Sentences with phrase «talking points over»

In terms of typography and structure, a clean and classic look that promotes maximum readability of your resume information (which becomes even more important as you gain experience and talking points over time) is still well - received in all industries.

De Blasio's speech also transformed several of Fariña's central talking points over last year into official policy.

It's literally the same 7 to 12 people fighting each other with the same talking points over and over and over again.

Liberal Boomers, who seldom if ever seriously criticize the legions of conservative - demonizers in your midst, for this post I will mostly join Mr. Druckenmiller in accusing you outright, that is, I will act as if this was your premeditated plan motivated by selfish interest, and not a pattern of political self - delusion that you fell into, given the drip - drip - drip of Democrat talking points over the years, given your gleeful listening to those who dismissed conservatives as hateful dunces, so that you ceased to even consider the NUMBERS conservatives kept pointing to, and just kept on doggedly voting D.

It's the opposite of the Gish Gallop: instead of going from one talking point to another, you stick to the same talking point over and over again.

Not exact matches

Rice, working off the administration's unclassified talking points, characterized the attacks as a spontaneous demonstration over a video that disparaged Islam.

Look, everyone has called in sick for a pre-planned mental health or personal day at some point in their career, but that doesn't mean you should talk about it over work email.

You might think that talking up your good points was the fastest way to get over regret, but the results suggested otherwise.

The White House has insisted that it made only a «stylistic» change to the intelligence agency talking points from which Rice suggested on five Sunday talk shows that demonstrations over an anti-Islamic video devolved into the Benghazi attack.

But workers have filed lawsuits over the issue, and it's now become a heavily debated talking point among the presidential candidates.

Stewart said Trump was «just wrong» to call Putin and congratulate him on his reelection over the objections of his own national security aides, who wrote talking points for him with the words «DO NOT CONGRATULATE.»

In the same section, Zuckerberg has talking points that help him skirt any questions over whether he will or should resign (he's not planning to)

They don't need to talk over others to get their point across.

DuPont DuPont (NYSE: DD) is a great starting point when talking about companies that have adapted over time.

When we're talking compounded interest, every percentage point counts as over the course of 40 or 60 years, one to two percent can result in millions of dollars lost.

Be that as it may, the point of this talk is to argue against the proposition that a particular type of demand management policy was responsible for growth achieved over a couple of decades.

The Confessions do not in the first place talk about God; Marion makes a great point of saying that the second grammatical person prevails here over the third person.?

I completely disagree with you that it is ill mannered to ignore someone who has proven over and over again that their main purpose in talking to you is to point out that they disagree with all of your views, and that makes all your views wrong.

Just a little point here, why was it that he only talked to people over two thousand years ago?

Reconciliation at this point might mean being there for Emilia as she begins to talk about her fears over sharing her situation with Tom or her family — fears that may be well - founded.

Even the Brundtland Commission, which at first glance seems to be an exception with its blunt language about unsustainable population growth, ends in a familiar UN place: «Talking of population just as numbers glosses over an important point: People are also a creative resource, and this creativity is an asset societies must tap....

There are four affirmations about Jesus Christ that historically have been stressed in Christian faith: (1) Jesus is truly human, bone of our bone and flesh of our flesh, living a human life under the same human conditions any one of us faces — thus Christology, statement of the significance of Jesus, must start «from below,» as many contemporary theologians are insisting; (2) Jesus is that one in whom God energizes in a supreme degree, with a decisive intensity; in traditional language he has been styled «the Incarnate Word of God»; (3) for our sake, to secure human wholeness of life as it moves onward toward fulfillment, Jesus not only lived among us but also was crucified for us — this is the point of talk about atonement wrought in and by him; (4) death was not the end for him, so it is not as if he never existed at all; in some way he triumphed over death, or was given victory over it, so that now and forever he is a reality in the life of God and effective among humankind.

Your need to hijack the point of this post and talk over everyone on the thread is why the point continues to be relevant.

Without the cover and pampering by the press, last night's debate clearly showed your faux liberal god for what he truly is... a man clearly in over his head and incapable of distinguishing between talking points, policies, and facts.

I'm talking actual cold weather — to the point where I've even had ice frosting over my windshield at night — and SNOW in the mountains.

