Sentences with phrase «talk to other men»

Can we please NOT lower our voices when we talk to women, and get louder when we talk to other men?

Never talk to other men about his wife, because they might be more knowledgeable on the subject than he was.

Men don't talk enough, and they don't talk to other men.»

The problem I see when I talk to other men on the topic is that they all pick their own area to ignore.

As Aaron began to talk to other men dealing with depression and anxiety, he became aware of other factors that appeared to be exacerbating these problems.

Talk to other men and women who have decided to use an egg donor to have kids, and try to learn from their experiences.

Meeting and talking to other men in the class will help your partner relate and discuss what he's going through.

Male speakers laughed less than female speakers, but they still laughed 25 percent more than their listeners when they were talking to other men.

She is still talking to other men even after telling me that she loves me.

Chances are that the lady you are considering is also talking to other men, as well.

Hilarious And Sexist Dating Tips From 1938 - Do nt be conspicuous talking to other men.

Not exact matches

It allows them to talk about these things without fear of judgment from other men and to explore their senses of fashion as well as their relationships to food, wellness, and dating.

The two men were loudly talking to each other through and over the pod walls.

The 29 - year - old visited Ellen DeGeneres» syndicated talk show to discuss the harrowing experience of being at an Antioch, Tenn., Waffle House on April 22 when a man entered the restaurant with an AR - 15 rifle and opened fire, killing four patrons and injuring several others.

Flournoy said President Trump's tough talk about North Korea — which has included deriding Kim Jong Un as «Little Rocket Man» and threatening to rain «fire and fury» down on his country — made it «much more likely now that one side or the other will misread what was intended as a show of commitment or a show of force.»

In short: Trump, a man whom other countries have frequently and successfully manipulated, appears set to have personal talks with the leader of an extremely dangerous country on an issue where the stakes are literally nuclear.

Thanks man although think this way we will not have much to talk about since each rejects beliefs of the other...!

And isn't the relationship with God, and each spiritual journey going to lead us in different directions — why do we need to judge others who profess Love of God, who profess love of their fellow man, yet seem to us to act unkindly to others, how can we judge them unless we talk to them and understand them as well as God does.

One the other hand, IF he was trying to be practical in not creating too much upheaval but ultimately thought there should be no distinction between men and women in this life, it would be in the more repressive conditions that he would talk about the «proper» relationship between women and men to improve their lot as much as seemed feasible.

If I were you I would avoid these types of places as people talk about many, many topics and if this nice man and his well meaning article angered you, being around other people talking about things may be too much for you to handle.

That said: «But god did not foresee — that man would want a companion» = > «It is not good for the man to be alone» are the words used — so God did know and provided «that the snake would talk to the humans» = > «the serpent was more crafty than any other animal» - deception required capacity to deceive «that the humans would choose knowledge (and why else was that tree there)» = > It was not knowledge but knowledge of good and evil.

I find meditation, and compassion for self to be conducive to what you talk of with loving God and mankind — sometimes in mysterious, unfathomable and transcendent ways, encountering the power to open up men and women to each other and God in love peace justice and human dignity.

For all the talk of justice and of opportunities, it doesn't really help young men and women who want to marry and have families - in other words, to ensure the future of the human race in stability and affection.

On the other hand, there were other men who disagreed: Tertullian, who believed that the soul would live on forever, that the wicked would suffer misery in proportion to the righteous» reward; St. Augustine, who came up with the doctrines of Original Sin and Predestination (some would be saved, the rest would be damned); and Jerome, who would end up retranslating the Latin Bible into what would become the Latin Vulgate and would twist various scriptures that talked about eonian chastening into teaching eternal torment.

The extent of what is not open to discussion may vary considerably according to the different partners; it may, in certain cases, even be reduced to the conviction that men must talk to each other fairly and honestly.

Adam was the first man, that is if he had been God he would not have been refered to as man, also who was it then that gave him commandments as to the garden of Eden, in other words who was talking to him in the cool of the evening?

