Sentences with phrase «talking about gene»

If you're talking about gene duplication, it drops to about 95 %.

«The product is just phenomenally innovative, and we've been talking about gene therapy for over 20 years.

«When scientists talk about genes «for» this or that molecule, trait, or disease, they are being fanciful,» argues Hubbard.

Jesse Smith talked about gene transcription inhibitors as potential cancer therapeutics.

Not exact matches

Gene Siciliano talks about what entrepreneurs need to know about their finances in order to build a sustainable business.

In the case of homosexuality we potentially are talking about randomly occurring variations of a a specific gene that would seem to occur with regularity.

When AMIA leaders talked to me about their departure from the Episcopal Church, they focused more on the doctrinal problems represented by Bishop Spong than on the sexual issues raised by the election of gay bishop V. Gene Robinson.

Last, had I known that alcoholism is a disease worse than cancer, and that it ran through the family genes thus any baby born had a strong chance of becoming one... well, that seals the deal but, I bet the parents who also fell for religiosity, not knowing it was an enclave for pedophiles... talk about regrets from hell.

By Lauren Kearney You may have first seen Gene Baur when he was featured talking about how not eating animal products changed his life in the inspirational pro-vegan film, Forks Over Knives.

Gene Smith, Ohio State's Athletic Director, delivered the following quote today while talking about satellite camps with Sirius XM radio:

If he stayed we would not be talking about Jerry Jones, Gene Klein or the Spanos family

Gene Smith, Ohio State's Athletic Director, delivered the following quote today while talking about satellite camps with Sirius XM radio: «Satellite...

On May 2, 2017, a reporter from The New York Times visited Tidmarsh and talked to Mass Audubon regional scientist Gene Albanese live about the restoration.

Today, let's talk about you and your genes and the reasons why your baby's nose looks humongous.

In this episode of the Birthful podcast, I talk with professor Gene Declercq about the complex realm of inductions.

Doctor Gene Heslin, a family practice physician, and Mark McKinney from the Healthcare Information Exchange of New York, joined us to talk about this.

In this episode, psychiatric geneticist Laura Jean Bierut talks about her article in the April Scientific American about the influence of genes on alcoholism.

Steve: So you might have a gene for a particular brain receptor or, I think what you talk about in the article is not actually the structure of the receptor molecule, but the amount of receptors that you actually produce?

Journalist Bonnie Rochman talks about her new Scientific American / Farrar, Straus and Giroux book, The Gene Machine: How Genetic Technologies Are Changing the Way We Have Kids — and the Kids We Have.

Steve: And there's one of the researchers you quote in the article talks about, there may be genes that are not directly responsible for some aspect of brain function even at a biochemical cascade level; there might be a gene that is responsible for the width of the birth canal and that that could be associated with ultimately with intelligence.

David Epstein talks about his 2013 bestseller The Sports Gene: Inside the Science of Extraordinary Athletic Performance and his recent Scientific American article «Magic Blood and Carbon - Fiber Legs at the Brave New Olympics.»

Some are talking about the potential of a gene swap between the pig and avian flu strains.

But now we're talking about imprinted genes that influence behavior.

Anyone who seriously proposes that there is a force beyond gene expression, signaling molecules, differential adhesion, and those kinds of mechanisms, just doesn't know what they are talking about.

I think about that scene when I hear the way many of my environmentalist friends talk about genetically modified organisms, or GMOs, an ill - fitting term that has come to stand for plants, animals and other living things whose genes have been directly manipulated in the lab using the techniques of modern biotechnology.

In this episode, Scientific American news editor Phil Yam discusses how veterinarians, physicians and multinational food companies need to work together in the global fight against animal - borne infectious diseases; and University of Wisconsin evolutionary biologist Sean Carroll talks about recent research tracking the evolution of yeast genes with specific functions descended from a single, duplicated gene with multiple functions.

Genes are a reification, a shorthand way of talking about lengths of DNA.

The first organism in which scientists went in and inserted genes that did not belong to its species into that organism; and as I talk about it in the book, genetic engineering has caused a lot of anxiety in part because people feel that it's not natural.

Steve: What we are talking about is, are their individuals alive today who carry Neandertal genes — did that lineage survive?

Genes have to work together and then it gets back to the switches that I was talking about before.

