Sentences with phrase «talking about our religious»

Now, if you want to talk about religious theory, that's a different definition, as religious theory is based on belief and assumption and written statements that can not be verified or proven without having faith and belief.

She talks about religious persecution by state churches yet like so many evangelicals she really means that the evangelicals should be the state church in America.

I am talking about their religious values / morals / laws and how they should be kept out of our nation's legal system.

Ted said: «I am talking about their religious values / morals / laws and how they should be kept out of our nation's legal system.»

Am sick and tired of this talk about the religious and the non religious things being taken as an excuse to squeeze crashing down those nations or countries... innocent peaceful people are the first to pay the price in such conflicts and wars..

Lets vote for Romney who talks about religious abuse and yet his religion is abusing the religion of others continually... bet he does nt suspend his money to them... they just wait till people are dead then baptise them... this is an extremist religion and not one we want for president

Talk about religious devotion.

At one point, he paused and began to talk about the religious nature of the medical school.

Talk about religious history!

I started out talking about religious vs atheist violence in recent years.

Thus, when we talk about religious boundaries, to a certain extent, we also include cultural boundaries.

And we have not even started to talk about religious and sectarian wars.

One can not really talk about religious ethics, then, unless one is willing sometimes to forget about ethics and focus on other, «higher» things.

I don't see any good coming from banning religious expressions, however I do believe we need to include ALL religions when we are talking about religious representation for this site.

If you are turned away in a nation that talks about religious freedom and «tolerance» (ie: bare minimum effort) then you can start with appeals and lobbying, it's a long way to the point where the squabbling should begin.

Athiests always talk about religious intolerance as an example of how terrible religions are, yet here they are, the biggest bunch of hateful people attacking other people's beliefs because they don't believe.

So she turned her attention to the grotesque, the perverse, the unacceptable — as a way of talking about religious questions.

How people talk about their religious and spiritual lives: is integrally related to the survival of faith itself.

Fitzgerald's image suggests that talk about a religious mainline is increasingly problematic and that those of us who think of ourselves as mainliners ought to find more realistic images of who we are.

Proudfoot's dilemma presumes that just such a pure account of religious experience is claimed by all theologians who talk about religious experience; but this simply does not apply to American radical empiricists who assumed that experience is always already an interdependent combination of facts and values, objects and subjects.

It is interesting that people who use Leviticus against the gay community forget the part that talks about religious sacrifices, making women sleep in tents outside during their period, the dietary restrictions placed on them and how to cleanse a leper, all of which appear in Leviticus.

You're talking about religious oppression, I'm talking about spiritual experience.

They can even urge the schools to talk about religious freedom and to discuss the role of religion in national life.

I refrain from reading comments since most commentators, especially when talking about religious issues, trash talk or belittle anyone who does not agree with their opinions.

«When you talk about religious discrimination of Christians alone, it does not help us,» he said.

You are talking about the religious ritual of «Holy Matrimony».

It's a contrast to the way the other Mormon candidate in the race for the Republican presidential nomination, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, has talked about his religious faith.

If you are in the American political system or others then you can talk about religious faith and people say «yes, fair enough», and it is something they respond to quite naturally.»

He explained: «It's difficult to talk about religious faith in our political system.

If students are to navigate public life, they must know how to talk about their religious differences.

Talking about the religious schools in particular, he said parents were sending their children because they were not satisfied with mainstream education «because music, for example, could be taught or creative subjects which they disapprove of».

If that's open to constitutional challenge, well, then the world of education funding is radically changed, and we won't be talking about religious school vouchers.

Or feels like Zelda is the place to talk about religious tolerance or class differences.

Or at least don't like me talking about religious things.

He talks about religious groups being the oldest organizations in society, by far, and owning 8 percent of the earth's surface, begging the question of why wouldn't you work with them to save nature.

In today's interview, Janet defines religious child maltreatment, we talk about religious authoritarian cultures; discuss examples of religiously motivated physical, emotional and sexual abuse, and medical neglect; talk about the laws that are in place that encourage religious child maltreatment, and discuss some ways that social service providers can talk with parents about authoritarian religious communities and religious child maltreatment.

Not exact matches

From religious fervor to reasonable analysis is never the way you want the talk about your «gee - whiz» product to progress.

Why are you listening to black clerics over this issue, Blacks are having more kids out of wed lock than whites, they are also like white, living in sin, but the church's say nothing about having babies without a husband or sitting in church and living in sin, talk about glass houses, and besides the marriages are Cival marriage not religious marriage, what a bunch of hipocrites..

I personally hear the atheists I know complain more than the religious people about others talking about their beliefs, could just be the people I know though.

Whenever I hear religious people talk about what they believe, I always find myself amazed at how crazy they are.

Religious leaders free themselves from the obligation of talking about evil, by pretending that it's only a matter of free will and people can choose what they want and the consequences are only personal («between you and God»).

Whether the critiques provided are correct or wrong, religious TV and media gives us the opportunity to reflect on our way of life and talk with others about religion.

For years Osteen has been dinged by religious critics as a theological lightweight - for talking too much about sunshine and not enough about sin.

Even if you take the religious aspect out of it, it is still interesting those on their death bed want to talk about family.

I'm talking about someone who is an anti-theist and patrols religious blogs searching out Christians to challenge their beliefs.

The kind of reasonable, sound THINKING theology and religious / faith ideas those of us as are here talking about, simply doesn't lend itself to a pop culture.

You are free to speak out about you religious beliefs or lack thereof, but this is why I don't talk about mine.

I remember watching his science videos in elementary school but now whenever I see him on the news talking about science it seems like he is politicizing science (when it comes to climate change) and promoting evolution as the only option to the creation of the world to try and discredit the religious community.

I listen to how they talk about matters of faith, religion, what they watch on their favorite religious tv programs, often listening as well to their radios playing their favored «Christian music» radio stations in the background, what are in the lyrics.

you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.