Sentences with phrase «talking about measurements»

New - school foundation officials are fond of talking about measurements and outcomes.

Talk about the measurement of CO2 concentration that has been going on in Hawaii since 30 or 40 years ago.

So although there will be lots of scientific talk about measurements requiring adjusted parameters and newly discovered feedbacks and whatnot to explain all the changes, underneath it all this is still just a bidding game where people pick numbers which are big enough to be alarming so they'll get funded, but not too big lest people start to laugh.

We are talking about the measurement for the surface temp, I am sure you realize.

I found this website that talks about measurements at sea that extend back to 1851 for the North Atlantic hurricane basin:

Not exact matches

The meaningfulness of talk about alternative possible measurements does not in itself ensure the propriety of conjunctively combining equations which each express relationships among the results of one of the four possible measuring procedures.

BABYSTEP 7: BAKING INGREDIENTS OVERVIEW All About Honey Let's Talk About Powdered Milk Holiday Baking and FOOD STORAGE Let's Talk About Powdered Eggs Handout: Substitutions, Measurements, and Yields Egg White Powder Food Storage Substitutions All About Powdered Sour Cream All About Yeast and Vital Wheat Gluten All About Powdered Butter All About Freeze - Dried Cheese How To Make Ricotta Cheese From Powdered Milk

At the end of his talk he said, «You know, we've tried to test these ideas in the field and the lab, and there are really no measurements that match the quantities I've told you about.»

Let's talk about your effort to understand the measurement problem by positing parallel universes — or, as you call them in aggregate, the multiverse.

Talk about failure to communicate: In 1999, the $ 125 million Mars Climate Orbiter burned up in Martian orbit because navigation software used metric units while the thrusters were programmed to follow English measurements.

But I still need to understand the difference because you talk about «decrease in HGH - IGF - 1» in the article and using IGF1 measurement as a surrogate for HGH.

It appears likely he is talking about his home measurement of glucose being 105.

I want to link you to Phil's latest article, where he really talks about the importance of returning to trusting your body's natural nutrition measurement system: how hungry you are, and what you're hungry for.

The measurements were perfect, I LOVE the brass detailing and the little wicker inset on the top, and it is in beautiful shape, oh and can we talk about that woodgrain?

In this specific instance of between sizes decisions it depends upon the fabric and the structure of the clothing in question, the way you like your clothing to hang on you (ie snugly or loosely,) and what type of measurement difference we're talking about between the two sizes in questions.

I don't know about you, but I always get a bit deer in the headlights when trying to read a size chart online when talking about body measurements.

Included in the PowerPoint: Macroeconomic Objectives (AS Level) a) Aggregate Demand (AD) and Aggregate Supply (AS) analysis - the shape and determinants of AD and AS curves; AD = C+I+G + (X-M)- the distinction between a movement along and a shift in AD and AS - the interaction of AD and AS and the determination of the level of output, prices and employment b) Inflation - the definition of inflation; degrees of inflation and the measurement of inflation; deflation and disinflation - the distinction between money values and real data - the cause of inflation (cost - push and demand - pull inflation)- the consequences of inflation c) Balance of payments - the components of the balance of payments accounts (using the IMF / OECD definition): current account; capital and financial account; balancing item - meaning of balance of payments equilibrium and disequilibrium - causes of balance of payments disequilibrium in each component of the accounts - consequences of balance of payments disequilibrium on domestic and external economy d) Exchange rates - definitions and measurement of exchange rates - nominal, real, trade - weighted exchange rates - the determination of exchange rates - floating, fixed, managed float - the factors underlying changes in exchange rates - the effects of changing exchange rates on the domestic and external economy using AD, Marshall - Lerner and J curve analysis - depreciation / appreciation - devaluation / revaluation e) The Terms of Trade - the measurement of the terms of trade - causes of the changes in the terms of trade - the impact of changes in the terms of trade f) Principles of Absolute and comparative advantage - the distinction between absolute and comparative advantage - free trade area, customs union, monetary union, full economic union - trade creation and trade diversion - the benefits of free trade, including the trading possibility curve g) Protectionism - the meaning of protectionism in the context of international trade - different methods of protection and their impact, for example, tariffs, import duties and quotas, export subsidies, embargoes, voluntary export restraints (VERs) and excessive administrative burdens («red tape»)- the arguments in favor of protectionism This PowerPoint is best used when using worksheets and activities to help reinforce the ideas talked about.

In our recent article, Emotional Intelligence vs. IQ, we talked about the difference between Emotional Intelligence and the Intelligence Quotient; two equally important measurements of ability.

William received his MA in Science Education from Georgia State University, where he honed his skills for developing inquiry - based learning environments, and his PhD in Educational Psychology Measurement and Evaluation at the University of North Carolina, where he researched how students develop self - regulated learning skills and how parents talk to their children about race.

If you don't grasp that there is a large transient component in any one year's temperature measurement, you have no business talking about trends.

And then Joe goes on to point out that one possible explanation for the pause is measurement — there's been a ton of warming in the Arctic as if we are somehow hiding that fact when we talk about the pause.

If you're talking about global mean temperature I would advise you to compare the projections of the IPCC to the actual measurements of GISS as well as HadCRUT, RSS MSU, and UAH MSU measured data.

