Sentences with phrase «talk shows they watch»

Not exact matches

Twitch is primarily used to watch video gameplay but also hosts many other types of live streams, including talk shows and cooking shows.

Twitch is primarily used to watch video gameplay but hosts many other types of live streams, including talk shows and cooking shows.

Watch my findings: Get your waffles and syrup at WiredWaffles.com, like»em on Facebook and be sure to watch the Small Businesses Do It Better Show this Tuesday at 7p / 10e where I'll talk about the waffles, Watch my findings: Get your waffles and syrup at WiredWaffles.com, like»em on Facebook and be sure to watch the Small Businesses Do It Better Show this Tuesday at 7p / 10e where I'll talk about the waffles, watch the Small Businesses Do It Better Show this Tuesday at 7p / 10e where I'll talk about the waffles, live!

Using its liking and sharing features, Facebook is already providing recommendations of live and recorded content in categories like «Most Talked About,» «What's Making People Laugh,» and «Shows Your Friends Are Watching.»

Asking an average citizen to differentiate between «big government» and «big business» is like asking a toddler watching a puppet show whether the puppets are talking or whether it's the puppeteers.

I've seen their posts, the memes they've shared, watched them gush over the outfits the all - star cast wore to the premiere, and even giggled as they talked about how they would dress up for the opening day showing we all preordered tickets for.

«Forty - five minutes before the Chanel show was due to start, Karl Lagerfeld himself arrived at the Apple Watch preview, and sat down with Anna Wintour to try on a watch and be talked through the functionality by Ive and NeWatch preview, and sat down with Anna Wintour to try on a watch and be talked through the functionality by Ive and Newatch and be talked through the functionality by Ive and Newson.

I stopped watching the Sunday morning talk shows, stopped reading political news, stopped paying attention.

You can not pick up a newspaper, turn on the news, watch a TV show or talk with other people these days without regularly hearing the bad stuff that happens in the world.

You don't have to watch the conservative talk shows to get a different perspective on the news.

When we watch and talk about television shows and movies this way, we treat them as if they were merely puzzles to be put together, mysteries to be solved, data to be sorted.

Granted, the believers are perfectly happy relying on scientists and science to — I don't know — talk to people around the world instantaneously via this comment board, and then get in their cars, and fly in planes, and use electricity, and watch TV — all of those things based on science, and yet, when someone points out that scientists have mapped the human genome and other primates and can show, irrefutably, where the different primate families branched off — well, no, no no!

but I guess watching the kardashians, or jersey shore is alot more educational, If I was forced to watch any of that junk, I would choose this one, at least they can get your attention without having to get naked and spread their legs all over town just to make a buck... these people got over 1 Million watching and talking about the show without showing their skin, just by showing how they actually live in a country where some IDIOTS are trying to teach us if someone looks different or acts different than us we should be scared of them and they are out to kill us.

LeRoy - have you ever watched a conservative talk show?

My weekly plan is just watch the show and then act like you're sitting here on my couch with me so we can debrief the show and talk about our theories and generally geek out together.

I often listen and watch talk show host / comedian Bill Maher who consistently offers up highly offensive anecdotes against religious groups, especially Bible believing christians.

Because watching a character wandering around talking to himself isn't exactly a recipe for MacGruber - style hilarity, audiences may be in for some surprises; especially considering the show was originally pitched with the concept of being about two surviving members of humanity.

While watching a TV show together can be fun, it's also important to create space to talk in order to continue to learn about each other.

Then, when the show starts, all the boys (plus me) go downstairs to watch 24 while all the ladies stay upstairs and drink tea and talk.

When I first watched the show I was amazed by this popcorn for dinner idea, and then I started to see so many more blogs and twitter friends talking about popcorn for dinner.

First of all, there I was watching The Daily Show and Jon Stewart was talking about veganism.

We ate some pretty delicious food, drank some good wine, walked around, talked, laughed, watched the city's annual air show, went to the fair, to the beach, to the Farmers» market, to the baseball game.

I think I may have to start watching that show... everyone keeps talking about how amazing it is.

I stayed up late and watched my favourite talk show, The Ttalk show, The TalkTalk.

I love the stuff and was watching a show on food network where Iron Chef Michael Symon was talking about his favorite guacamole which sounds much like this one only they added feta?