The enthusiastic outpouring of gratitude, perhaps itself not devoid of tears nor without a moving effect upon others, is a misunderstanding; for the thoughts that such a man has he certainly does not owe to another, and the nonsense he talks is all his own.

And there are still sects of this cult that secretly practice this pedo lifestyle!!!!!! And, most distressing of all, given that we're talking about someone who could become the most powerful man in the world, the Mormon church teaches that Mormons can lie if it suits their needs to impose their «religion» on others!

Thus to talk about «the spirit of man» was to say that human existence is not only a matter of mind and body, as we have represented this in our previous discussion, but is also a matter of relationship, in which there is an openness to, and a sharing in, the life of others.

A debate in which the thoughts are not expressed in the way in which they existed in the mind but in the speaking are so pointed that they may strike home in the sharpest way, and moreover without the men that are spoken to being regarded in any way present as persons; a conversation characterized by the need neither to communicate something, nor to learn something, nor to innuence someone, nor to come into connexion with someone, but solely by the desire to have one's own self - reliance confirmed by making the impression that is made, or if it has become unsteady to have it strengthened; a friendly chat in which each regards himself as absolute and legitimate and the other as relativized and questionable; a lovers» talk in which both partners alike enjoy their own glorious soul and their precious experience — what an underworld of faceless spectres of dialogue!

The seven women and men in the two inner circles were now requested to join each other in one circle, where they immediately began talking all at once and very excitedly to each other while the larger group around the room continued to listen.

Christianity teaches that this particular individual, and so every individual, whatever in other respects this individual may be, man, woman, serving - maid, minister of state, merchant, barber, student, etc. — this individual exists before God — this individual who perhaps would be vain for having once in his life talked with the King, this man who is not a little proud of living on intimate terms with that person or the other, this man exists before God, can talk with God any moment he will, sure to be heard by Him; in short, this man is invited to live on the most intimate terms with God!

What I have particularly in mind is that while there is much talk about taking Jesus as a key to the interpretation of human nature, as it is often phrased, or to the meaning of human life, or to the point of man's existential situation, there is a lamentable tendency to stop there and not to go on to talk about «the world» — by which Miss Emmet meant, I assume, the totality of things including physical nature; in other words the cosmos in its basic structure and its chief dynamic energy.

The seven men now in the inner circle were asked to talk with each other about their own reactions to what they had heard the women saying:

In «Christianity and Myth» Cobb again considers the possibility of Christian theism for the modern mind.120 The profane spirit of contemporary man finds it impossible to talk about some «reality radically different from all other reality...,» i.e., to speak mythically.

We have become way too much eyeball people as Christians assume that those who don't live according to the way they do they are unsaved, we have created this judgemental relationship which hurts peoples fellowship with God, there are no litmus tests for people that believe in Jesus, which is why we are called to not judge others, and people use James 2:14, and 1 John's verse of those who practices righteousness are righteous even though I think it's talking about earthly righteousness toward people that we as Christians should show because there is a lost world out there that needs are help and these doctrines of guilt, condemnation, anger, and judgement aren't helping in fact they are doing the opposite, just like how in James it's justification towards man.

There will be no questioning as to whether I have won men (quite on the contrary, it might well be asked whether I had any notion of having by my own efforts done the least thing toward winning them); no questioning as to whether, by the talk I have gained some earthly advantage (quite on the contrary, it might well be asked whether I had any notion of having myself done the least thing toward gaining it); no questioning about what results I have produced, or whether I may have produced no results at all, or whether loss and the sport that others made of me were the only results I have produced.

That «locker room talk» turned into a teachable moment for a man - in - the - making: make that two men - in the making, because after driving away, the second boy, seated wide - eyed in the back seat the entire time, asked my husband if he was going to «beat up» the other boy for what he said.