I assumed that he was talking about a common glass Growler, pointed out his typo, and told him not to send me anything because they'd leak all over the plane.

The biggest talking point from Chelsea's 1 - 0 Premier League victory over Everton on Wednesday night was not the result, but Branislav Ivanovic's apparent attack on James McCarthy.

Chelsea have reportedly hit a stumbling point in talks with youngster Kyle Scott over a new deal for the player at Stamford Bridge.

He sure had a better vantage point and got to talk to guys who played against him and watch a ton of film... Yeah... I'm takin his opinion on a safety's skills over yours all week long and twice on Sundays... then there's Monday nights... and Thursdays... and Thanksgivings...

With the Premier League over for another year, here's a list of 25 of the biggest talking points and lessons learned from the 2014/15 season, including analysis on Arsenal, Liverpool, Manchester United and more...

this is the sort of mentality you probably haven't read it properly and jumping all over just like after a bad result you do, of course winning something is very important and it is directly related to progress if your view is taken then no football club is progress the fact that they got relegated don't cancel out the fact that they won a trophy and winning something is always good don't tell that u weren't relieved when that trophy monkey got off our back so don't talk stupid talk with relevant points.

You have to choose, either smarten up and realize we can either be strategically productive or the same fans who always complain and knee jerk can have their talking points for over the pint and tue whole world can know our pioneering next moves.

Anyway though, talking about the Watford game, when we couldn't beat them when it actually mattered in the FA cup, feels like going over and over again on problems I've pointed out here so many times.

Tottenham boss Mauricio Pochettino was scathing in his attack on VAR after it was a major talking point in his side's win over Rochdale in the FA Cup.

Before the game had even kicked off at the John Smith's Stadium, the weekend's major talking point had already been established during Manchester City's emphatic victory over West Brom, as official Neil Swarbrick wrongly sent off the Baggies» centre - back Gareth McCauley, instead of teammate Craig Dawson.

I've heard pundits on others stations flat out say they are tired of talking about us because it's just the same nonsense every season and they've over the subject to the point it's boring.

everyone seems to be in a rush to do interviews especially after the Man u game... its a big big win for us seeing as we have not had one over them in 4 years but in the name of all that is good this is AFC we are talking about and no matter how crucial a win is against one of our biggest rival we should just move on and focus on the next game and stop behaving and acting like a newly promoted side that caused a big upset by beating one of the favorites for the title... at the end of the day its a very important win but its still 3 points....

After Liverpool's impressive 5 - 1 win over Brighton on Saturday, Jurgen Klopp's unpleasant - looking exchange with opposite number Chris Hughton was a talking point.

It was no surprise to hear Arsene Wenger talking this week about the pressure of being at the top of the Premier League, as his Arsenal side have suffered with it plenty of times, including over the last few weeks when the Gunners hit a slump after finding ourselves two points clear and in pole position to win the Premier League.

Talk about missing the point — that must have sailed way over your head.

While Zanzi talks, I can see Francesco Totti over his shoulder, tapping balls to teammates and, at one point, leaving the ground to catch a volley with his shoelaces, sending the ball careening past the practice goalie.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

In talking to Blalock over the years, he has that same passion for the game that Stevenson had — and which Anderson still has (he's now helping coach teams at Capital Christian - Sacramento)-- but it's likely he'll retire at some point.

I keep trying to talk myself into outlandish scenarios where Southampton somehow escapes relegation (five points from safety with five matches to play) and it's like trying to figure out how Hunter Pence is going to end up with a 2018 OPS over.800.

But when it looked all over at half time Wenger must have given a brilliant half time talk and somehow persuaded his team to start fighting for the points.

Secondly for allthe talk of us being so much better than Chelsea over the second half of the season Chelsea totalled 41 points ou of their last 18 games, Arsenal totalled 42 points.

Houston's Rob Gray scored a career high 39 points in the win over No. 11 San Diego State, but we all just wanted to talk about his man bun.

Speaking after the 3 - 0 win over Atalanta on Sunday which extended Juve's lead at the top of Serie A to seven points, Conte said: «Transfer talk seems disrespectful to the players in my team, especially at the current moment.

These 5 points you talk about were due to the fact that Manure had to play over weekend.

They were talking about the melee on the ice, which escalated to the point where players came over the boards of both benches, and punches flew between the opposing coaches.