Sentences with phrase «talking point in this post»

I discussed the «no statistically significant warming since 1995» talking point in this post.

Not exact matches

But the Washington Post's Glenn Kessler offers an alternative — and in our view, more credible — explanation for why the administration edited down the talking points, suggesting that the emails reveal a «bureaucratic knife fight» that pitted the State Department against the CIA.

And that has disturbing implications for freedom of the press, as Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo notes in a post:

He also contributes to publications like Time, Talking Points Memo, and the Huffington Post, and blogged for the Daily Kos when he was on deployment in Afghanistan in 2007.

Titled «Talking Points Embassy of U.S. in Colombia as Political Post for Ambassadorship,» the memo advised Trump not to choose a career diplomat to lead the embassy in Bogota.

Titled «Talking Point Embassy of U.S. in Colombia as Political Post for Ambassadorship,» the memo says the ambassadorship is «no ordinary post, but one with a major U.S. national security interest.&raPost for Ambassadorship,» the memo says the ambassadorship is «no ordinary post, but one with a major U.S. national security interest.&rapost, but one with a major U.S. national security interest.»

You talk about grammar checking in your second point then in your forth point say «using a keyword phrases along» — I find posts more believable when they practice what they preach.

Liberal Boomers, who seldom if ever seriously criticize the legions of conservative - demonizers in your midst, for this post I will mostly join Mr. Druckenmiller in accusing you outright, that is, I will act as if this was your premeditated plan motivated by selfish interest, and not a pattern of political self - delusion that you fell into, given the drip - drip - drip of Democrat talking points over the years, given your gleeful listening to those who dismissed conservatives as hateful dunces, so that you ceased to even consider the NUMBERS conservatives kept pointing to, and just kept on doggedly voting D.

Please anyone who responds to this don't name names; those of us familiar with the writing styles know which posts we're talking about and there's no point in stirring things.

We will talk more about predetermination and foreordination in the future posts about Unconditional Election and the Sovereignty of God, so I don't want to use a lot of room to discuss these issues here, except to say that Scripture, reason, and experience all seem to point pretty clearly to the fact that God expects us to make wise choices and holds us accountable for the choices and decisions we make.

Happy Jack — I didn't say there was a set of established morals for Atheists, in fact i noted that there was NOT a set of morals, if you want to know if Atheists have morals and where they come from you'd probably have to ask an atheist, my post was simply pointing to the fact that the dictators i was talking about did not have a specific set of morals telling them that Murdering millions of people was wrong.

A 92nd minute corner gave us the chance to steal all three points, and that we did, although there will be talk of Laurent Koscielny's final touch being with his hand... An Alexis Sanchez cross was whipped in, for Theo to knock toward the back - post, where Oxlade - Chamberlain and Laurent managed to scuffle the ball into the net, and with no time for Burnley to try and level proceedings.

I think that Arsene Wenger knows it as well, because he made a point of talking about and praising the ruthless streak that his players showed in the second half at the Liberty Stadium during his post match interview reported by the Arsenal website.

Talk about balance, these guys had three different starters post 20 or more points in their big Week 6 victory.

AGAIN he talks about the lack of finishing in his post game comments... doesn't he have no shame at one point when he says that?!

These two posts were in response to an email from a My Toddler Talks reader asking how to encourage her toddler to communicate with words rather than pulling and pointing.

If at any point you want to cry «uncle» — too many Lunch Tray posts showing up in your mailbox, a sudden desire to «de-friend» me on Facebook (or in real life), feeling the need to report me as a spammer — please email me using the Contact tab above and talk some sense into me.

Jose's overview story in today's Post hits on a couple of points frequently missing from the conversation when TV pundits talk about the lefty blogosphere:

Republican Harry Wilson, who, as a largely self - funding political newcomer, came within just under 4 percentage points of ousting Democratic state Comptroller Tom DiNapoli last fall, has not said anything publicly in response to a NY Post report that he's being talked up as a potential 2012 challenger to Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, but he already has at least one GOP county chairman in his corner.

Talking Points Memo then reached out to CNN, which confirmed that an incident had taken place in a statement it later sent to The Huffington Post.

I've talked in detail about the barbell press vs. dumbbell press for building chest size in previous posts, but I'll quickly summarize the main points here...

TG points out in the following post that the amounts we are talking about may be human - normal levels and not really «low» levels and that the levels in question show no harm: https://nutritionfacts.org/video/best-foods-to-improve-sexual-function/#comment-257117

I was going to do just that and then point the person to a great post from Tom Goff that talks about the dangers of low carbohydrate diets that was written once in regards to a different topic.

This is the fourth installment in a series of posts in which I am laying out the most salient points from my 2012 Real Food Summit talk, «Weston Price on Primitive Wisdom.»

This is the fifth installment in a series of posts in which I am laying out the most salient points from my 2012 Real Food Summit talk, «Weston Price on Primitive Wisdom.»