Young men — not just those who spend time in locker rooms — need their dads, uncles, male teachers, ministers, rabbis, and other adult men in their lives to teach them how to appreciate and talk about women.

The preacher is right everyone should be who they are... but then again the Bible does state that it is an abomination to God... But get this... before God can judge you Jesus has to judge you... the BIble says NO MAN COME TO THE FATHER BUT BY ME... we have no room to judge others or talk about them because no sin is big or small they are all the same... the only big sin is not being saved and believing in God... if we are saved and if we believe we have nothing to worry about... but again we have no room to say who is right and who is wrong because it's not our place all that we can do is pray and prayer can change things.to God... But get this... before God can judge you Jesus has to judge you... the BIble says NO MAN COME TO THE FATHER BUT BY ME... we have no room to judge others or talk about them because no sin is big or small they are all the same... the only big sin is not being saved and believing in God... if we are saved and if we believe we have nothing to worry about... but again we have no room to say who is right and who is wrong because it's not our place all that we can do is pray and prayer can change things.to judge you... the BIble says NO MAN COME TO THE FATHER BUT BY ME... we have no room to judge others or talk about them because no sin is big or small they are all the same... the only big sin is not being saved and believing in God... if we are saved and if we believe we have nothing to worry about... but again we have no room to say who is right and who is wrong because it's not our place all that we can do is pray and prayer can change things.TO THE FATHER BUT BY ME... we have no room to judge others or talk about them because no sin is big or small they are all the same... the only big sin is not being saved and believing in God... if we are saved and if we believe we have nothing to worry about... but again we have no room to say who is right and who is wrong because it's not our place all that we can do is pray and prayer can change things.to judge others or talk about them because no sin is big or small they are all the same... the only big sin is not being saved and believing in God... if we are saved and if we believe we have nothing to worry about... but again we have no room to say who is right and who is wrong because it's not our place all that we can do is pray and prayer can change things.to worry about... but again we have no room to say who is right and who is wrong because it's not our place all that we can do is pray and prayer can change things.to say who is right and who is wrong because it's not our place all that we can do is pray and prayer can change things...

This is a stupid question, as we are talking about a man not only paid His taxes, but told others to do the same.

So when we talk about selling what we possess and giving to the poor, we are talking about a daily possibility — unless, of course, we take up the beggar's bowl like the holy men of India and live day by day from what others will give us.

On Maundy Thursday, while sitting at table, Jesus considered himself a dead man and spoke of blood poured out and other subjects conventionally regarded as indelicate to table talk.

It is not necessary for me to recount why Bultmann finds this incredibility in the form; suffice it to say that he is not committed to any particular scientific world - view, although Jaspers and others have charged him with this, but is simply stating that the contemporary man does not as a matter of fact think or talk in terms of such a form.

Nor does it mean that in some respects he is divine and in other respects he is human, though theologians have sometimes talked as if that were the case: as though Jesus played a double role, appearing on the stage now as God, now as man, switching over from the one to the other.

You probably have a list of scriptures (the same ones I once used) for this purpose, but if you look at them honestly they do not mention the Bible, but rather «the law», writings of «men of old», «the Word of God», «this book», «this prophecy», «the scripture» or other specified or unspecified writing (s)-- NOT ONE says «the Bible» or can be reasonably interpreted to refer to the Protestant or Catholic canon WE moderns mean when we talk about «the Bible».

I began to wonder how wise could these leaders be if they knew they had a problem but didn't talk about it with the other men in the church, the men they trust?

It talked of how these masters were known for their wisdom and their ability to help their faithful followers survive the many invasions of the Mongols and such... because even the heathen warriors who went on to ruthlessly sack Bagdad and other great Islamic cities of the Middle East, could only respect these men and their followers for their wisdom.

By this time feelings are running high, and women and men are anxious to talk to each other.

The other day on Facebook, I saw my brother - in - law counsel his 24 - year - old son, who had overheard a white man reviling blacks and Mexicans in a bar, to ignore such talk for his own safety.