Daniel Haber, director of the Massachusetts General Cancer Center, remembers the group talking about CRISPR gene editing, artificial intelligence to improve diagnosis and treatment plans, and immunotherapy techniques that incite the immune system to fight tumors.

He foresees a time when patients meet with a physician at age 50 for an assessment that includes blood and gene tests, personal and family history, and talk about diet, habits and behavior.

In the final type of genetic disorder we'll talk about, more than one gene gets in on the action.

Finally, Yingjie Guan, assistant professor (research) of orthopaedics at Brown and Lifespan, at the COBRE for Skeletal Health and Repair, talked about her detailed work on how mechanical regulation of gene expression, for instance by the micro RNA miR - 365, affects cartilage and bone health.

But to some people, the very idea of transferring genes between species conjures up mad scientists running amok — and so, two centuries after Mary Shelley wrote «Frankenstein,» they talk about Frankenfood.

Professor Chris Jones talked to us about building a world - class research programme focused on finding the genes that drive childhood brain tumours, and his hopes for these hard - to - treat cancers.

In December 2015, a group of scientists, bioethicists and policy experts from different countries met to talk about regulating human gene editing.

«For DNA arrays involving human genes, we're talking about analyzing 18,000 segments of DNA,» he said.

So, when you see the word «environment» used when talking about the causes of schizophrenia - another way to think of it is «everything other than genes».

First of all - its important to understand that when schizophrenia researchers talk about «environment» they have a very broad definition that basically includes everything other than «genes» or genetic factors.

We had plenty of supply of the good gene, as it were, and we knew there were individuals who had a gene that was damaged, and surely we ought to be able to put these together using this message searching that I was talking about, this information searching.

Talk about great genes.

And for a vegan bodybuilder who must unfortunatelly play tetris with the food sources that he choses in order to give to his body the right ammounts of aminos, restricting SPI and soy foods so much does not make his goal any easier.There are sometimes that you need a meal thats complete with aminos and soy provides that meal with the additional benefits of lacking the saturated fats trans cholesterol and other endothelium inflammatory factors.I'm not saying that someone should go all the way to 200gr of SPI everyday or consuming a kilo of soy everyday but some servings of soy now and then even every day or the use of SPI which helps in positive nitrogen balance does not put you in the cancer risk team, thats just OVERexaggeration.Exercise, exposure to sunlight, vegan diet or for those who can not something as close to vegan diet, fruits and vegetables which contains lots of antioxidants and phtochemicals, NO STRESS which is the global killer, healthy social relationships, keeping your cortisol and adrenaline levels down (except the necessary times), good sleep and melatonin function, clean air, no radiation, away from procceced foods and additives like msg etc and many more that i can not even remember is the key to longevity.As long as your immune system is functioning well and your natural killer cells TP53 gene and many other cancer inhibitors are good and well, no cancer will ever show his face to you.With that logic we shouldn't eat ANY ammount of protein and we should go straight to be breatharians living only with little water and sunlight exposure cause you like it or not the raise of IGF1 is inevitable i know that raise the IGF1 sky high MAYBE is not the best thing but we are not talking about external hormones and things like this.Stabby raccoon also has a point.And even if you still worry about the consumption of soy... http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21711174.

Dr. Fasano is a physician / researcher who talks about the three - legged stool of autoimmunity; a combination of genes, triggers, and intestinal permeability must be present for autoimmunity to develop.

Rhonda Patrick talks about how to hack your genes through diet and lifestyle.

Unrelated but WOW, sometimes watching a TV show does prove useful, I was watching The Blacklist s02e10 0:11:45 in and they talk about tet1 gene and its role in erasing trauma / memories.

The big gene that is being talked about in our methylation circles is MTHFR.

We talk about the new types of gene testing available and their role in determining what we should and shouldn't eat.

Ive noticed in db rows on high reps the form is crucial i go real light but contract and when I'm done il do pulldowns for 2 sets of over 50 just to loosen up Another thing i notice since i e grown obsessed with web vids and research is anyone who talks about a program that is big imo is on juice now you look at johnny candito my god this kid is strong as hell id bet he's natural but his upper body is not big no traps, I've always noticed juicers always get traps lol so be careful who you listen or watch i still believe micheal has great genes for linear progress that he made I'm not trying to downplay this routine just keep it in perspective take care i hope this was legible.

The last factor that I'm going to talk about are your genes.