Sentences with phrase «talking about a group of people»

«You're talking about a group of people who have been marginalized for so long,» she says.

then The Bible talks about a group of people who he made a promise with That was Based on those rules.

We are talking about a group of people who, this year alone, remitted $ 22 billion to the Nigerian economy.

We're talking about a group of people whose hobby (or even their livelihood!)

When talking about groups of people, if one of the groups is people who have taken the Hippocratic Oath, then doctors and non-doctors make sense as categories.

I'm talking about a group of people with whom it is vital to have a good relationship if you want to succeed.

Not exact matches

A «platform» is a large, growing group of people who love you, your work or the way you talk about your topic.

He went on to talk about how important it is to have a diverse bench of leadership to ensure more sound decision - making, rather than having one person from the «diverse group» represent his or her entire population.

It's always dangerous to generalize when talking about the likes and dislikes of a large group of people.

Advertising to non-fans instead of building a fan base and then engaging them sounded like a dangerous plan at first, and I think it's very (very) important that your readers know that you're only talking about advertising to reach a highly targeted group of people (which in your case means website vistors).

What I learned from traveling around the country for a week, talking to groups of people about their careers

«What surprised me most, in a positive way, about today was that although the five risks in their own way merit a lot, they are extremely interconnected, and I love the fact that this group of people are talking about them as a cohesive group.

The Japanese owner of Uniqlo is in talks about a potential acquisition of J. Crew Group Inc., the U.S. retailer owned by TPG Capital and Leonard Green & Partners LP, two people with knowledge of the matter said Feb. 28.

«It's unmistakable that their immediate involvement has motivated a whole group of people to talk about something that otherwise has been sacrosanct,» Oliva said.

This will create an ever - expanding group of people talking to other people about your business, its sales and promotions.

The idea that a being would create the entire thing — with 400,000,000,000 galaxies, EACH with 100, 000,000,000 starts and even more planets, then sit back and wait 13,720,000,000 years for human beings to evolve on one planet so he could «love them» and send his son to Earth to talk to a nomadic group of Jews about sheep and goats in Iron Age Palestine (while ignoring the rest of the 200 million people then alive) makes no sense to us.

We talked about him and his descendants some last week and than many of them are the Asian, African and some of the Middle Eastern people groups.

Because I'll see this little group of people on Thursday night for our Bible study, and that is where we'll talk about the real stuff, show up, be disappointed and forgive, love each other a bit more every week.

You also speak as though you are certain no gay people are present and that «we evengelical Christians» are talking amonst ourself about what an entire group of people deserve in terms of full inclusion and acceptance in society and the church.

Aren't we talking about a group of pastors that had an aggregate congregation count of like 500 people?

In the book I talk about The Lasting Supper... a great group of people, many of whom fit that review's description in so many ways.

The brain abnormacy is physical and inherited, but learning as much as you can about what it is, and having a support group of people to talk to and to see as other peopl dealing with these same things, who overcame them, can «save your life», as it did mine.

society needs to stop protecting the rights of gays and lesbians and should focus on our mere extinction if we do nt repent, and hed to the words of CHRIST, we should not be spending even a minute talking about gays, bc the main story is how ignorant and stupid society has become, KNOW THIS, IF YOU REMOVE THE WORDS CHRIST FROM CHRISTMAS AND DECIDE THAT IS NO LONGER A STORY ABOUT A BABY FROM BETHLEHEN AND NOW ITS ABOUT SANTA CLAUS, AND PEOPLE ARE LEARNING TO ACCEPT OTHER RELIGIONS MOVING TO NY THEN YOU CAN EXPECT EVIL AND DISOBIENCE TO PROVAIL how can any group of people who blantenly marry in a church before GOD ALMIGHTY and demand that society accept them, have any place NEXT TO A HOLY GOD IN HEAVEN, WHO IS WITH OUT SIN, ACCEPT THEIRabout gays, bc the main story is how ignorant and stupid society has become, KNOW THIS, IF YOU REMOVE THE WORDS CHRIST FROM CHRISTMAS AND DECIDE THAT IS NO LONGER A STORY ABOUT A BABY FROM BETHLEHEN AND NOW ITS ABOUT SANTA CLAUS, AND PEOPLE ARE LEARNING TO ACCEPT OTHER RELIGIONS MOVING TO NY THEN YOU CAN EXPECT EVIL AND DISOBIENCE TO PROVAIL how can any group of people who blantenly marry in a church before GOD ALMIGHTY and demand that society accept them, have any place NEXT TO A HOLY GOD IN HEAVEN, WHO IS WITH OUT SIN, ACCEPT THEIRABOUT A BABY FROM BETHLEHEN AND NOW ITS ABOUT SANTA CLAUS, AND PEOPLE ARE LEARNING TO ACCEPT OTHER RELIGIONS MOVING TO NY THEN YOU CAN EXPECT EVIL AND DISOBIENCE TO PROVAIL how can any group of people who blantenly marry in a church before GOD ALMIGHTY and demand that society accept them, have any place NEXT TO A HOLY GOD IN HEAVEN, WHO IS WITH OUT SIN, ACCEPT THEIRABOUT SANTA CLAUS, AND PEOPLE ARE LEARNING TO ACCEPT OTHER RELIGIONS MOVING TO NY THEN YOU CAN EXPECT EVIL AND DISOBIENCE TO PROVAIL how can any group of people who blantenly marry in a church before GOD ALMIGHTY and demand that society accept them, have any place NEXT TO A HOLY GOD IN HEAVEN, WHO IS WITH OUT SIN, ACCEPT THEIPEOPLE ARE LEARNING TO ACCEPT OTHER RELIGIONS MOVING TO NY THEN YOU CAN EXPECT EVIL AND DISOBIENCE TO PROVAIL how can any group of people who blantenly marry in a church before GOD ALMIGHTY and demand that society accept them, have any place NEXT TO A HOLY GOD IN HEAVEN, WHO IS WITH OUT SIN, ACCEPT THEIpeople who blantenly marry in a church before GOD ALMIGHTY and demand that society accept them, have any place NEXT TO A HOLY GOD IN HEAVEN, WHO IS WITH OUT SIN, ACCEPT THEIR SIN.

The group then divides into two subgroups, led by the minister and her co-facilitator, for experiential and feeling - level sharing, including debriefing on such between - session assignments as: «Talk to three people about death, being aware of how they respond» or «Imagine that you have only a limited time to live and try to say how this awareness influences your feelings about your lifestyle and present relationship.»

Psalm 10: 3 - 4 — This talks about the wicked men, how they do nt have God in their hearts or in their minds, which is a fine piece of scripture but it can hardly be used for either myself or the maker of the video since we both seem to advocate a deep and personal relationship with the Lord rather than letting a group of «religious» people ruin it for you.

But it would be easy to get a group of people talking about Lincoln the way we do Jesus if we taught them from childhood to do such and made it rewarding for them socially to do so.

My friends and i go to a christian church and some of the Muslim students have gone with us just to see and learn for them selves what it is like instead of going off rumors and here say... Unless you have experiences something on your own you have no right to talk smack about it... The reason the world is the way it is is because people are to stuck up THEIR butts and THEIR way, to even try and become educated about anything else... im not saying convert or change your ways... But be educated about something before you talk because if your not you really look like a fool... ever religion, race, culture,... they have their good people and they have their bad people and you CAN NOT judge a whole race, religion, culture... off one group... that just being single minded!!!

I'm talking about which group of people she identifies with and therefore accepts the «label» of.

to say its only a small group of people tells me that you have no clue what % your talking about.

A friend who was a counselor before she retired and who knew from work one of the main problems in that church, sat me down one day and talked to me about what it had been like to work with that woman and how everyone saw that woman, and then my friend gave me this article to read that she had learned and used while she was still in practice before she retired: https://glynissherwood.com/12-steps-to-breaking-free-from-being-the-family-scapegoat/ This article speaks about family, but my friend told me it can be applied to any dysfunctional group of people.