Because personal style is a big talking point, I'm going to to discuss your color palette in the next post!

The Inner Circle really prides itself firstly, on not being a gamified or gimmicky app which encourages respectful behaviour between users, and secondly, having some unique features such as the travel and spots features, and the wall on which users can post about up and coming Events, all things which better engage users, give them starting points of things to talk about on dates, as well as giving them a better experience in The Inner Circle's dating community.

In his blog The Elephant In The (Staff) Room — Why We Need To Talk About Teacher Wellbeing (The Huffington Post, 14th March 2017), Nick Haisman - Smith, Chief Executive at Family Links and the Nurturing Schools Network, makes the point that «it is impossible to support the social and emotional health of young people, if we as teachers do not attend to our own emotional health».

For example, on its website it has «Five Talking Points on Vouchers,» all of which I debunked in a January post.

The same post was highlighted in an article Diane Ravitch wrote for the Talking Points Memo titled «Did Michelle Rhee's Policies In D.C. Work?&raquin an article Diane Ravitch wrote for the Talking Points Memo titled «Did Michelle Rhee's Policies In D.C. Work?&raquIn D.C. Work?»

In this post, «5 Things Every Author Needs to Understand About Book Cover Design,» Brooke Warner talks about the importance of book cover design, including some of the points we discussed in the recent Wordherder meetinIn this post, «5 Things Every Author Needs to Understand About Book Cover Design,» Brooke Warner talks about the importance of book cover design, including some of the points we discussed in the recent Wordherder meetinin the recent Wordherder meeting.

In an earlier blog post we talked about the importance of developmental editing and why the focus on big - picture stuff — structure, book - spanning issues like plot or organization, character development, dialogue, and that sort of thing — needs to come first, before you spend too much time worrying about the finer points of style and wording.

In a previous post, we began talking about point of view, also known as «person.»

Since that first tax season she has written blog posts and talking points, edited content of all shapes and sizes, facilitated media interviews for the experts in The Tax Institute at H&R Block and supported the DIY team.

My second point is that if you mention a HELOC in your post you are not talking about the SM, you are just simply using leverage to invest.

We put together a list of common adoption myths, in the hopes that you can gently point friends toward this post when they talk about why they've got their heart set on buying.

I'll talk more about earning Rapid Rewards points in next week's post.

In a previous post, we talked about how much are Southwest Rapid Rewards points REALLY worth?

This is an very interesting point for me, on which I would like to talk about in more detail in a upcoming post.

There was actually a lot of talk about things related to your blogging points in the previous post at Web 2.0 this week.

Among those I received in 2014 was Christopher Keating's blog post «Update on NIPCC,» which contained the usual unsupportable talking points about crooked climate scientists and related think - tanks which supposedly also say cigarettes and 2nd hand smoke is harmless.

But as I said in my last post, this conclusion doesn't mean there's no point talking about the case.

As this blog as pointed out in the last Green Hops post (under «High Level Climate Change Talks»), technology transfer is a hot topic.

So when I say «energy innovation» policies, I'm not talking about a silver bullet, I'm talking about a suite of policies from R&D, demonstration, financing, deployment, and market - based that not only develop the clean tech we need, but creates a competitive market for them, and get those technologies to market quicker than if left alone.My concerns shared in the post are those that ignore the innovation piece and assume, to a point a you do, that price or regs or taxes will have not just an immediate impact but a LARGE impact.

In my last post, I observed that NOAA's Talking Points applied their new «adjustments» to supposedly prove that NOAA's negligent administration of the USHCN network did not «matter».

I'd just like to make sure I understood your post correctly: the common answer to the «contrarian talking point» that much of the observed recent climate change could just be caused by natural variability in the climate system is that this would imply, broadly speaking, heat being moved from the oceans to the atmosphere — whereas we observe the opposite, oceans storing heat.

An earlier post of the errors / misrepresentations in a recent Lorne Gunter column in the National Post has attracted a host of comments and a few that further debunk Gunter's passionately inaccurate talking poipost of the errors / misrepresentations in a recent Lorne Gunter column in the National Post has attracted a host of comments and a few that further debunk Gunter's passionately inaccurate talking poiPost has attracted a host of comments and a few that further debunk Gunter's passionately inaccurate talking points.

In my mind I amplified a few of your points as I think you might have — your post is quite succinct, and could be elaborated into a 20 minute talk very readily.

And I do mean really worn - out old talking points, I pointed straight to one of those in my March 17, 2014 blog post at item # 20 where I detailed the speaker's ignorance of his errors.

On 11/17/16, the NewsHour's guest analysis segment on the Ebell story ** (** see end of post) featured Vox writer David Roberts (formerly with Grist magazine, where one of his pieces channeled a Ross Gelbspan Talking Point), who said the following in only his second sentence about Ebell (full text & video here),