We used to ridicule those who
talked about justification by faith because that talk seemed to be an excuse for them not to take Jesus» call to discipleship seriously.
The Bible sometimes
talks about justification by faith and sometimes a final vindication by works at the final judgement.
Not exact matches
C. Which, is NOT the context of «deterrence being a
justification for punishment» that @saraswati was
talking about.
For example, he
talks about the heresies of «
justification by faith alone» (p. 237), annihilationism, hyper - preterism (p. 242), Openness of God, and Religious Inclusivism (p. 281).
But I'm not sure
about just ditching the idea of a vision that the Body has (I'm
talking local church)... I mean, although I want sometimes to ditch it, I can't find
justification in Scripture.
I don't know what Hayes is
talking about when he says he feels «uncomfortable,
about the word because it seems to me that it is so rhetorically proximate to
justifications for more war.»
We have become way too much eyeball people as Christians assume that those who don't live according to the way they do they are unsaved, we have created this judgemental relationship which hurts peoples fellowship with God, there are no litmus tests for people that believe in Jesus, which is why we are called to not judge others, and people use James 2:14, and 1 John's verse of those who practices righteousness are righteous even though I think it's
talking about earthly righteousness toward people that we as Christians should show because there is a lost world out there that needs are help and these doctrines of guilt, condemnation, anger, and judgement aren't helping in fact they are doing the opposite, just like how in James it's
justification towards man.
Highlights for me included: 1) Belcher's call in Chapter 3 to find common ground in classic / orthodox Christianity (the Apostle's Creed, the Nicene Creed, and the Athanasian Creed) which, if applied, would dramatically reduce some of the name - calling and accusations of heresy that have been most unhelpful in the discussion between the emerging and traditional camps, 2) Belcher's fabulous treatment of postmodernism and postfoundationalism in Chapter 4, where he rightly explains that when
talking about postmodernism, folks in the emerging church and the traditional church are using the same term to refer to two completely different things, and where he concludes that «a third way rejects classical foundationalism and hard postmodernism,» and 3) Belcher's fair handling of the atonement issue in Chapter 6, in which he clarifies that most emergering church leaders «are not against atonement theories and
justification, but want to see it balanced with the message of the kingdom of God.»
Didn't
talk about multiple wives either — to say that Jesus didn't
talk about subject X is NO
justification for subject X.
All the while, they're kinda
talking out of both sides of their mouth, so to speak, with their
justification of letting 88 go when washed up 82 is
talking about playing until he's 40.
When I
talk about Labour representatives forming a meritocracy, it is because that is how they see themselves, that was the
justification for doing things that way.
I
talked about this a little bit in another chapter, but lately I've been hearing this «
justification» for frightening bad behavior on the part -LSB-...]
Sure they
talk about sliders and margin
justification but they don't actually implement it showing you step - by - step how each one looks.
We
talk about indexing all the time here, but this post was a
justification one person makes for picking stocks, as he applies it to his own situation.
Could you
talk a little bit
about the
justification behind the Volcker Rule and the effect you think it's had on the market?
I've
talked about serious problems with the title I'm playing, and after publication of the article recieved messages
about how I'd judged the game unfairly simply because these issues will fixed and I shouldn't use them as a
justification for my view of the title in question.
I've said before that the price of a game doesn't affect my final opinion since pricing is always a subjective thing, so as always my closing thoughts in the next paragraph will just be
about the game, but that doesn't mean I won't
talk about the price and in this instance I just don't see the
justification for price - tag.
Theresa Duringer returns to
talk about wrestling with her
justifications of belief, scrabble board games, and her latest game Race for the Galaxy.
Despite his modesty, Doig's work has been
talked about in relation to Matisse, Monet, Turner, Delacroix, Gauguin, all with some
justification.
Show me that
justification, and then let us
talk about Myhre et al. 1998.
What subsidies are you
talking about??? Please provide
justification for your claims of a subsidy.
Kindly do not bring
justification of that here in a thread where Dr.Curry is
talking about IPCC's confidence or overconfidence levels and attributions.
Other personal topics such as
talking about the reasons for leaving your current job, overly detailed
justifications for career breaks, or badmouthing your boss also fall firmly under the «do not mention» category.
When she
talks about mutual verbal provocation [FN39] in these relationships, the echo of the
justification so commonly used by batterers, that their partners provoked them by asserting independence or failing to comply with (often unreasonable) demands, makes Johnston's account uncomfortable reading for those whose primary constituencies are perpetrators or victims of battering.
And the typical
justification for this insane collusion with psychopathology is that they're «giving the child a safe place to
talk about their feelings.»
However, then you went on to
talk about how you can justify redirecting these clients away from their Realtors because of the cost savings, and it seems as though you are going through that
justification by asking me the question above.