No different to being in a group of people talking about a topic of interest.

For example, despite his insistence that what he does is different than what goes on in an Institutional Church, he still describes a group of people who sit in chairs arranged in a square, sing some songs from a book, and talk about spiritual things.

Instead, it was a title given to a group of people who not only believed in Jesus, and talked a lot about Him, but also lived like Him in generosity, service, forgiveness, and love.

The idea that a being would create the entire thing — with 400,000,000,000 galaxies, EACH with 100, 000,000,000 starts and even more planets, then sit back and wait 13,720,000,000 years for human beings to evolve on one planet so he could «love them» and send his son to Earth to talk to a nomadic group of Jews about sheep and goats in Greco - Roman Palestine (while ignoring the rest of the 200 million people then alive) makes no sense to us.

We could talk about how singling out a group of people based on religion only gives precedence for this to happen to Christians, too (something supporters of the Muslim registry would strongly decry).

It's just a group of people getting together, loving each other (or they want to) and talking about life.

The idea that a being would create the entire thing — with 400,000,000,000 galaxies, EACH with 100, 000,000,000 stars and even more planets, then sit back and wait 13,720,000,000 years for human beings to evolve on one planet so he could «love them» and send his son to Earth to talk to a nomadic group of Jews about sheep and goats in Iron Age Palestine (while ignoring the rest of the 200 million people then alive) makes no sense to us.»

«Here we are, a group of ninety people, gathered to talk about transforming an institution, the Church, that has a 1,900 - year history of oppression and exclusion,» announced Adams.

Now we are talking about a «group» of ~ 1.6 Billon people.

Observer — try instead of religious fanatics or zelots to be concerned about any group that feels that the time talking or dialouge is past and more drastic measures must be done so that people will begin to pay attention.

After talking about how the false teachers are bringing destruction upon themselves, Peter is going to give several examples from biblical history about other groups of people who were destroyed.

We are talking about a large group of people who no longer feel connected to organized religion as they have become an arm of politics and no longer a place of worship.

Do you know that there is a group of people that do not call themselves as Christian with the reference of that no where in the Bible Jesus (Peace be upon him) called himself as a Christian... and this group of people call themselves as a «Follower of Christ» and they also follows the verses talks about Jesus in Quran... just for your information...

If a large group of people meet in a building, talk about deities, organize in a function, use member money to sponser an event to spread their word in order to disuade another religious group and prove their god does nt exist... Well, im sorry bub, but thats about as religious as it gets.

The way some people talk about the Bible, it seems that God's whispering of truth was only heard by a small group of Middle Eastern men for a few brief centuries.

Negative stereotyping of outsiders and people who don't agree You almost immediately know how safe a group is by how they talk about others.

CG — How is Cathy excluding anyone by talking to already - religious groups of people about his belief?

No, momoya, it's about out of control insurance costs going ever higher because more and more is mandated to be covered, it's about tax exempt groups being in effect taxed via mandates and indeed mandated to pay things that go directly contrary to their philosophy, it's about disingenuous mumblers on the left talking incoherently about people being «forced» not to use contraception when (a) no one is forcing them to affiliate with the organization balking at the mandate, (b) no one is preventing them from buying contraception on their own dime and (c) no one is preventing them from buying their own health insurance plans, something MANY will have to do when Obamacare kicks in for real.

So if Paul's concluding «Application» is that people who were formerly at odds with one another (in an accusatory violent way) can now live at peace by following the example of Jesus, it only makes sense that in the «Solution» section, Paul talks about how Jesus brought the warring groups together and showed us how to live in peace.

And then comes: the taboo subjects; talking about people as if they are not there (or as if they are an «issue», not a person); assuming everyone (who counts) is of a certain race, ability, class, language, sexuality or gender; various non-biblical behavioural rules; the targeted enforcement of church rules (whether «biblical» or not) on particular groups; and the general reluctance to see things from another's perspective (even if this is a skill that churchgoers use all day, every day, outside thw church).