Sentences with phrase «talking about looking into»

Not exact matches

Michael Dell doesn't talk specifically about the companies he's interested in, but according to an April 2012 Forbes interview, Dell said he, personally, looks at over 250 companies every year that might fit into the company's acquisition strategy, even if the company only acts on a few.

As of late, he has come under fire for his firing of FBI director James Comey, his alleged sharing of guarded intelligence about ISIS with the Russian foreign minister, and allegations that Trump obstructed justice by asking Comey not to look into his former National Security Adviser, Michael Flynn, who Trump has since fired for misrepresenting talks he had with Russian ambassador Sergei Kisylak.

You're looking for 3 - 5 people who fit into your target market and would be willing to talk with you about themselves.

My first mission is to pay off the credit cards (avalanche / snowball method) within the next 11 months and then look into all of the savings / investment, Personal Finance tracking, and other items you talked about in your blog.

Preston: [00:17:56] So what's so interesting here is that on one side we have Silicon Valley working at a rapid pace to create this new digital cryptocurrency and we also have governments and global authorities looking into the implications of using the similar technology whether it's the IMF or other central banks around the world that are that are talking about using some form of crypto to back their monetary baseline.

If you want to talk about your income being more diverse, just take a look at my real - world six - figure dividend growth stock portfolio that I built by living below my means and investing my excess capital into fantastic dividend growth stocks like those you can find on David Fish's Dividend Champions, Contenders, and Challengers list.

The tv show did talk about ethereum and bitcoin last season, but it looks like they are dipping into cryptocurrencies once more by talking about Initial Coin Offerings.

When I look across the board and all the readings I've done in putting into action really what Chris Whalen talks about..

you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.

But we will talk about that in weeks to come as we look deeper into the great truths found in Ephesians 6:10 - 20.

Although, I have to say, when you look back... for example, at President Kennedy, everybody was saying, «He's too Catholic, he's gonna be listening to the pope,» which is laughable, because we now know that he literally brought prostitutes into the White House while he was president of the United States while he was married, but nobody talks about that.

Please look into it yourself, you will see what I am talking about.

I guess I'd invite you to trust that the God you worship is not looking for reasons to condemn you or to hurl you into hell (and we can talk about that too, hahaha).

Please look into what you're talking about!

Look into that imputed vs. infused thing I was talking about earlier.

I know it doesn't look like forcing a stranger strapped into the seat next to me to talk about Christianity, like it's follicular unit extraction, especially if she doesn't want to.

There is a variety of ways to get connected as a group — joining hands in the circle with eyes closed for a moment and then discussing what each person experienced; milling around, taking a brief time to hold the hands and look into the eyes of each member, repeating his name; talking in pairs for a few minutes about topics such as «What I hope for and fear in this group,» «What's most important to me right now,» «What I hope to become in the next year,» after which each person introduces his partner to the group, sharing what he has learned.

People have been talking about making stuffed peppers since forever, and I'd always wanted to delve into this goodness (I like the way they look, and there's just something awesome about stuffing all kinds of food into another food), but the peppers were always wildly expensive, so I did not.

We're seriously into the layered look, and we're not talking about clothes here.

Since the Thunder are looking to bring foreign bigs Tibor Pleiss and Andrey Vorontsevich into the mix, there has been a lot of talk about the Thunder bailing out of the 2012 draft altogether.

Gary Neville laid into him again on Monday night for not taking responsibility and maybe Ozil has taken that on, because he has been talking to Arsenal Player this week about his need to be more selfish and go for goal more often himself rather than looking for one of the strikers.

Everyone talking about Lacazete, Dechamps knows the reasons he prefers likes of Giroud, Griezmann, Anotony Martial and may be now Mbappe to Lacazette, i don't think Wenger Fancies Lacazette that much, i guess he would have signed him last Season, Mbappe looks better even though he's 8 years younger than him, He can still be bent and be molded into World class.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

now everybody just talk Shiit about us and with us fans being the joke in every pub... sport bar even in every argument... on Thursday when we were a goal down against Koln two Chelsea fans who just walked into the bar where I was watching the game were like» look at them, see how pathetic they are.

«I hit the shots,» Spieth conceded, «but, you know, we made a couple decisions that make me look back and think, «Wow, we got some stuff to talk about before we get ready to go into a major.»

But talk about our custodian when it comes to saving set - pieces, Perdersen made Sceczeny look a fool, i remember da same thing at OT, when Rooney had fun of him in free kicks dis one field 2 look into 2 enhance our chances 4 top 4 finish.

My husband is circ'd and we are actually (TMI and he will kill me, lol) looking into forskin restoring, he's happy with his penis how it is, and doesn't feel like he has «lost» anything, nor does he have any bad thoughts about his parents, but we've done some research and read some websites and have talked about it a bit (obviosuly it wouldnt be the same as having not been circ'd but it would be an improvement.)

