@Kenneth Garrett I think we're
talking apples and oranges.
It's not wanting it both ways if we're
talking apples and oranges.
you are
talking apples and oranges.
That's a great word but sometimes full of so many shades of meaning that we may end up
talking apples and oranges.
But you're
talking apples and oranges.
Not exact matches
fishon... we're
talking about
apples and oranges.
If you
and I are
talking about the best fruit,
and you are thinking «
apple» but I am thinking «
orange» but we both keep saying «fruit» the discussion will get nowhere.
Talk about
apples and oranges.
Lynch was also careful to avoid
talking about it as «civil rights,» since many black lawmakers found that to be
apples and oranges.
Talk about comparing «
Apple»
and orange.
Your system works for you,
and that's great — but we're comparing
apples to
oranges to
talk about why my decisions won't be good ones in another system.
To refute this last statement by
talking about ocean heat content is comparing
apples and oranges.
Without a uniform way to
talk about these trade - offs, they are stuck comparing
apples and oranges.
We're
talking about
apples and Gates wants to switch the subject to
oranges in other words.
Dear Whoever, We are
talking about
apples and oranges.