Sentences with phrase «talking about the time given»

Not exact matches

And when she gave her reason to the media, Leslie didn't talk about spending more time with her family.

It is anomalous to see financial journalists talk about the futility of market timing in the stock market but then give the impression houses should be sold to avoid an anticipated collapse in prices.

Sure, there's not much time for talking during a yoga class, but stretching your body while flying through the air in a giant hammock suspended from the ceiling will surely give you and your date something to talk about once the class is over.

It may take a few tries, but most people will probably be willing to give you thirty minutes of time to talk about an issue they care about.

[Milt] Any time friends of ours talk about philanthropy, I tell them that the Schwab Charitable Fund is high integrity, it works, it makes giving easy, it makes the portfolio decisions easy.

When people talk about having a flexible job, they often say it would lower their stress levels, improve their work - life balance, and give them more time for their personal lives.

It was some time ago now that wearing activewear as your everyday casual wear became accepted in society and we are sure glad this happened because it gives us the chance to talk about one of Australia's fastest growing activewear retailers... Rockwear.

Attending MADE gives us inspiration and time to talk to others about great ideas and products.

So given that the global earnings / economic cycle remains intact, I don't think it's time to talk seriously about a potential bear market emerging.

For real estate, Owen talks about purchasing in premium locations (even if that means paying extra, and always think long term) and gives real life examples of properties in Vancouver and how they have appreciated over time.

«We don't want to be talking about X where, one way or another, you get a slant on it by the time the interview's done... We could change our mind next week or a month later, and somebody's out there that thinks we're giving investment advice.

We promised another article about peer - to - peer trading, but given the events of yesterday, when the Winklevoss Twins had their Bitcoin ETF denied and panic selling ensued, it's a good time to talk about what to do when the prices drop sharply in a short period of time.

What people are talking about today: Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, waiting five days to address the scandal roiling his company, embarked on a very belated damage - control tour that included writing a blog post and giving interviews to Recode, Wired, The New York Times and CNN.

And they pull it off without having to give away the movies storyline or talk about everyone's resume and do a bunch of other boring things we feel like we've seen a million times now that crowd funding has been around for a while.

Talking about natural / God - given rights I'm all for, but I'm not for a campaign that suggests that we need to go back to a time before anyone named Roosevelt.

But in an interview, he talked openly about the change he experienced in his heart upon giving his life to Christ, saying that time on the field «was no longer for myself, for those worldly desires and goals» but instead «to give everything to Him [God].»

I did my best to hide my doubts, but there were times when I would be about preach or give a worship talk on campus that I just couldn't.

Such a fascinating book deserves more time than we can give it, but I'd like to start off by talking about the current attitudes about life after death that have come to dominate much of Western Christianity and that Wright seeks to evaluate.

If you knew how many of the «debaters» in this forum were paid shills sitting in boiler room type operations all day basically getting into character and arguing the agenda their boss gave them you would spend less time debating them and more time talking about their little known but thriving industry.

As NdT said very well, «you don't talk about the spherical earth with NASA and then say let's give equal time to the flat - earthers.»

I think the last time I went was just disturbing... The priest talked for 45 minutes about a «lesson» from the bible about giving to the poor, about giving even when you yourself don't have much, to help the ones who really need help.

Existentialist theologians, for example, seem to forget entirely that human existence, about which they talk so much, has a location in time and space and in a given part of the natural order.

Right, that's why we have to go to a building once, twice or several times a week to sing songs about being washed in blood and hear a guy give us a pep talk to reinforce our non belief while he takes our money.

Jeremy: every time I bring up a question they don't seem to be able to answer, they revert to talking about their experience (vision, dream, inner feeling, etc.) which proved to them the truth of what they believe, and then they tell me that if I really want to know the truth, I should pray for wisdom and ask God to give me a similar experience to reveal the truth to me.

Anyway, about this time, the evangelist lady got up to give her talk to the kids, and so our booth had to shut down so there would be no distractions.

As I have conversed with my Mormon co-workers about their faith, every time I bring up a question they don't seem to be able to answer, they revert to talking about their experience (vision, dream, inner feeling, etc.) which proved to them the truth of what they believe, and then they tell me that if I really want to know the truth, I should pray for wisdom and ask God to give me a similar experience to reveal the truth to me.

Basically, what has happened with CST is comparable to what has happened with marriage and family: We spend a lot of time talking about contraception and abortion and bioethical dilemmas, and unfortunately we must do so, given the gravity of these evils and the obsessions of our day — but as a result we can fail to see, or at least fail to communicate to others, the profound truth of the sacrament of matrimony, which is the foundation of all the rules and prohibitions.

Every time he gets a camera in his face, he starts talking about Jesus and giving glory to God for letting him play football.

It's time to give people the space and freedom to talk openly about depression without stigma, without shame, and without embarrassment.

