«
Talk about its people and its products.»
«Before the housewares show —
talk about people you know — a good friend of ours was at a shiva call and met this gentlemen,» Och said.
While some may easily dismiss
any talk about a person's «energy» as being too New Age, I believe that attitude and demeanor contributes to overall success.
Donald just dissed hackers,
talking about people in their bedrooms weighing 400 pounds.
«Even at 30, we're
talking about people who rarely die.»
«We're
talking about people who are refusing to pay their debts, and a method to assist businesses to get them to do that.»
«Are we sure we're talking about a bunch of people leaving the wirehouses or are
we talking about people leaving the captive insurance environment,» Roame asked.
I was actually taking a look at a book by Philip Kotler, Kellogg on Marketing, where he was
talking about people will buy from you based on the fact that they can self - identify you.
I have to be very careful at all times to not
talk about people behind their backs and I wish I could say this was easy.
Romans 1,2, & 3 if you'll read them again, is
talking about people engaging in sex just for the sake of engaging in sex and I agree with it 100 %.
I have some teaching tapes where
he talks about people trying to teach that «gay is okay»... and he is nixing that.
I love seeing christians
talk about people hating on religion, as if nothing bad has ever come from it.
He was
talking about people who deny evolution.
The Vatican is NOT
talking about those people who are the majority of Catholic religious.
I guess you missed the part where
it talks about people seeking help (which is a far cry from people seeking someone's life to control as you seem to think the article is about).
He was
talking about people.
If you look at the same passage where St. Paul
talks about people being «androgynous», he makes a direct comparison — «like the angels» — which implies that angels don't mate at all either.
The book of Mark
talks about people like the Pope (and every day hypocrites), Mark 7:6 - 8.
However, it seems to me that she tends to
talk about people she's not so fond of behind their backs.
I don't agree with Rachel much either but I think she was
talking about people predisposed to be believers in the first place.
I am not
talking about people with «narcissistic traits» or those that are «stressed under circumstances and behaving poorly.»
We go to church, we participate in leadership meetings to shape the conversations of our communities, we pray for our friends, we make meals, I write posts and articles and books about God, we wash our minivans, we set up the sprinkler for the neighbourhood kids and hand out freezies to hopeful hands, we go to work,
we talk about the people we know.
I was only
talking about people who lived before God gave the law to Moses.
we are
talking about those people who believe in that particular flavor of ANYTHING that deals with «some invisible friend who gives you special favors and hurts the people you don't like.»
I'm
talking about people who have a reverent awe of marriage as one of God's most cherished creations.
One sure sign that this has begun to happen will be a shift in informal out - of - classroom conversations from talk about course work, or even from
talk about people in the school, to talk about the school itself.
You said: «I am amazed at all the atheists who feel compelled to
talk about a person they think doesn't exist.
Talking about people not believing in God.
I am amazed at all the atheists who feel compelled to
talk about a person they think doesn't exist.
Those shows use sci - fi to
talk about people.
And, the first part of 1 Corinthians 9 tells us that Paul is
talking about people who travel to proclaim the gospel, i.e., apostles.
I'm not
talking about that person who goes to church every Sunday and read's out of the Bible every week, or every day for that matter.
Talk about people who tell other people how to run their lives!!
put the word «conservative» in front of «Christians», and you are no longer
talking about people who actually follow in Christ's footsteps.
This article is
talking about people not knowing anything about religion, not the Bible.
We talk about a person's faith in politics because we're all afraid of the faithful that believe differently then us.
When theologians and lawyers were
talking about persons, they're talking personas.
True, though Jesus has been the most widely
talked about person in the history of mankind heard by the poor and the kings and the wealthiest alike probably didn't exist.
Insofar as we are
talking about people going into parish ministry, there are obvious topics that have to do with leadership in the parish that need to be engaged.
He's
talking about people who claim to know Him but really don't because they are not obedient to Him.
or «What a loving spirit he has» we don't mean the Holy Spirit, but are
talking about the person's character or nature which makes them who they are.
However, Brunner acknowledges that reason may
talk about persons at both levels.
But I remember a missinary
talking about these people who translated that word as throat.
Sanders
talks about people's real economic problems.
The Bible never
talks about a person being removed from the body of Christ or losing the seal of the Holy Spirit.
Yet the Bible never
talks about a person being unborn again after they are saved.
The passage
talks about the people of God so the question, in view of your post... are those people of God who do not enter saved?
We're
talking about people with varying degrees of health, quality of life, education, opportunity, hope, capacity to love, time, and passion.
When we study Matthew 7:16 in context, we see that Jesus is not
talking about a person's works, but about their words.
If
it talked about the people being unworthy — so that you have to become worthy before you can come to the Lord's Supper — then that would be a different religion.