Not exact matches
For the
talk about the natural changes of human life over the years, together with what externally happened there, is not in essence any different from
talking of
plant or of
animal life.
I think about that scene when I hear the way many of my environmentalist friends
talk about genetically modified organisms,
or GMOs, an ill - fitting term that has come to stand for
plants,
animals and other living things whose genes have been directly manipulated in the lab using the techniques of modern biotechnology.
But when most people
talk about fossils, they mean a specific subsection of this group — fossils in which the shape of the
animal or plant has been preserved, while the actual organic matter of its body is gone.
I don't consider economics
or sustainability as a consideration when
talking about diet though but if you want to get technical,
animals exist in the wild all over the world, fruits and vegetable are artificially raised, meaning we have to
plant them, tend to them harvest them and they wouldn't exist without us.
They love
talking about the
plant and
animal life that surround our school and often spend their free time looking for bird
or animal tracks.
Talk about the characteristics of
plants and
animals mentioned in the book, and get students involved in writing characteristics on a whiteboard
or large piece of paper on the wall.
Lunch was always punctuated by a short
talk on
plant and
animal life
or the geologic formations we were sitting on.
And in these instances we're
talking about
plants,
animals,
or natural communities.
Let's not
talk about the «average advocate», many of those are far too taken with pretty faces
or perfectly formed flowers, not so interested in ugly
or slimy
animals or smelly
or prickly
plants.