Sentences with phrase «tamino noted»

As tamino noted when analysing all the main surface temperature and TLT data sets (emphasis added):

As Tamino notes, Milankovic cycles do lead to a slight modulation of the annual average, but it is very small, especially for the 100KYr cycle.

As Tamino notes,

Not exact matches

Note it is referred to as a review but it is really a critique of Tamino's criticisms of the book.

Note that in the last piece, Tamino points out the coincidence of two very large volcanic eruptions early in the «dalton minimum,» which as many have noted, may account for the oddities of the weather more than the solar magnetic activity.

I note that, in contemporary comments at Tamino (where you posted at the time), you did not state that you believed that NASA software was incapable of «fixing» such inhomogeneities.

I should also note that while in comments at TAV, Doug decreed Judy and Tamino's criticisms of his points invalid.

See Tamino's 2nd figure Global Anthropogenic Sulfur Emissions; note the leveling off of emissions after 1975.

To answer Don Don's accusation («where were you»), let it be noted that I actually asked Tamino to support his claim that

silence, I note that supporters of the Team over at Tamino appear to think they have dismissed Steve's demolition of W&A.

* [Editor's note: the phrase «more or less» was dropped in the editing process and did not appear in the original post, but was properly re-inserted on 01/25/12 after comments by Tamino]

I note that in 1995 Tamino's graph indicates the sea level rise was approximately the same as the peak in 1950.

Note that Tamino's curve does not follow every «ubiquitous wiggle».

Tamino, note that your post appears here, quite unlike your own site where you censor almost all opposing opinions and ban those who posted them.

Tamino added a simulated reconstruction with some spikes and noted that the Marcott method would show the spikes, but they would be attenuated some what.

On this note, Tamino is also a frequent user of reduced dimensional models.

[DB] «As far as the CET / Tamino projections the thread has vanished (sadly missed) but I kept a note of the comments»

Note that Curry has agreed that tamino's analysis (replicated in this post) is correct and useful, but

Two examples leap to mind, alongside this stuff: WUWT posting the Daily Mail «u-turn by Prof Jones» story (though he was careful not to actually endorse that story, I note) and this bit of genius that Tamino took apart, where Watts had a guest who, unknowingly it seems, because they were so incompetent, took GISS data and turned it upside down.

Also notes that Tamino has blocked him!

I'm actually curious why [edit: Tamino] didn't note it... or mention approvingly McC's posts from last February.

Note that Tamino posted the only two test results which agree with his hypothesis, while ignoring the vast majority of indicators pointing to the presence of a unit root:

This analysis has been done by many people, ranging from Tamino to Zeke Hausfather, and even Roy Spencer noted on Watts» blog -LRB-!!!!!) that he found no evidence that the station «removal» had any effect.