Sentences with phrase «talks about some of the characters»

She talks about some of the characters and classes in the game as well as a general overview on how to play Gigantic.

Not exact matches

So to hear Rae talk about standing up to a room full of network execs, her new bosses, and fight for two insecure black characters who have messy lives and are fully realized as complex characters?
They'll still be talking about how gorgeous it is, how smart and funny its main character is, how it succeeded commercially in the shadow of a new Nintendo console and a new «Legend of Zelda» game.
He said that he was talking about the idea of killing off the character since the fourth or fifth episode of season eight but that it was something the showrunner Scott Gimple could have had in mind for a while.
After The Hundreds paid homage to the Lost Boys characters from Peter Pan in a few designs, Disney approached Kim, 28, to talk about a line of Lost Boys streetwear.
Though it's kind of fun to feel like I'm a character in a William Gibson novel when we talk about stuff like that.
A lot of people talk about persona development, but tend to mean fictional characters that portray an ideal customer.
Twitter has gone to 280 character tweets, but you would need more than that to capture the nuance of which surplus you're talking about.
I quite often treat this blog like a diary, so sometimes I'll stray away from talking about my personal finance and share my current thoughts, I'll be excited to go back and read some old post when the years go by, and it will help me reflect on the overall journey that has been experienced, because as great as the end goal of early retirement is, I would imagine the character developed through such a process has more then just monetary value.
It would be more interesting to talk about the president losing control of his own spins in ways that reveal (as Carl is more insistent that I am) his deep inauthenticity or lack of character.
If you're talking about the fictional character, most of what we currently know as Santa Claus developed from Dutch, German and Scandinavian folklore.
I am in talks about a Defamation of Character lawsuit and would use testimony here from Individuaks that heard through the Emergent circles that about me.
Talk about the black need for character is fine, but acting on the moral obligation that whites owe to blacks is part of his character.
If he talks about the event character (1 / 10th of a second in length and all that) of the self, it is because he thinks that is what analysis of self - consciousness itself discloses and not because he means to construct the self out of subhuman individuals or organisms (Shalom's «event - cells»).
If you knew how many of the «debaters» in this forum were paid shills sitting in boiler room type operations all day basically getting into character and arguing the agenda their boss gave them you would spend less time debating them and more time talking about their little known but thriving industry.
anyone who is in the lobby industry or marketing research knows about this business but the majority of the average forum readers have no clue that the person they are talking with is in character and secretly copying their info and telling some lobby if they agree or disagree with their agenda.
OK then in what you say about dogmatic absolutism being the opposit of faith you are talking about the righd structures, the incomplicated faith, the mask of reilgion the mask of science and the trading of cliches and insults like cartoon characters — showbusiness.
As silly as this article is, my 4th grader's public school recently pulled «Superfudge», a book by Judy Bloom, out of the curriculum because the characters talk about the fact that Santa isn't real.
I noted earlier that it is rather generally conceded today that traditional Christian talk about creation and the last things has the character of myth.
«What young people really need is not more talk about the mechanics of sex and contraception, but encouragement to develop the character qualities of stability, faithfulness and commitment - the qualities they will need to build a strong and lasting marriage based on something that runs deeper than feelings and physical attraction.»
talks so confidently about the inerrant, perfect, infallible character of the original Autographs of the Bible when no one has seen one for more than eighteen centuries Moreover, it is clear that originally no one thought the wording was perfect since copyists, translators, and authors had little fear of changing it.
I told him that when I had looked it up in the New Testament, in all other passages where «fruit» was mentioned in terms of «bearing» it, it seemed to be talking character traits — about the fruits of the Holy Spirit from Galatians 5:22 - 23, like love, joy, peace, patience, etc..
Christians in particular have a way of letting careless language about God creep into our idiomatic subculture to the point that we talk about Him (and thus insinuate things about His character) without even realizing it.
I am convinced that a good deal of talk about prayer is vitiated by the assumption that God is an intolerant, indeed we might say an intolerable, tyrant who must be cajoled rather than addressed; and this is tied in with a picture of his nature or character that is fundamentally unchristian or subchristian, even if many Christian thinkers have fallen victim to it.
And yes your faith is just as assailible as any other facet of character you want to involve in ruling the nation, if you do nt want to talk about it then stop bringing it up.
So... I leave you to your own demise... just think about it... Millions of make believe characters talked about by millions more, and you hang on to what...?
Whereas for ordinary theologians this character does not weaken the truth claims we make but deepens and enriches them, most scientist - theologians are skeptical of talk about myth and metaphor.
In what might be a radical departure from its normal practice of self - description, the congregation can talk about the particularity and worth of its own character.
Believe — We can talk about lots of fictional characters, both recent and ancient.
Because watching a character wandering around talking to himself isn't exactly a recipe for MacGruber - style hilarity, audiences may be in for some surprises; especially considering the show was originally pitched with the concept of being about two surviving members of humanity.
When Jesus told his disciples to go baptizing in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, he was talking about character, of holiness and trueness.
