We're
talking about nuclear energy and climate change.
Not exact matches
In 2009 his lordship recognised after meeting French business leaders that France was better at setting strategic goals, citing examples such as
nuclear energy, high - speed rail and aerospace, then claiming that: «We have something to learn from continental practice [but] we are not
talking about public ownership.»
Two of the key negotiators, U.S. Secretary of
Energy Ernest Moniz and Atomic
Energy Organization of Iran head Ali Akbar Salehi, had earned doctorates in theoretical physics and
nuclear engineering, respectively, from top U.S. universities and were able to
talk directly with each other
about the technical details of the agreement.
He was
talking about moonshine — well the idea that you could actually make a bomb and you could tap this
nuclear energy.
But during the conference, Remo was struck by a realization already familiar to attendees more experienced in the subject: When you're
talking about deflection, nothing can match the
energy density of
nuclear weapons.
«Getting there, if you think
about nuclear fusion, is going to take some moments of discovery, some «aha» moments,» Synakowski said in his
talk, «Reimagining the Possible: Scientific Transformations Shaping the Path Towards Fusion
Energy.»
We can continue to
talk and
talk and
talk about how to cope, adapt, adjust; provide formulas for
energy solutions, debate
nuclear verses solar, but the fact remains the world is warming.
Even after the amount of
energy efficiency that we're
talking about, California would still need to build [the equivalent of *] one and a half to two new
nuclear plants every year through 2050.
German policy leaders have
talked about a transition away from fossil fuels and
nuclear energy — an Energiewende — since the 1980s.
We've been
talking about Diablo Canyon, the future of
nuclear power and climate change in California with David Baker, reporter for the San Francisco Chronicle, Michael Shellenberger, the pro-
nuclear advocate, Dian Grueneich an
energy expert at Stanford and John Geesman an anti-
nuclear activist.
Meanwhile, Trump has also
talked about zeroing out all federal research and development for clean
energy, which would include work the Department of Energy is doing on solar, wind, nuclear power, efficiency, electric cars, batteries, and more, including the cutting - edge research being done at ARP
energy, which would include work the Department of
Energy is doing on solar, wind, nuclear power, efficiency, electric cars, batteries, and more, including the cutting - edge research being done at ARP
Energy is doing on solar, wind,
nuclear power, efficiency, electric cars, batteries, and more, including the cutting - edge research being done at ARPA - E.
For example, some groups are definitely upset regarding current
talk about nuclear plant increases, an unwanted side effect of CO2 mitigation in highly
energy - dependent economies.
Utilities are not even
talking about nuclear in their
energy resource plans.
We can
talk about implementing renewables and
nuclear and improved
energy efficiency technologies from here until Sunday, but when you put the numbers in, they won't do the job alone.