Sentences with phrase «talking about problems on»

During meetings, members «check in,» talking about problems on the job, while other members offer strategies that might help them.

Indeed, I requested PC code and got none, and wound up buying the game on Xbox One this morning to review, although I'm beginning to wish I'd purchased it on Steam in order to talk about these problems on a more personal level.

Not exact matches

Therapists ask open ended questions to encourage users to talk about their problems, to gain a little clarity on the root of their problems.

Leaders thrive when they strengthen relationships with their people by spending more one - on - one time with them to hear their suggestions, ideas, problems and issues as well as talking about performance issues and their work.

Instead, talk about the implications of their actions indirectly by discussing the impact the problem has had on you, your feelings, or the business.

Your Gchat may perpetuate a problem (because you're constantly talking about it) that may have been fleeting had you carried on with what you were being paid to do with your time at work.

What Facebook might be willing to do, however, is to talk a bit more about this problem and potential solutions for it, instead of relying on the algorithm or its own secret internal processes to take care of it.

I'm talking about caring about a problem or issue and getting in on the ground floor to change it.

Of course, when you're talking about L.A., there are always bureaucratic problems, but there's no denying the situation reflects badly on Goodell, too.

Understanding what's really going on inside a company under fire is tricky because the people closest to the problems are usually the ones with the most to lose by talking frankly about them.

On the former I mentioned a video that I shot for This Week in VC talking about how Farb Nivi solved this problem:

Basil Peters has a series of posts up on Angel blog that talks about the problems of Convertible Notes for Angel Investing, suggests Exchangeable Shares for Angel Investors, and even provides a One Page Term Sheet for Angel Investors.

(Note now that we are not talking about a free banking system — I want to make a point about fractional reserve systems in general and show how the problem is that the system isn't free, not that it's based on fractional reserves.)

But, in my experience, sometimes the best way to keep communication healthy and open is to go to bed angry and then talk about it the next morning when you've had enough sleep to know that leaving the milk out in the car probably wasn't a veiled act of aggression meant to symbolize every problem in the relationship, but rather just the sort of mistake anyone would make while distracted by a fascinating story on NPR.

The problem is that Romney not talking about his policies won't stop Obama and his team from talking about Romney's policies and anecdotal non sequiturs won't convince people that Romney must be on their side.

It reported the surge of young men experiencing erection problems and in their revealing video Brought Up on Porn, young people talked openly about the negative impact porn has had on their sexuality and relationships.

I'm just saying if the poster wants to talk about heterosexual relations are a requirement for healthy kids, start by working on the social problems these hypocrites have created and stop using it to prove that Gay Marriage is bad.

When AMIA leaders talked to me about their departure from the Episcopal Church, they focused more on the doctrinal problems represented by Bishop Spong than on the sexual issues raised by the election of gay bishop V. Gene Robinson.

That's why, for example, I don't understand how anybody would want to be on a panel at one of those political luncheons where they talk about why the private sector ought to handle this or that social problem.

The problem is that people who have spent years talking about grace, reading books on grace, and going to conferences on grace are suddenly faced with situations in which they need to be gracious and, instead, become... nasty.

It is so easy to overlook the people who clean, the store clerks, the person we're talking to on the phone about the problem with our bill with their company.

I do nt have a problem with other religions, I think people on both sides of the issue need work together and talk about this.

We'll talk more about Young's take on «The Problem of Evil» as we continue our discussion over the next few weeks.

After that start talking only about religion, God, cultural values, abortion, family values, «common man», and blame all the problems the country faces on liberals, Obama, France, Europe, the Chinese, outsourcing,... in short everyone else, except themselves.

Can I suggest that in the midst of what we talk about with love and being centred on people we have this age old problem of human nature in that ALL of us like to feel powerful, secure and approved of.

You capture perfectly in one image what many of here, and on your FB page, talk about, but at times have problems putting it into words.

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.

I, on the other hand, am more of a salty crunchy snack kind of person... I have no problems getting through a bag of sea salted pita chips dunked in spicy hummus... okay, let's not talk about it (I have recently discovered I have a bit of an addiction...).

I haven't talked about this much on the blog yet, but reintroducing wheat into my diet has been a bit of a problem for my tummy.

There is so much talk about getting wingers and strikers that we are all forgetting our stats from last season.It was not scoring goals which was the problem (thanks to Alexis whom people have already started demonising for being ambitious) but its conceding goals which is our problem.So shouldn't the club be more focussed on getting a CDM and a CB.

