Sentences with phrase «talking about molecules»

If you talking about molecules rather flour, shouldn't you be talking about Rayleigh Scattering rather than Tyndall effect?

We're talking about molecules and biochemistry.

Also, we had a great time talking about molecules and why borax makes crystals while we were doing these.

Not exact matches

Obviously I am not talking about the mechanical motion of the planets or the rumpus of atoms and molecules, but about the eternal beingness of intelligent, purposing, seeking life.

This point, combined with the previous one, means that he can talk about the causal influence, for example, of molecules within the cell upon the cell's series of living occasions, which can for practical purposes be regarded as the «cell as a whole,» and he can speak about the returned causal influence of the living occasions upon the molecular constituents.

Steve: So you might have a gene for a particular brain receptor or, I think what you talk about in the article is not actually the structure of the receptor molecule, but the amount of receptors that you actually produce?

Theoreticians tend to talk about structure of molecules in terms of molecular orbital theory (wave theory) and say that curly arrows are a fiction.

Zemer Gitai, a microbiologist at Princeton, remembers talking with Huang and Wingreen about a question that microbiologists were stuck on: How are molecules oriented in bacterial cell walls?

«It's hard to say that what you see in one system can be translated to another system because you are talking about different molecules, and each one has to be processed according to the functionality you want at the end.»

Anyone who seriously proposes that there is a force beyond gene expression, signaling molecules, differential adhesion, and those kinds of mechanisms, just doesn't know what they are talking about.

When researchers talk about channel selectivity, they're referring to the ability of peptides or small molecules to turn off only one particular sodium channel.

«Our results are very exciting ─ we are not just talking about one molecule in one particular pathogen but rather a building block which is shared by thousands of common virulence factors produced by many major pathogenic bacteria.

«When scientists talk about genes «for» this or that molecule, trait, or disease, they are being fanciful,» argues Hubbard.

And really this is a wonderful chemistry story in many ways as it describes how if you create conditions that you know could have existed, that were plausible to exist, then you watch what comes out of it; and then you ask the next question, «Well then how could, for instance, you know, how could these lipid molecules we were just talking about break apart to form new cells?»

If several thousand new building blocks become commercially available, it may not be too much of an exaggeration to talk about 3D printing of small molecules.

PD - 1 was clearly the most talked - about molecule at the conference, prompting one scientist to confess, «I feel like an exhausted T cell.»

(Since we're talking about IR radiation, the quantum states involved are the vibrational states of molecules rather than the electronic states of atoms, but the fundamental principles are the same.)

So now the actual thyroid hormone — when we talk about what your mitochondria wants — the type of sparkplug they want to fuel the engine, it wants T3 which is this amino acid terasine with three molecules of iodine on it.

Candace Pert «s book «Molecules of Emotion» talks about the biochemistry between the molecules in our body and our Molecules of Emotion» talks about the biochemistry between the molecules in our body and our molecules in our body and our emotions.

In an interview with IGN, the people that make up Media Molecule talked about everything from the supposed sequel to copyright infringement to even the slow sales LBP has seen since its debut.

A few months ago, the co-founder of Media Molecule Mark Healy, talked about how he wouldn't mind working on a PSP version of LBP and even thought about how the game would work on a handheld:

He never talks about an IR photon hitting a CO2 molecule, and what occurs when that happens — if this is the mechanism that causes heating, how does it do it?

(This is never said in simple terms, physicians talk always about rotation and vibration of molecules and photons emission which is not very clear for most people).

Boris: «should they talk about the IR absorbtion from such molecules as N2 ″ Yes.

For instance, should they talk about the IR absorption from such molecules as N2?

As for the emission, we are talking typically about 10ⁿ molecules with n of the order of 20.

Now are you claiming you can take a molecule with a certain kinetic energy (which is what temperature is a measurement of), and raise it 17 kilometers above the Earth (increasing its potential energy by 4664 Joules if we're talking about a mole of N2) without inputting more energy, and have it maintain that same kinetic energy, that same temperature?

You already have the idea, I'm sure, because it is part of e.g. N&Z except they talk about the absorption cross-section of the earth, not a molecule.

But we're talking here about very very small molecules that are way up high up in the sky performing these steps in time on the order of 100 picoseconds (10 GHz for you nerds out there).

He's talking about net quantities, not individual molecules.

At these kinds of temperatures, and they are talking about near 200 K, those molecules are rotating like heck if they are in a vapor, or at least oscillating a lot if in a fluid because of all the thermal energy, but supercooling to those temperatures without freezing is unlikely.

No where did I make any statement that is inconsistent with this; it is the reason we talk about the «15 micron» or 666 cm ^ -1 degenerate bending mode of the linear CO2 molecule.

Now Ray PH in his article did say that this aspect of coninua emission from gases was not well understood (so I guess I'm in some really great company), but he talked about the colliding molecules «possibly» forming some, I suppose you could call it a super molecule that had its own energy levels for the duration of the collision interraction.

But then you really aren't talking about the absorption / emission spectrum of your pure molecule, are you?

But here you are talking about «blackbody radiation» doesn't that imply that the wavelength emitted will not be specific to the molecule but will, instead, be a function of the temperature.