaking to the press setting off a negative feedback loop that spirals out of control

Then reality happened and it became apparent that «throw a bunch of talented players onto the same roster and expect them to perform either the same or better than they did apart» doesn't quite work as it might seem.

Strong's gamble on talented youth, booting a huge number of existing players when he arrived, did not pay off.

A talented young player who after two years progressing through the ranks at Anfield really wants to show what he can do.

Stopping everything and letting the coach drag a marker over a dry - erase board for three minutes because the most gifted and talented basketball players on the planet don't know what to do.»

Ozil when not making great passes will always disappoint, he does not offer a goal threat, which will only allows the defenders to sit off and wait for him to try and pass to the forward runners (for such a talented player how much fouls does he get us in dangerous areas)

We don't desperately need a player in any position but for purposes of width and preparing for emergencies we require at least two or three talented players who can act as understudy so that they can take over in the future.

They'd know what some GMs preferred over what they didn't, but Brooks has been incredulous that teams would overdraft a QB with more talented defensive or skill position players on the board.

Agree his first touch is not great, But what he does is run his nuts off to create space for our other more talented players.

A manager plays a great role but if they player isn't already talented enough to score many goals what can he do?

I realy hope this transfer season we buy top players becouse if we don't do well I fear some of our talented players will leave

We were never going to win with Spalletti this year, and I'm happy to see us cultivating talented youth players we actually own (until we don't — cuz pluzvalenza)!

We are a talented side but just don't have enough players with the right mentality.

Talented players, but maybe missing that special striker up top, which certain other countries do have a couple of.

Doesn't matter how mediocre PSG have been, they have a good home record in UCL, and a ton of talented players who can make things happen on their own.

But we do nt have to be like that as well.Especially if we have a huge squad with so many talented players.

I feel Theo is a skilful and talented player as I do with Giroud BUT again I don't think Theo is versatile or Physical enough to be THAT player we need.

sorry but your ranting and post does not even make the slightes bit of sense... wenger and the scouts probably keep watching hundreds to thousands of players and youth players and from them there are probably hundreds of talented youth players but wenger obviously cant buy every single one, there are and were soooo many young players who were dubbed «the next blabla» and how many of them succeeded?

We don't care about Wilshere being more talented because Ramsey is the better player for the TEAM, he scores more, assists more and is an all round better player for the team dynamic than Wilshere!

Why do we continue with players that are either under talented for the expected standard of the club or unlikely to ever play a full season due to innate injury problems?

so let me begin: - draxler is a talented dude but right now i care muuuuuch more about the efficiency and return and walcott i statswise (only goals / assists) about x times more proficient than draxler - barkley is a worse player than wilshere, do nt know why you would want him over wilshere - okay i give you that isco over ramsey - why are you including dybala, he isnt not even a similar player to the others or a fair comparison (not the same position, price class etc..)

Some fans treatment of Iwobi has been shocking in the extreme and u nustifiable.He is a very talented young player who is still learning his trade.He lacks composure in the business end of the pitch but he has the potential to be a fine box to box midfielder.The fact that Arsenal continue to ship goals has precious little to do with Iwobi.In this connection the fault lies with our experienced players like Cech, Mustafi and last but not least Xhaka.It's time for fans to get behind Iwobi who, despite his failings gives 100 % every match.

If Xavi (one of the world's greatest mids) compliments your style of player, and under respect says he does not» play the English way» «you deff talented.

the analysis from barton is unreasonable and immature.messi scored from open play bcos he has suarez and neymar to support them who are as talented and EXPERIENCED.while chamberlain and some players do nt hav that experience or lacks form right now.the player chamberlain wa when he was signed, scoring spectacular goals and giving nice crosses, but now his form has been - do nt know wheter its bcos of low motivation levels or lack of confidence.so if sanchez had players as good as himself to support him in attack, then u will see that hes not far or i may even claim he is on same level asmsn..