Sentences with phrase «talking about geoengineering»

At the same time, he said, the world is talking about geoengineering.

Since we are talking about geoengineering, by coincidence, this Keith is the very same as Mr. Geo - engineer himself, David W. Keith, a man of many interests.

@joshua I agree that that is surprising, since they edited out w / o notice my point that the experiment was a model of communication dynamics & not a meaningful test if whether it makes sense to go around talking about geoengineering.

If you're talking about geoengineering, don't forget that the CO2 from the limestone burning process can be essentially pure, which means little expense in capturing and sequestering it.

Atmosphere of Hope does a decent job of talking about geoengineering in a broader climate policy context, but at times seems poorly researched.

The «basket of technologies» way of talking about geoengineering puts the focus on «technologies» as «devices» or things, objects, rather than where the focus should be: upon activities or practices.

Oliver Morton: Well, there's a way of talking about geoengineering that's too large for me.

It just seems to me that if you really don't think the climate should get more than 2 degrees warmer, then you kind of have to be talking about geoengineering in one way or another.

(That's one of the reasons I think that the talk about geoengineering is essential, and even more essential than bloviation on that front is practical research, testing and efforts to build management systems.

Currently, one of the most talked about geoengineering ideas is Solar Radiation Management (SRM), which intends to block shortwave solar radiation, thus cooling the Earth to offset rising temperatures.

I will talk about the geoengineering programs to anyone who mentions the weird weather.

Can you talk about geoengineering's prospects in the coming decades?

Not exact matches

Catherine Matacic — online news editor for Science — talks with Sarah Crespi about how geoengineering could reduce the harshest impacts of climate change, but make them even worse if it were ever turned off.

Some scientists fear that even talking about such geoengineering will embolden people to keep polluting.

Keith is miffed that many policymakers see geoengineering as a «completely crazy, risky, way - out - there thing we shouldn't talk about» while remaining sanguine about massive reliance on negative emissions.

You are talking about the «absolute» feasibility of geoengineering not thermostats.

In fact, talking about this around 1990 convinced me that only geoengineering (or, a better term, climate control) could get us through to a comfortable world, centuries from now.

But triggering an algae bloom is also a way to suck carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, and along with spewing particles into the stratosphere to block some of the sun's heat, it's one of the main techniques geoengineers talk about using if efforts to limit those emissions ultimately fail.

How about oil giants such as ExxonMobil, which for years funded climate - science disinformation and is now talking up the prospects of geoengineering.

Geoengineering will not go away because we are not talking about it — Guest Post — Tina Johnson, Energy Action Coalition

I'm talking about discussions of geoengineering «above the table», not under it.

There is an urgency that is required of the environmental movement to talk about what failure to win on mitigation or adaptation on a large scale, in meaningful ways, could likely result in — geoengineering / climate engineering of the environment as the only option.

People around here are beginning to talk pretty openly about geoengineering and chem trails, at long, long last.

Myhrvold and Wood are so sure that they're right about climate models and geoengineering that they seem to blow off the serious problems and ignore the experts who actually know what the hell they're talking about — experts like Ken Caldeira and his fellow practicing climatologists.

In other words, in the face of poor progress on mitigation, let's not be caught with our pants down again, and start talking about (and researching and testing) geoengineering while there is still time.

Susan Ferguson, ContributorWaking Times Geoengineering, often referred to as weather modification, is one of the most important issues of our time that almost no one is willing to talk about.

Geoengineering will not go away because we are not talking about it.

We joined scientists Michael Mann and Dana Nucitelli on the Al Jazeera English «Inside Story Americas» program on May 17 to talk about the scientific consensus on human - caused climate change, U.S. public opinion, the Keystone XL pipeline, geoengineering, and other... Continue reading →

We joined scientists Michael Mann and Dana Nucitelli on the Al Jazeera English «Inside Story Americas» program on May 17 to talk about the scientific consensus on human - caused climate change, U.S. public opinion, the Keystone XL pipeline, geoengineering, and other aspects of the collision between climate science and government accountability: