They also took on skeptical
talking points like, How do we know it's our CO2?
PR: Really, I thought we had agreed to spend December's marketing budget sponsoring CNN programming and dictating on - air
talking points like we did a few months ago.
I say that you are misinformed because you blindly parrot denialist
talking points like «Climate science is a young science,» and «The science is uncertain.»
Best case scenario he addresses the crowd with banal, meaningless
talking points like «We can grow the economy AND protect the climate.»
Not exact matches
It'll be interesting to see how Apple's
talks with the Canadian banks plays out, but at this
point it looks suspiciously
like someone is trying to negotiate through the media.
Not only do all these channels constantly
point to each other and give customers reason to engage with the company, Eat24 social media manager Patty Jordan says they make customers feel
like they're
talking with people, not a robot or business.
But senior State Department officials expressed concerns about those
talking points, arguing that they made it seem
like the State Department had ignored CIA warnings.
He also contributes to publications
like Time,
Talking Points Memo, and the Huffington Post, and blogged for the Daily Kos when he was on deployment in Afghanistan in 2007.
As Stowe Boyd
points out in «Metaphors Matter:
Talking About How We
Talk About Organizations,» an organization that functions
like a dynamic organism is better able to change and adapt.
This
point might seem semantic when we're
talking about resources that people uniformly value —
like money for example.
Finally, you should make a
point to
talk with existing business owners — ideally in the industry you'd
like to enter — who can speak from experience and offer invaluable advice on how to approach a purchase for the best results.
Use your minutes in a meeting well by preparing
talking points and questions that you'd
like to explore ahead of time.
«Make it a
point to sit down with your children and
talk about issues
like finances, retirement planning and elder care,» he said.
As a former Third
Point employee told journalist Nicholas Stein in 2007, Loeb «believes that if you embarrass a CEO in front of his friends at the club, make him feel
like people are
talking about him, you can exert change on his company.»
If it sounds
like Mayor Luke Bronin is
talking more boldly about a bankruptcy filing these days, it's because the numbers don't
point to much hope of avoiding a reorganization of the city's debts and liabilities, either in or out of bankruptcy...
I was thinking this the other day, when a lot of the Facebook executives get on Twitter and feel victim - y, they're doing their victim - y dance right now a lot of the time, and at one
point, Boz, Bosworth, when he said, «Maybe people will die,» that memo, and instead of being
like, «Oh god, we really have to be more mature about this,» their thing was, «We can't
talk now.»
An immodest proposition: If we're going to keep
talking about Stormy Daniels — and it certainly seems
like another stiletto will drop at some
point — we should try to better understand why her branding and brand messaging have been so successful.
If at some
point, Joe Anglin is interested in the Alberta Party, we'll
talk to him, just
like we're open to every Albertan who is fed up with the partisan nature of politics in Alberta.
Are you
talking about the clashes between immigrant cultures (
like the 5
Point gang wars) or the revivalist activities of the «second awakening?»
We do it every single day in the media where the main issue is ignored to promote a «
talking point» that favors the authors argument or criticism with some they do nt
like.
He was asked a question about the age of the earth which he did not answer, instead retreated to
talking points to pander to people
like you.
And when it finally came time to
talk to Dave and people
like that, it got to the
point where this is just another person that I have to
talk to.
I don't think there were or are ears willing to hear at that
point or this, anyway, but I really do appreciate you sharing this and Alex if you would
like to
talk to me personally, I am very open to that and I will answer all of your questions.
Like the part about women - blaming and shaming combined with the pastor digging up offenses from the past, referencing an emotional distance he feels from us as we leave, citing his own pastoral involvement and authority in the decisions of our lives up to this
point, threatening to
talk to the pastor of the church we're visiting to share his «concerns,» and suggesting that I'm just a weak mess of emotions and that's why I can't handle the life - sucking horror that has become sundays at this church.
Mitt doesn't
like to
talk about how he has helped others because he sees it as a privilege, not a political
talking point.
Which got me thinking... just
like the preacher pounds the pulpit during his weakest
points, maybe those who
talk loudest about grace are trying to compensate for a lifestyle that lacks grace.
All verses
like this and Matthew 5:28 (where Jesus
talks about adultery in a similarly harsh manner, are meant to do is
point us straight to verses of Paul's such as Romans 3:23 and Ephesians 2:8 - 9: it's the evidence Jesus provides that, no matter what, even if we never murder a single person or in any way commit adultery, we're nothing without Him... and, oh, yeah, it's the meter that shows us who we are and why we need Him, and only Him (John 14:6), to get to heaven.
But I» m for the
point that the term «silence» should not be used in the sense that God has been always on the business of
talk to people in defferent forms and also during that period a lot happened, we get the
likes of Zechariah the priest who always led worship ceremony.
Rather than attacking with your
talking points, fed to you by people adamantly opposed to evolution, why don't you sit down with a book by an expert who
LIKES evolution and read their perspective?
But when it comes down to more rudimentary
talk about «A linear configuration that looks
like that (
pointing)» we are in coordination.
The
point is to create a shared vocabulary and a shared understanding of policy and the political environment that will allow future candidates to
talk to this group without sounding
like space aliens.
But if it doesn't —
like when it
talks about the anger of God, or repentance, or gay sex, or divorce — then we can emphasise its humanness,
point out the limited knowledge of the writer, explain how they came to be so silly, and move beyond the text to a supposedly higher ethical standard.
To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you about this evil thing going around the earth... this evil minded people is there everywhere regardless of faith... that was not what i was trying to say... my
point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was
talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much
like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care...
like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter....
When people
like you «put your own house in order» concerning marriage (and specifically the divorce rate) instead of
pointing the finger of blame at people
like me, then we'll
talk.
Once we get to a
point in this country where people
like you can't march to the ballot box and restrict my CIVIL rights (while notably leaving your own intact, no matter how «unscriptural» those rights are), then we'll
talk.
Once we get to a
point in this country where people
like you aren't blasting people
like me with lies, misinformation, junk science, and scriptural hypocrisy, then we'll
talk.
Here are ten simple
points to remember as we move toward November, and then we can take questions and
talk about anything you
like.
Thus no generation has learned from another to love, no generation begins at any other
point than at the beginning, no generation has a shorter task assigned to it than had the preceding generation, and if here one is not willing
like the previous generations to stop with love but would go further, this is but idle and foolish
talk.
Once you begin to read [the Bible], if you're reading the prophets where they're
talking about exchanging the poor for a pair of sandals, and what happens when you have a widening gap between the ruling wealthy elites and the poor masses who can't feed their kids, and how this is an affront to what it means to be human, if at that
point you're
like, «Well, is this inerrant?»
One last
point — not sure I
like the image you have put in my head with
talk of exposing yourself David:).
It's
like talking to a bunch of brainwashed jackbooted democrat
talking point morons.
I think a counselor is good if you need someone to
talk to about the deeper stuff — of course good friends should be confided in — to a
point — but not so that the friendship becomes just about that — because then it feels
like a counseling relationship — and the friendship may be lost as you will associate that friend with your sin which you want to get rid of, and when you are free from the sin, you may want to be free from those associated with the sin too.
I'll feel
like I'm supposed to feel at this
point, when everything is going my way, when people are
talking about my book, when readers stand in line to get my name scrawled across a page, when I am a very.
Like that nonsense, your
talking points are totally asinine and self - contradictory.
As I said, you make your own
point far better — there are far too many closed minded idiots (
like you) that don't learn anything about what they're trying to
talk about, but instead see the world only through their own experiences — discounting all others.
No
point talking to people
like you; you're the kind I don't feel sorry for when they get taken advantage of with people
like Osteen.
(I'd
like to
talk more about hermeneutical aspect at some
point.)
But the
point I was trying to make is, I think making sweeping statements about «The Church» is
like talking about «the atheists» or «the homosexuals» — it's a damaging stereotype that ignores the diversity within.
He cited studies by the industry and a number of
talking points used by lobby groups, trying to discredit those with legitimate concerns,
like Cornucopia and its members.
I would
like to
talk with you at some
point, and no, I am not offended.