Sentences with phrase «talking about believers»

I don't think Paul is talking about believers who are «in the flesh», but there is nothing in the passage that necessitates people who are currently «in the flesh» must inevitably remain in that state.

It's not talking about believers whose sins have been forgiven through the shed blood of the Lord Jesus and who have been baptized into the body of Christ and sealed with the Holy Spirit unto the day of redemption.

By, we, I assume she is talking about believers in a religion or in one of the many gods.

And you guys talk about believers not making sense.

Not exact matches

Although Buffett talks little about market timing, he's always been a believer in buying when share prices dip or go on sale.

Certainly the New Testament talks about the priorities of that churchâ $» Jesus as its sole head and focus, daily encouragement among believers, plural and lateral leadership, open participation, and an environment of freedom so people can grow in him.â $ â $ œLike what I have with Jake?â $ â $ œAnd there will be others God will give you as you simply follow him, â $ John added.

Chris Foster talks about life in Cambodia and the importance of mentoring young believers.

The first two paragraphs of his article show that he is close - minded as the believers he talks about.

BELIEVERS know what Im talking about.

And as a point of interest, it talks about non believers.

I don't agree with Rachel much either but I think she was talking about people predisposed to be believers in the first place.

As you read the Bible and pray and meditate on it, and talk to other believers about it, you will begin to understand that truth.

I know this is not a topic many believers like to talk about but it's not one I shy away from because I know I serve an all powerful God.

Are you talking about the same version that leads some people to fly jets into building or explode bombs strapped to believers?

I guess you're talking about problems between believers.

Second, while some think that Peter is referring to believer's baptism because of the mention of water in 3:20, Peter clarifies in 3:21 that he is not talking about the outward washing of the flesh with water but the inner purification of a good conscience toward God, which is accomplished only through the Spirit.

Pastor Ross Smith of Celebration Church talks about the #Jesus4NZ rally, calling on believers to come together to pray for our nation at Parliament on Tuesday 30 January, 12 pm - 1:30 pm.

Those John is talking about in the passage you then quote are the ones who, by virtue of not believing Jesus actually came, are not believers, but rather ones who are specifically trying to come into the group and deny the incarnation of Christ.

I do think about new believers as well, so I try to come to an understanding of the text, then to talk it out (sometimes just alone with myself) with out all the «church terminology».

I'm NOT just talking about «bible believers» (yes, Christians and Jews believe in human evil, but so do a wide variety of religions, AND philosophical systems, AND political systems, AND individual thinkers), and you and I both know that we're not just talking about «millions», but BILLIONS — the number of those who believe in human evil FAR outnumber you.

Yet when religions talk about alternate states of being and planes of existence, they are ridiculed by believers in «science.»

Or about the part in leviticus where god's chosen people follow guidelines to slave ownership, or the other part of Leviticus that talks about the procedure of killing non believers and adulterers?

To the Editor: You really don't know what your talking about unless you have a real relationship with Jesus; A relationship where the Holy Spirit dwells inside of the Christian believer after being born again.

Our Father... and you do understand, God that I'm talking about only those believers in you that adhere to the very same doctrine that I do, preferably the ones that got saved in my church and were baptized by my pastor, but not the old pastor because he read the Amplified Bible, thats the our I'm talking about, God, certainly not those from the church down the street, and definitely not those other ones on the next block.

A believer could act like an atheist, I suppose, but what would he learn about atheists that he could not get by just reading some atheist literature or talking to some atheists?

These verses make that blatantly clear: Ezekiel 33:10 - 20, Romans 6:15 - 19, Matthew 18:21 - 35, Hebrews 12:12 - 17, Hebrews 10:16 - 26, James 2:14 - 26, Romans 2:1 - 16, Titus 3:1 - 11, Hebrews 4:1 - 8, And the letters to the churches in Revelation is talking about the different type of Believers, it is a warning to turn and repent, to do the works we first did.

Believers talk a lot about nonbelievers and unrepentant sinners going to hell when they die.

It is not necessary to know something about God in order really to believe in Him: many true believers know how to talk to God but not about Him.

They try to explain the Bible even though they do not know what they are talking about (which is the same thing they accuse believers of).

Islam talk about killing non believers if they are a hindrance to practice of islam.

But that same New Testament talks about the sense of rest that is the heritage of every believer.

Jesus must have been talking about future believers — all the discilples in the room had ALREADY seen the resurrected Jesus before they believed.

I am always amazed how readily, and with great relish, all these godly, holier - than - thou, know - it - all christians are ready to consign people to eternal flames.In Mark 16:18 where it talks about snake handling, it also says about baptized believers «and when they drink deadly poison it will not hurt them at all.»

He was talking to believers (baptized believers) about a renewing of their spirit, not about salvation.

I was listening to a preacher on the radio three days ago, talk about how his god hides himself [sic] so that believers have to have faith.

Rather, I think Paul was talking about the collective mind of all believers in Jesus.

I actually think a good way to define the faith believers are talking about is that it is between subjective and objective.

The only people I ever hear talking / facebooking about God are believers.

In the second verse he is talking about the God (His father -LCB- Not literally his biological father, Its a way to express himself close to God, as we are all children of God, cuz he created us all -RCB--RRB-, how he has reserved space in heaven for the believers.

Whenever I talk about our unity with all others, someone has to correct me by pointing out that their particular idea of Jesus demands a special and exclusive understanding that attracts a certain kind of believer and disciple.

Now that people in the mainline denominations are starting to talk unembarrassedly about church growth and evangelism of a fairly conventional sort, Wheeler worries that the potential exists for any emphasis on congregational studies to be misinterpreted as an outgrowth of the spirit of the times — which views local communities of believers uncritically, as in - arguably good things, and assumes that if there is anything the matter with them it is that they aren't big enough.

We can reason about all kinds of stuff that's hard, but this one, it's like there's a block, atheists WONT talk about it using the language of believers, you just want to berate us with equations.

When believers stop saying stupid things in public and stop trying to change laws because of their books - of - stupidity, atheists won't have much to talk about.

I only know personally of two successful christian communities where believers live either together or buy up houses on a particular street and run businesses (other than some cult communities which are differently run — they are not, I think what we are talking about here) and share resources.

People are talking about «it» — not that god is real, but that the delusion of god is real to the god - believers such as you.

My understanding rightly or wrongly is that when Jesus talked about fellow believers with being slapped down it was the hypocrisy he addressed with the speck in the brother's eye with the plank in the one saying brother let me remove that speck for you.

D.C. Talk's «Jesus Freak» seeks to express the fear that an adolescent believer harbors about being labeled or ostracized on account of his or her faith: «What will people do if they hear that I'm a «Jesus freak»?»

While there has already been gallons of ink devoted to the political debate regarding gun control (and there will likely be gallons more to come) the broader issue for believers is how exactly Christians should talk about the issue of gun control.

It is a sentiment often expressed on this blog and in real life by believers when they talk about those who think differently going to hell or being doomed by their god.

When a believer bit.ches and moans about how if gay marriage is legalized, next is polygamy, in.cest and beastiality, (because for some reason all of those things are related) and we reject that because 1) beastiality is stupid because we're talking about two consenting adults 2) Polygamy is not really immoral but just incredibly tricky legally to design docu.ments that would make sense and 3) inc.est has some scientific ramifications and most of us can agree that as far as icky se.xual stuff goes, that ones a doozy.