This comes in the next section, where Cyprian, quoting sections of Isaiah 43: 18 - 21, which talks about giving «water to my chosen people,» emphatically states that «you must realise that every time that water is named by itself in the Holy Scriptures, there is a prophetic allusion to baptism.»

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

«We need to prepare our children for the day when we're not there and we do that gradually giving them more and more responsibility as they get older and we do it by talking about them and by spending time with them - putting those boundaries in place.»

Interesting timing given that, just this morning, I posted something that talks about what it means to embrace or identity in Christ and no longer care about how the broader world around us responds.

I can not believe that a pastor would admit to not talking about tough economic times and greed because he or she is concerned that parishoners will stop giving to the church.

It's hard not to sound like a broken record when talking about the topic, but I find just as much romance as I do practicality in eating what grows at any given time of the year.

Christopher Joye When fund managers start talking about how expensive large parts of the market are getting at a time when we have record low borrowing rates, it gives you pause.

http://responsibleeatingandliving.com/shows/Ask-A-Vegan20120311.mp3Podcast: Play in new window Download3 / 11/2012 — Join me on my second live broadcast from REAL Worldwide Radio where I give time saving tips with online shopping, talk about the economics of dairy farming, where to get your healthy lignans and delicious things to do with ginger and shallots.

I've talked about my love / obsession with my Vitamix before, so now it's time to give the spiralizer the spotlight.

I love laughing at all of his silly jokes, cooking his food, riding my bike alongside his, listening to him talk about what is bringing him stoke, and help when life is giving him a hard time.

As long as we're talking about stretching the rules, fairness requires that we give equal time to those notorious reprobates at Boise State, who have had to schlep a bit of baggage to their new conference, the Mountain West.

but, im ok with this vardy transfer... it shows us many things: 1) wenger is changing, something some of us have been demanding for a long time; 2) it shows that wenger is taking risks: think about it, he is buying a men for a not cheap price, knowing he could not getting anything after, with a future sell i mean... this is an act that shows wengers intentions to win something, the buy is not motivated by any financial or economic reason but only for a «get the f epl once again» reason... this is an act that shows us hungry, even if we fail, we could said we try... first ever, we really try; 3) finally but very important... vardy is the kind of player we need... he is a warrior, a fighter... he has character... look at how he celebrate his goals... full of energy... he, like alexis, can motivate the team when the things are not going in our way (something wenger cant do because of his age and because he has never been an active coach on the pitch)... the vardy transfer, if it finish well, is a demostration of a change, and a good one... lets take care of winning things and do nt look the economic side for once... vardy is a bit old, but we can give a chance to welbeck after maybe, or akpom... u are not thinking about the future when we talk about ibra... guys: u complain when wenger do nt spend or because he is always looking for the bargain when u are the guys who has to pay the very expensive tickets... u complain when wenger buy the always for the future guy... like morata... stop to complain for everything and be consequent with yourself... i would love auba, but it is not going to happen... lukaku is awesome but the asking price is stupid... lets try with vardy, give us the throphy..

Fans talk about manly man stuff and how demoralizing it is the see the other team just run the ball time after time down the field, but what is truly demoralizing to a team and truly deflates a squad is giving up big, easy, fast, touchdown passes.

The game also saw the debut of young forward Kazaiah Sterling, a player who fans were talking about after the match had ended, with some fans questioning about the amount of game time the forward was given by Pochettino.

You want to talk about a cluster fuck, it's hard enough to move the ball on that defense, but giving up yards because of presnap penalties when the Panthers already couldn't get their running game going almost guaranteed they would end up facing yet another third - and - long every time it happened.

i mean look at post match reviews and how great they are to share views... but now the quality of the writings is poor and we are left running up and down articles that usually have nothing valuable to say... can you just select and post the well written ones and give us time to talk about them.

Every time I hear someone talk shit about Arsenal I get defensive and go all out to defend them, but yet we give them all the ammunition in the world to justify their statements.

Yes, he only joined in the summer and might want to give his new club some time, but come on, it's Arsenal we're talking about here.

A club run by joe Lewis lol when was the last fuking time Spurs won a trophy give it a fuking rest Wenger has won more trophies then spuds in their whole fuking history Sick of plastic fans constantly knocking the manager and players like you are fuking genius experts in knowing all about football We have the worst fan base in football a bunch of ingrates Why would any top player come and join Arsenal when they see how fans treat their own players like ozil Lol at people talking about Spurs and pool fukers don't win any trophies but their fans stay loyal ours turn nasty every game werther we win or lose It won't change even if we get a new manager they will turn on him at first defeat What we need is for the vocal minority of plastic key board fans to fuk off and stop bringing the club down Coyg

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

In the days since then, the Ravens have been talking publicly about their private deliberations over signing Colin Kaepernick to upgrade the No. 2 QB spot and give them a reliable starter should Flacco miss more time during the season.