I propose that we take a good look at the character of the actual witness we are communicating and consider whether Jesus might not have known what he was talking about when he suggested that we give to Caesar what belongs to Caesar.
It is abhorrent to my soul to talk inhumanly about greatness, to let it loom darkly at a distance in an indefinite form, to make out that it is great without making the human character of it evident — wherewith it ceases to be great.
We must talk about practical, tangible moral dilemmas, realities and virtues, and we must focus on developing character in the midst of religious belief.
One of the best known video reviewers on the web, Brad Bishop, talks about eating chile peppers and hot sauce on his YouTube channel, as well as the motivation behind doing his various characters.
but, im ok with this vardy transfer... it shows us many things: 1) wenger is changing, something some of us have been demanding for a long time; 2) it shows that wenger is taking risks: think about it, he is buying a men for a not cheap price, knowing he could not getting anything after, with a future sell i mean... this is an act that shows wengers intentions to win something, the buy is not motivated by any financial or economic reason but only for a «get the f epl once again» reason... this is an act that shows us hungry, even if we fail, we could said we try... first ever, we really try; 3) finally but very important... vardy is the kind of player we need... he is a warrior, a fighter... he has character... look at how he celebrate his goals... full of energy... he, like alexis, can motivate the team when the things are not going in our way (something wenger cant do because of his age and because he has never been an active coach on the pitch)... the vardy transfer, if it finish well, is a demostration of a change, and a good one... lets take care of winning things and do nt look the economic side for once... vardy is a bit old, but we can give a chance to welbeck after maybe, or akpom... u are not thinking about the future when we talk about ibra... guys: u complain when wenger do nt spend or because he is always looking for the bargain when u are the guys who has to pay the very expensive tickets... u complain when wenger buy the always for the future guy... like morata... stop to complain for everything and be consequent with yourself... i would love auba, but it is not going to happen... lukaku is awesome but the asking price is stupid... lets try with vardy, give us the throphy..
like the instinct of our mind and body and i actually like this comment of wilshere he said that read and accepted the criticism that he should pass more and faster so he did think about corrections in his play but told us the truth about the matter that he almos instinctively wants to run at the defenders thats his football and his «character» of play, i like his honest answer and i think that fans shouldn't talk about private things of players if they wants to spend time in twitter, i think we should respect that and not criticise it cause maybe it helps him relax, thats my opinion on the matter ^ ^
Over a chef salad at the small café just across the casino floor, Jimmy talks about a Vegas long passed, casinos that are barely a memory and the characters that built this town who are now on the cusp of being forgotten.
I guess now that I think about it, some of the side character dialogue is, but you don't have to talk to them much.
Im not even talking about «oh he should be heel» but have him do something that fucking sticks and is the launching point of a definitive character for him besides «guy will one day overcome the odds».
This is Arya Damn Stark we're talking about: survivor extraordinaire, vengeance incarnate and central «Game of Thrones» character since the beginning.
If Mr wenger built a team who never lost it tells me he can build a team remember a team consists of 11 different characters with different back grounds beliefs and aspirations and problems with another 11 to back them up I remember years ago the press used to talk about arsenal and not having English players on the field never the less I know off our own fatalities as such we were somehow always coming up little short by injuries to such Edwardo vanpercie and even gas diaby ramsy rosiscky carzola and many more and others that did nt seem to gel well I am not blind and I know we are not doing well but to suggest that Mr wenger docent have a clue is totally preposterous and disrespectful
A few days ago I posted a comment on here and noted how AFC always seem to lose ground and our way once the heat is on... how we lack the mental strength and character to deal with pressure of maintaining a lead once we are top of the table and how we ALWAYS crumble when it matter most... i also noted how we ALWAYS seem to regain our mojo soon as we are out of contention for every important competition, when we go on some amazing winning streak, just in time to snatch the 4th place trophy... as is the norm on here and many other AFC fans forum i got member jumped down my throat, talking about negative fans, talking about new players we have and how that problem was a thing of the past....
We can talk about his character though, and does this character usually sit well with the top bosses of football.
Author Paul Tough talks with Hathaway Brown Head of School Bill Crist about why schools and teachers should focus on resilience and other non-cognitive character traits, August 2012.
She was one of the best teachers of character I met — yet not only did she not talk much about character, she wasn't even a teacher.
But here's the magic of movies — and of the Family Movie Journal: You get to talk about all those hopes and dreams and fears as they happen to characters in the stories you're watching.
And one of the things that she's talking about is an episode, now this happened in the late «70s but it was an episode and she was actually on the show talking to I think, I don't think it was an actual character on the show, I think it was like one of the little kids on the show about breastfeeding.
In reading Paul Tough «s new book, How Children Succeed: Grit, Curiosity, and the Hidden Power of Character, it struck me that many of the characteristics Tough talks about in raising a successful child are also hallmarks of successful entrepreneurs.
Talk to them about the fun characters and designs that are on the front and back of Pull - Ups Training Pants.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z