We should be doing our talking on the pitch, the arsenal way and not worrying about other clubs injury problems which should benefit us!

Whoever it was was talking about the upcoming Manchester derby and having talked about Chelsea's problems, they said that the game between Man United and Man City was between the two sides that could now go on to win the title.

The problem I have with views like this is that it's all centered on pretty sizable factors that are then talked about nonchalantly to create the impression we're closer than we are.

Anyway though, talking about the Watford game, when we couldn't beat them when it actually mattered in the FA cup, feels like going over and over again on problems I've pointed out here so many times.

The problem with the high end talent you're talking about (Jones, Collins, Butler, etc.) eventually get pricey and Belichick would rather spread $ 10 million to three players like Harmon, Chung and Guy rather than spend $ 10 million on one Butler or Jones.

I am getting fed up of writing about our problems at Arsenal and I just wish I could see some positives things to talk about Arsenal but when all we keep on doing is losing games scandalously, what are we supposed to do?

I have heard people talking about a staleness that can creep in when the players are dealing with the same man at the top for so long and to be perfectly honest I am struggling to remember when the problems both on and off the pitch for Arsenal went on for so long.

I am not talking about the Arsenal transfer rumours that have been doing the rounds of the football media recently, suggesting that the Arsenal and Chile international star Alexis Sanchez has become increasingly frustrated with life as a Gunner and is keen on a move away from Arsenal in the summer transfer window, although if they turn out to be true it would certainly represent a major problem for Arsene Wenger.

Of course conventionally we expect teams with relatively better players to be favourites to win the competitions.However, football since it's inception has proven to us that it's not only teams with better players that win the cups.Looking at the cups small teams have won there can be no excuses for us in that light when talking about the fact that based on spending we have no right to win things as compared to those who spend big.We've had teams good enough to win the EPL in the past but for some problems we couldn't.

But he also talked about the need for some serious summer spending on transfers by the Gunners to avoid the problems the team has suffered this season happening again next year.

On that subject, I do have a problem when people talk about the money spent on players in transfer fees and wageOn that subject, I do have a problem when people talk about the money spent on players in transfer fees and wageon players in transfer fees and wages.

On the bright side, Howedes would solve our defensive problems (CB / LB / RB, talk about versatility), plus it would allow more game time for Ox / Carzola / Campbell to compete for that LW spot.

He was his typical sharp self and there were no elbow problems to report, which means we can start to talk about the next important date on Lee's schedule: the one in which he's traded to a contender.

«Mahrez's problem is he has talked about a move to Arsenal for two summers now but on both occasions he has had three years remaining on his contract.

I confess, I may be part of the problem as I often talk about students needing to take rigorous classes, adding activities to bulk up their resumes as well as of course, continuing to work on their fitness, strength, so on and so forth.

«Even when he... is talking about a double or triple, it seems like «No problem, I'll get a birdie on the next hole.»

If Mr wenger built a team who never lost it tells me he can build a team remember a team consists of 11 different characters with different back grounds beliefs and aspirations and problems with another 11 to back them up I remember years ago the press used to talk about arsenal and not having English players on the field never the less I know off our own fatalities as such we were somehow always coming up little short by injuries to such Edwardo vanpercie and even gas diaby ramsy rosiscky carzola and many more and others that did nt seem to gel well I am not blind and I know we are not doing well but to suggest that Mr wenger docent have a clue is totally preposterous and disrespectful

Nearby, a crazed man with a speech impediment and possibly a methamphetamine problem was talking a mile a minute about the 54 points Michael Jordan had hung on the New York Knicks that afternoon.

A few days ago I posted a comment on here and noted how AFC always seem to lose ground and our way once the heat is on... how we lack the mental strength and character to deal with pressure of maintaining a lead once we are top of the table and how we ALWAYS crumble when it matter most... i also noted how we ALWAYS seem to regain our mojo soon as we are out of contention for every important competition, when we go on some amazing winning streak, just in time to snatch the 4th place trophy... as is the norm on here and many other AFC fans forum i got member jumped down my throat, talking about negative fans, talking about new players we have and how that problem was a thing of the past....

that is the big question.How long do you want to keep on living with problems in the team without attempting to solve them.Without a doubt you and I know this and we know what we must do.You must ensure that you have the right players before talking about cohesion and injuries.As at now I look at the arsenal team and say if arsenal do nt solve their problems it will be worse and continue to haunt them.We need quality in the team as much as cohesion and staying injury free is important.Quality is however the most important.That differentiates a bigger club from a lesser club yes «quality».