As we are talking about tiny hundredths of a degree measurements I am finding it very difficult to place any significance on pre 2003 data.

If the new report Rose is talking about says the increase since 1951 is 0.12 °C per decade, then it's off by only 8 percent from the earlier measurement of 0.13 °.

And I'm not talking about satellite sea level measurements.

But you are talking about the difficulties of individual measurements.

Is «roughly» the flexible Warmist term for «I haven't got the faintest idea what I'm talking about», or is it a scientific measurement?

No where do i find what temperature they are talking about, they talked about balance, but for any single measurement at toa, it'll never be in balance, because the planet below emitting the energy is always in change (seasons).

Now are you claiming you can take a molecule with a certain kinetic energy (which is what temperature is a measurement of), and raise it 17 kilometers above the Earth (increasing its potential energy by 4664 Joules if we're talking about a mole of N2) without inputting more energy, and have it maintain that same kinetic energy, that same temperature?

The other thing I don't get is the precision — we're talking about fractions of a degree in measurements from places where the heat will burn you up to places where you need snowsuits to survive??

I've also seen reminiscences of an oceanographer [Stevenson] talking about taking measurements in a research ship with steel buckets in the 1950s, so I'm not sure how realistic this assumption is.

It seems like the best thing to do would be to measure the difference between the measurement of choice (daily high, presumably, since we're in the business of talking about black - swan high - temperature events this time of year) and the trend line rather than a flat baseline.

We are still talking about calculations from very simple models here, not real measurements of actual photons in the actual atmosphere over actual time (always missing from the greenhouse effect calculations — time is a fundamental component of it).

Dear Nir Shaviv, I would be glad to receive your comment about the recent paper from Andrew C. Overholt et al 2009 ApJ 705 L101 - L103 doi: 10.1088 / 0004 - 637X / 705 / 2 / L101 TESTING THE LINK BETWEEN TERRESTRIAL CLIMATE CHANGE AND GALA Does it mean - the spiral arm mechanism you suggest does nt fit - can some other mechanism explain your measurements and hypothesis - does this have an impact on the cosmic ray climate theory or not If we talk about the paradox of the faint young sun, imho its still an issue that any mechanism solving the problem of the major ice ages occuring each 140 million years in the last billion, does nt work for the first 3 billion years.

We talk about how to customize interior measurements to your own size, while still staying safe and comfortable.

After spending several paragraphs detailing how the truth can not possibly be determined due to the difficulty of obtaining reliable measurements, you now talk about obvious lies.

Now, I'm not talking about the people who read the measurements, report their algorithms, and the results, necessarily.

The simplest is what Jones was talking to, while what Tamino was talking about is a more sophisticated ARMA measurement.

BTW, since we're talking about TOB, I don't like that you use mean or average temp trends, at least min and max are real measurements, not the the average of the two values.

Others have talked about what this might look like — regional impacts, measurement quality, reduced funding to GCM modeling (consistent with their strength in testing subsystems rather than forecasting climate), and more empirical work and modeling of those systems that have a large impact on areas of risk.

assuming what you say about skeptics changing topic as you describe is accurate, and at this point I do we are talking about data that is less than 200 years old, out of which extraordinary claims are made as to how that data relates to distant past and future trends tough sell assuming that all adjustments to the data are scientifically sound, It is very difficult for me to believe that measurements that have gone through so many iterations can be trusted to.0 and.00 in most other sciences, I doubt they would tough sell (the photo of the thermometer is downright funny) in terms of goal post moving I observe predicted heat being re-branded as «missing» a prediction of no snow re-branded as more snow a warming world re-branded to a «warm, cold, we don't know what to expect» world topped off with suggestions that one who thinks the above has some sort of psychological disorder extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence especially when you are teaching children that their world is endangered

So how can we possibly start talking about anthropogenic forcings and surface temperature changes wrought by same when we don't even know to + -5 C what the average temperature of the earth should be due to our albedo measurements being so imprecise and having no bloody idea how, when, and why the earth's average albedo varies.

I was not talking about Angstrom's solar radiation measurements, even though you mentioned Angstrom's experiment being conclusive, since it's Koch's experiment, as stated above, that was mainly used to argue for saturation.

I apologize for repeating those links, but they are talking about the reality of measurements, not just calculations.

FWIW: Rattus is talking about Song, Y. T., and F. Colberg (2011), Deep ocean warming assessed from altimeters, Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment, in situ measurements, and a non-Boussinesq ocean general circulation model, J. Geophys.

If you want to talk about the actual measurements we can do that, or if you want to talk about the simplified model I started this thread with we could also do that.

Whether we are talking about machine entanglement, overextension injury, slip - and - fall, vehicle accident, falling from height or falling object injury, all employees have to be aware of potential dangers in the working area and take safety measurements.

Professor Rosemary Calder, Director of the Australian Health Policy Collaboration, talks about the four elements she sees as key to any health policy framework: focus on risk factors, Amartya Sen's capability framework, regular measurement of population health and the transformational urban planning of Gil Penalosa that looks to make cities great for 8 and 80 year olds.

In this presentation, Dr. William Larson talks about ongoing research on the measurement of residential land prices at the ZIP code level for the United States.

In this presentation, Dr. William Larson talks about ongoing research on the measurement of residential land prices at the ZIP code level for the U.S.