Sentences with phrase «talking about court cases»

I'm a former minister for justice [in Ireland], so I'm very reluctant to talk about court cases.

No, I'm not talking about this court case.

Not exact matches

In referring to 1964, Abrams is talking about the landmark Sullivan vs. New York Times case, in which the Supreme Court established what's known as the «malice standard» for libel.

Kodie from TLC's «sister wives», the polygamist serial was talking about filing court case for recognition of polygamous marriages coz gay ones are... just wait and see the incesters, pedoists, animalists, everyone will join in

We talk about why kids shouldn't be the center of your life, discuss the importance of a regular date night, hear a tense couple's court case, find out how to make a family mission statement and a lot more!

Einhorn has asked those involved in the proceedings not to talk about the case outside of court to protect the child's identity.

In an exclusive interview, Ghanaian investigative journalist Anas Aremeyaw Anas talks to RFI about the ongoing court cases against several judges implicated in his undercover sting operation revealing alleged corruption within Ghana's judiciary.

«We are talking about a two - court structure, but we're still trying to figure out a way to balance the role of judges in these cases as well as the district attorneys» role,» he said, adding, «There would be family court for the less serious cases and a youth court for the more serious cases.

Mei is a key figure in the case, having worn an FBI wire as a government cooperator and taping at least one conversation with Singh that included talk about town officials confronting Mei about potential misconduct, court papers say.

Nassau County Legislator Carrié Solages appeared in court in his domestic violence case following his November re-election, with his lawyer signaling the Democratic official wants to talk to prosecutors about a possible end to the matter.

Albany, NY — On this week's show, Alan talks with the executive director of New York's School Boards Association, Tim Kremer, about the status of the state's public schools, the long - running Campaign for Fiscal Equity court case, and their opinions on Education Commisioner Richard Mills and NYC Schools Chancellor Joel Klein.

On this week's episode of the podcast, in advance of the Supreme Court's decision, Marty West talks with Josh Dunn about the case.

Especially in Washington, where the McCleary State Supreme Court case has had lawmakers talking about school funding for almost seven years, efficiently using existing school resources is critical.

We talked with the B&N legal team last week about the recent DOJ case involving the big six publishers and Apple, I talk about one of the motions in court they are filing to stop the settlement from the three companies that bowed out of the court case a few months ago.

And please, let's not bother talking about NAMA, court cases etc... For years now, REO's had terrible corporate governance, far too much leverage, and pretty much promised to totally fuck investors... And so it has come to pass, and shareholders don't even have a luxury Moroccan get - away to show for it...

The article also talks about the Watson case (one of the Tax Court cases I referred to), which can be used as the guidelines for determining the «reasonable» compensation.

For court cases that require a victim to testify in court and come face - to - face with their perpetrator, or discuss a difficult event, therapy animals are being used to help victims talk about their trauma and aid with post-traumatic stress disorder.

This time, The Gamesmen talk about Nintendo suing people, Jim Sterling's court case, a sync issue will the Joy - Cons, the day one patch for Mass Effect: Andromeda, the Shadow of Mordor sequel, and the PlayStation VR.

You could argue, and I might agree, that what the Indian press is happily talking about is on the slight side, since the case has yet to come to court.

There might be a case for taking them to court for talking about alarmist junk that has no data to support it.

Courts can also move the trial to a new location; they can grant motions from the defense to delay the trial while things cool down; they can sequester the jurors (meaning that the jurors are kept in a central place and prevented from talking to anyone else or reading anything about the case); if none of these are done, a conviction can potentially be reversed on appeal.

In the UK, there was a case where in a court case, the father of the accused talked to a very good friend of a witness in very hypothetical terms about hypothetical consequences of making a witness statement, and father and son both got into deep trouble with it.

The case now before the Supreme Court of Canada, at the least, «makes sure people are talking» about the issue and «taking First Nations into account.»

Now, when you're talking about jury trials, the court system can not necessarily handle a regular flow of these jury trials, so cases get postponed and postponed and postponed.

The staff can not tell you whether or not you should sue someone, recommend any specific attorney or law firm, give you an opinion about your case or predict how a judge might rule, talk to a judge on your behalf, or tell you what words to use in your court papers or at a court hearing.

Among the things Mike talks about on today's podcast are how to build up your client's comfort level with the legal system, how to teach them to make their case, and how to talk to clients who «just want their day in court.»

Don't be afraid to make policy arguments, and to talk about not only what has happened in prior cases but also what might happen in future cases, if the Court doesn't resolve the issue at hand.