«At the end of it, while we were talking, he was like, «OK, watch the halftime show.

i'm talking about sky sport transfer news as they are reliable, have never watched any pundit show apart from very few carragher and neville.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I don't like how you frisco talked about Wilshere.What I've come to realize is that we always seem not to criticize some players.Let me give you examples.They are: Monreal, Cazorla, Ozil etc. I've watched several matches where Cazorls has not been efficient and at Arsenal lack of efficiency from players and inconsistency is the norm of the day for this club.Wilshere has not yet fulfilled his potential but the guy I admire him for his fighting spirit and he always shows signs of the old Wilshere when he gets a run of games.I expect Wilshere to be better than Ozil and Cazorla when fulfills his potential.When you watch him when he was 16 and compare to other players at the same age who are now stars he was far far better.The guy's potential is really really huge and of there's anyone Arsene must persist with then it's Jack Wilshere.He should play this week in my opinion because he looked good when he came on and we can't keeo that momentum on the vench.Arsenal fans are too interested in one player being better than the other to start.Okay well if you want me to say it like how it is then i'll say it.Ozil and Cazorla are much better than Jack Wilshere but in terms of potential Wilshere was more blessed than them.

SEE ALSO: Chelsea legend controversially advises Blues ace to seal transfer to Premier League rivals Barcelona flop could be set for exit, Premier League boss holds talk with club over potential transfer Watch: David Luiz shows he's born to play in midfield with stunning opening goal for Chelsea vs Roma

I'm not a Wenger out guy but I watched that new talk show on Arsenalfantv and I heard Tim Payton say pretty much that everyone was on board to make this a memorable transfer window but due to Wenger's indecisiveness and lack of push we lost out on the players we really need and everyone was disappointed.

Sometimes actors on the TV shows I watch look like other actors I've seen before, and I like to talk about it.

Watch they will talk more about who McGregor will fight next for the second half of the show same tired storylines, same fighters talked about over and over

In a series of experiments, Cohen, Walton, and Yeager have shown the power of what seem to be small - scale mindset interventions — watching a brief video of an older student talking about his struggles with belonging, or reading a magazine article that presents a growth - mindset perspective on brain development — to significantly improve the academic performance of students who are vulnerable to stereotype threat, including low - income students and African - American students.

Even though they have talked to other parents, read books and watched TV shows about parenting, they aren't able to change their child's behavior — and their own techniques continue to be ineffective.

Shows interest in potty related things like talking about poo - poo or pee - pee or wanting to watch you when you go to the bathroom.

Resist the temptation to use the screen as an electronic babysitter; instead, sit and watch along with her, posing questions, talking about ideas presented in the show or movie, and finding out what strikes her as most interesting.

While it may seem that a child prefers to watch a show or play on a device in the car, the post-school commute is a valuable opportunity and natural space for parents and children to think and talk together about their time apart from each other.

There are ways to help your child ease into potty training, you can watch t.v shows about it, you can talk to them about it and you can also read books to them about it.

I talk and sing to him while we watch my favorite morning talk show.

In class, we had watched segments of an ABC show, «The Home Show `, with a doctor who was talking about this little practiced parenting style, Dr. Jay Gorshow, «The Home Show `, with a doctor who was talking about this little practiced parenting style, Dr. Jay GorShow `, with a doctor who was talking about this little practiced parenting style, Dr. Jay Gordon.

There are ways to help your child ease into potty training, you can watch t.v shows about it, you can talk to Continue Reading...

Consider talking about sexuality after you've watched a show or movie together, or read a book with a non-heterosexual theme.

You watch births on TV shows and can't help but talk to the television the entire time.

And I definitely feel like I have..., I remember, before I had a baby, watching, you know like E-Online or those shows where they talk about the ladies on the red carpet and they talked positively like «Oh, well, she just had a baby so her breasts are showing it.»

You no longer can focus on reading, watching a show, talking, etc..

It's worth sticking around for the very end of the show (which you can watch here), when Stewart does a little shtick about kibitzing with the mayor, saying: «Hello, welcome to Jew talk.»

In defense of Brodsky, if you «hit back» with talking points steeped in jargon like ECR, it doesn't resonate with much of the TV - watching audience, even on a show like Liz's.

In the next group, a second student learned how to make the tools by simply watching the first subject and trying to duplicate what he or she did with no interaction at all between them; in the third group, subjects actively showed each other what they were doing but without gesturing; in the fourth group, gesturing and pointing were allowed but no talking; and in the fifth group, the «teacher» was permitted to talk to the «learner» and say whatever was necessary.

Story number 4: Older women who watch mostly talk shows and soap operas score poorly on tests of mental functioning.