Sentences with phrase «talk about glaciers»

How dare they talk about glaciers in the 1850's (um, see Skeptical Science), or that «impacts claimed by the IPCC to be likely in the distant future are claimed to be already evident.»

These days, there is a lot of talk about the glaciers melting due to global warming.

On the walk your guide will talk about glaciers, mountain building and the New Zealand climate.

One was talking about glaciers melting, another about tropical forests in trouble.

Not exact matches

His session allowed him to talk about how human climate change in national parks is melting glaciers, raising sea level, killing trees, and causing other impacts.

Nine - year - old Jairus Patterson correctly responds that he thinks it's about how glaciers move because the passage talks a lot about how many feet glaciers can move per day.

We talk about ice melter a lot and felt it was only right to address the ice melt of the glaciers.

We're not talking about your hotel room or expedition ship, but the mountains, national parks, ice cliffs and glaciers aren't exactly Wi - Fi friendly.

She did take us over for a look at the face of the glacier (which you can only get a good look at in a boat) and talked about a bit of history.

However, the idea is simple, and I've talked about this much in many presentations this winter: Take the amount of ice you need to get rid of from Greenland to raise sea level 2 m in the next century, reduce it by your best estimate of the amount that would be removed by surface mass balance losses, and try to push the rest out of the aggregate cross-sectional area of Greenland's marine - based outlet glaciers.

Oerlemans's reconstruction of global temperatures (largely from mid latitude glaciers) is entirely independent of the much talked about temperature records from other paleoclimate proxy data (e.g. Moberg and others, Mann and others, Crowley and others).

Striking how this blog talks about polar bears, hurricanes, melting glaciers, melting sea ice, disappearing frogs, intelligence estimates, the snows of Kilimanjaro, drought, famine, insect infestations, too much rain, lack of rain, and who knows what else, and links it all to AGW.

We are talking about a retreat that is unstoppable because we think we have enough evidence to say that these glaciers will keep retreating for decades and even centuries to come....

As long as were talking about the cryosphere, many (if not most) of the world's mountain glaciers will be gone in 100 years:

We're not talking about day trading here, we're talking climate and long range trends like a steady decline in sea ice over decades, shrinking glaciers world - wide, deforestation, etc..

How can we talk to our readers about glacial melt when the glaciers are actually growing in the Karkoram region of Pakistan?

Penn State professor Sridhar Anandakrishnan talks about the importance of studying «huge» Thwaites glacier.

Now you say glaciers and talk about Greenland and Antarctica.

«In recent years many people have talked about «the melting glaciers of Kilimanjaro».

By the way, since we are talking about retreating ice, here is a picture showing the retreat of the Glaciers at beautiful Glacier Bay, Alaska.

The problem is in the difference between constructive criticism («hey, I think X is a better way to describe process Y than what the IPCC said... I'm going to publish a paper saying so, and give talks about it, and maybe it X will be reflected in the next IPCC report) to destructive criticism («hey, one sentence in one chapter in WGII was wrong about the melting of Himalayan glaciers.

And if you are not sure about the benefits of mitigation — I recently went to a talk by an Indian scientist who spoke about the melting Himalayan glaciers and his fear that, if we don't stabilise the atmosphere, they will go and stop feeding those major rivers that provide water and make agriculture possible for 1 - 2 billion people.