Still, even though I'd looked into tons of things related to unmedicated births and the differences between midwifery care and conventional OB - GYN care, there were lots of subtle differences in how my midwives talked about and approached birth that I had to give birth in order to truly and fully understand.

But once these little kids come into daily contact with other preschoolers — kids who also love to talk about their families — they begin to notice that not all families look the same.

I'm not sure if you are still looking for advice, but I have experience with it... My 8 yr old stayed in the bed with me (and hubby) since day 1, when I got pregnant with my second when he was 16 mths old, we set up his room with a toddler bed (he could get out of his playpen since 9 mths un-assisted, and never had a crib) so we made sure it was fun and playful and gave him that option, we also set up a separate cot beside out bed, so he could be with us still (I was not comfortable being pregnant with a toddler and hubby in bed then, knowing I would have a baby soon) since I was pregnant I was able to talk about it to him and explain why he was going to have to one day move to his own bed (in our room or his) by the time I had the baby he was starting the nights in his own bed and if he woke up he would come into his cot beside our bed... I let him continue like that as long as he wanted, it took time but I did not push him at all, same with breast feeding I let him make the choice... when I left my hubby (now ex) the boys were both big enough (2 and 4 yrs) for me to be comfortable with them both in bed with me, and I was still nursing my younger one until he was around 3.5 yrs old, so we just had a big bed with us all piled in, I miss those days so much: (so how did I finally get them both out of my bed?

Take time to do research about each test, talk to your doctor about why it is being offered, look into what is covered, and talk to your partner about what you want to do.

We all still talk about mom's Labor Day labor, and now as a doula, I look forward to one day having a client go into labor on Labor Day.

The great thing about that book is that it talked about nap schedules and how to look for the signals in your children about when they're tired and how to work that into their days so that you can be flexible with what your child needs and that's really hard when you have three at the same time but it made us able to come up with a way to have a daily schedule that allowed for having naps and we were really strict about you know, we have to do naps.

Camie talked about how trauma, historical or individual, will always be passed down through each generation until someone is able to step back and question why their family does things a certain way and is willing to look deeply into that family's trauma to heal.

A weary - looking Mayor Bill de Blasio — with growing bags under his eyes — trotted out tired talking points on Thursday even as he was barraged with a fresh round of questions about the investigation into his fundraising.

«Everyone's talking about Biden getting into the race, and with Clinton's polls dropping, the governor of New York seems to naturally look to the national stage,» Cox said.

De Blasio said that once Taylor «made clear his interest in looking at other options, it connected with the fact that we had all been talking about some of the changes and reorganization we had to consider and gelled into the decision to put together a specific review process.»

May: «Well, if you look at the issues around people who are — as you say I mean I talked about people who were «just about managing,» who sometimes find life a struggle when I came into Downing Street last year and there are a number of ways in which I want to support those people.

That's what this is all about - making out that the Tories are so out - of - touch (a key Labour message which, if you look carefully, finds its way into every other press release issued by the opposition) they have to talk to working people as if they're all still wearing flat caps and heading off down the mines.

So, we're talking about this period 3.5 million years ago, this is the middle Pleistocene, and that's where the CO2 concentrations were round about 400 ppm; and if we want to look at CO2 concentrations considerably higher than that, we're going to go much deeper in time, and then we're really going into periods where sea level was even higher.

Celebrity routines don't really differ that much unless we are talking about serious weight loss and getting a shredded look or packing on slabs of meat into a small time frame.

This would be great for you to look into in detail because when we talk about energy... You don't want too much energy created, otherwise you're hypothyroid, and then you've got a fast heart rate.

I will definitely look into the brand of gelatin you talked about, it sounds a lot better and more reliable.

We talked about getting the urine organic acids for looking into the yeast and measuring it that way because stool test often gives us a false negative.

We talked about the sugar in the diet we talked about the gun infections, looking into those for bacteria and yeast fungus, parasites, getting your gut check with functional testing, not conventional testing.

As for the Electrical Muscle Stimulation device, I can't speak to that... I have never heard of its effect specifically on women with DR.. It's something that you should talk with your doc about and look into the research.

And this is something that I've talked about a lot, this is something that worked into this Look Good Naked and Longevity Program that I created.

Dave: Now, we've pumped up intermittent fasting and it talks... I'm actually fascinated that you've looked into what happens if you eat only fat because I, honestly when I started some of my Bulletproof got the experiments, I feel freaking amazing but I didn't have all the research that I have now about, okay, what are the reasons it's doing what I can feel it doing and I can measure it doing.

I tried to find real studies that have looked into these two water claims, but only find a lot of lay people, as well as many Doctors, talking about the issue and offering their opinions, but no one seems to have a study or studies to substantiate.

So, in a previous podcast episode when you were on the show and I'll make sure I link to that in the Shownotes for people, you talked about when somebody walks into your office how you look for a range of symptoms.