However, I am not averse to traditional value plays based on discount to
tangible book when the opportunity arises.
Not exact matches
«It's amazing how
books are constantly being flagged as obsolete in the post iPad / Kindle world, but in reality people have real emotion and attachment to
tangible physical
books,» McLeod told me, describing those emotions as «both the memories of where [the owners] were
when they experienced them, as well as the knowledge contained within.»
I read
when I want, set my own work hours, and feel very little compulsion to produce anything but
tangible results, which are usually the outcome of having harvested good ideas from
books.
I've been diving into a classic
book entitled «Think and Grow Rich» by Napoleon Hill, who takes this even further
when he says: «Money is the transmutation of desire into it's
tangible equivalent.»
When I was younger I loved
books that came with their own little hidden treasures, pull out letters or drawings from characters, something
tangible from the world of the
book.
This means, that
when a new
book is released, in digital and
tangible form, it would not be made available to libraries for a solid six months.
There's something
tangible there, and
when I'm recommending a
book to friends or my niece, if I can see one on my shelf, it's easier to remember than looking through my kindle.
One of the big reasons why kids read print is because
when it comes to story - time, parents prefer reading a
tangible book.
When paying service fees up front, you should see
tangible value provided in the form of e-
book production,
book design, editorial help, ongoing administration and title management, and so on.
In the past
when you had an ebook and were on page 16, it would be different then the page 16 of a
tangible book.
When readers go through what the characters in the
book go through, it gives off a more
tangible experience.
Although it has remained a classical deadlocked situation to debate which reading medium is better, it seems irrational to convince readers to wait for their
tangible book while the download button is just one click away — especially
when they are expecting new releases from new faces of their favorite authors.
But in an era
when anyone can create a blog or post musings on Facebook or MySpace, people still seem to want the
tangible validation of a printed
book.
I can definitely relate to the «
tangible product at the back of the room
when they talk» (not to mention my bookshelves, as a lifelong
book - lover).
There's nothing like a
tangible thing
when you go and speak to people, and so very much of what I do is getting in front of people, so if I didn't have a
book in my hands — to tell them to go and download it isn't the same.
All measures like the growth in
tangible book value per share become considerably more complicated to evaluate
when a company grows via a series of mergers.
Alright, I took a look at my
books and I was mistaken, they actually make an argument that
tangible book value is not always an accurate measure, especially in the case
when the intangibles can be sold off in the case of a patent, rights, or copyright.
This analysis does not even take into account the value of Aviat's long - term assets of $ 61 million, or $ 1.02 per share, which,
when added to net current assets of $ 3.35 per share, equates to
tangible book value of $ 4.37 per share.
Unfortunately, we were restricted from buying back more stock
when it was cheap — below
tangible book value — and we did not get permission to buy back stock until it was selling at $ 45 a share.
Tangible book value is what shareholders of the company can expect to receive if the company were to go bankrupt and takes out items such as goodwill that no one buys
when assets are liquidated.