In her book, Extraordinary Damages in Canadian Employment Law, MacDonald talks about cases where the courts attributed a duty of care to the employer to provide a safe and healthy workplace, and the courts» willingness to use a broad application of the definition of workplace.

Justice Kennedy was talking about how law review case comments generally come out too late to be of use to the Court (especially in the context of deciding whether to grant certiorari in a case).

They talk about law from time to time, as in «The Supreme Court Fails Semantics,» where they criticize the U.S. Supreme Court's analysis in Morse v. Frederick [PDF], the «BONG HiTS 4 JESUS» case, or «The right to do process,» in which they deconstruct aspects of the American constitution, or «Banning «rape» in a rape trial.»

In this video, mesothelioma attorney Richard Dodd talks about the importance of seeking representation from a trial lawyer who is not afraid to take your case to court.

If I offer a fixed - price «contested» divorce, for example, then the incentive for the client is to make full - use of that pricing model and to regularly and repeatedly want to: 1) talk about their case (i.e., their evil spouse's latest antics) on the phone or in - person; 2) file more motions to get their spouse to do something, to prevent their spouse from doing something, or to object to something the court ruled; 3) send more «demand letters» or make more phone calls to the opposing party or their attorney to tell them to return the car seat, or to complain that they dropped off the child 15 minutes late, etc; and 4) respond to ad hoc motions from the other side (motions for attorney's fees, motions to compel discovery, motions for summary disposition, motions to enforce, etc).

CAMPBELL: The difficulty in talking about the big cases, I look at the little cases, and part of my concern is that where you may see some of the court decisions that become problematic for the areas in which you are involved because, think of the companies, and they may be reasonable size but not huge, that don't have an in - house IT person, don't have an in - house counsel and maybe cloud computing for servers, and they have got a major piece of litigation and they don't have a policy.

In the US, jurors can talk about trials after the court case, and there are starting to be people creating blogs after the fact.

No one was really willing to talk about the case, and he was forced to write it from various outside and non-attributable sources and court documents.

This weird Facebook ownership lawsuit brought by Paul Ceglia has been going on for a while now, but it's noteworthy how many lawyers have taken on the case and withdrawn — especially given that Facebook is now talking about bringing actions against prior attorneys for Ceglia based on failure to report evidence of fraud to the court.

In such a case, the courts are likely to re-interpret the wording of the statute so that it is sensible to talk about «divulging» (the court always find an intent underlying the words of a legislative body).

«You've got to really talk specifically about what you're objecting to and I think that's what the court found offensive here — they tried to argue in the case that it was just about an amount of deemed dividend,» says Gibson.

The one big element of the court's engagement with Canadian history that I haven't talked about is precedent — the accumulated weight of case law, not just on section 121 but on federalism generally and the power of regulation in particular that has emerged since Confederation.

Elie and Joe talk to Professor Peter Irons about Justice Scalia's vacancy and the often very personal stories of the people who bring their cases to the United States Supreme Court.

We then took the case up to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which refused to accept the appeal, and now we are in Federal Court, and I will let Laura talk a little bit about that litigation.

In what will probably be my last post for this year (though it won't be the last post here on a patent case, or one of the last ones, in general as far as my own plans are concerned), I'm going to talk about a couple of FRAND - related court filings that were made earlier this month.

We got to talking about how frustrated their clients have become with the backlog of cases in Superior Court.

Laura talks about their petition for a writ of habeas corpus asking the Wisconsin federal court to review Brendan's interrogation confession, his original legal representation, and the way Wisconsin state courts handled Brendan's case.

Prosecutors complained that Bulger's lawyers were tainting the potential jury pool and violating local federal court rules governing lawyers by talking to reporters about the case and attacking the credibility of the government's witnesses.

In some cases, your lawyer may talk to the court about stopping your husband from removing assets from the home before the divorce is finalized.

While the Supreme Court has talked a good show about freedom of thought, its precedents say little about how the Amendment would apply to a case implicating free thought but not expression.

Here Brooks talks to Lawyer Monthly about his expert witness role in this field, the challenges faced by Courts, the various types of cases he in instructed on, and gives insight into the changes that have shaped this expert witness role through the years.

One way lawyers pass the time (as we wait for the lawyer in front of us to plead his case, or wait for the court probation officer or a client to complete paperwork, or wait to be let into the jail, etc.) is to talk about interesting current cases we have pending, and various legal issues raised by our clients» cases.

Hendrix said he would be talking with legal counsel about whether to appeal the case to a higher court.