Sentences with phrase «tangible medium»

On the other hand, although the phrase «literary work» may not seem totally apposite The Bluebook is surely an «original work of authorship... fixed in [a] tangible medium of expression.»

For millennia, humans have relied upon tangible mediums of exchange.

Caroline's exhibitions focus on the theme of kinetic memory and somatics in relation to dance, performance, and other more tangible mediums of art.

His devices empower and translate closed systems into tangible medium; a flooding river is given a voice, a goldfish is at the mercy of a cocktail party, colours...

Here are some of the most common: Copyright / Trademark: According to the United States Copyright Office, copyright is «a form of protection grounded in the US Constitution and granted by law for original works of authorship fixed in a tangible medium of expression.»

The author is the person who conceives the work and fixes its expression in a tangible medium.

«Copyright protection subsists in original work of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression now known or later developed from which they can be perceived, reproduced or otherwise communicated, either directly or with the aid of a machine or device.

Content must be fixed in a tangible medium, so screenplays, music recordings, films, lesson plans, and videos can be copyrighted, but the ideas behind them can not.

Authors create copyrights as soon as they set words (or images) with minimal creative expression into or onto a tangible medium.

According to the U.S. government, «Copyright is a form of protection grounded in the U.S. Constitution and granted by law for original works of authorship fixed in a tangible medium of expression.»

A copyright is creative work that has been affixed in a tangible medium.

Both documents were created on the assumption that «writing» meant «on paper» (or some other tangible medium), and an electronic communication was not in writing.

In the United States, you own the copyright on a work the moment you fix it in a tangible medium; whether you use pencil, paint, paper, cloth, stone, film, or digital recordings, your work is protected.

17 USC 102 (a) states the basic rule regarding what is protected: original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, now known or later developed, from which they can be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated, either directly or with the aid of a machine or device

In the USA, a document is subject to copyright when it is «fixed in a tangible medium».

However, I recently talked to a laywer about the case of a physical document which is later published, and said laywer (though not providing legal advice) said the copyright date would be the time at which that physical document was created, rather than published (since at the time of creation, it is already fixed in a tangible medium, even if it hasn't yet been published).

What counts as «fixing in a tangible medium» for a digital document?

Under the Berne Convention (and the national laws which implement it), you get a copyright when something is «fixed in a tangible medium» such as paper or film, and then it belongs to the person who created the work (or their employer, with additional caveats not relevant here).

Copyright attaches when the work is set forth in a «tangible medium», which is «when its embodiment in a copy or phonorecord, by or under the authority of the author, is sufficiently permanent or stable to permit it to be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated for a period of more than transitory duration.»

Copyright protection subsists -LSB-...] in original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, now known or later developed, from which they can be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated, either directly or with the aid of a machine or device.

Copyrights attach to fixed representations of creative work in a tangible medium (e.g., the actual code and graphical elements of the software in question).

Copyright protection subsists, in accordance with this title, in original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression... (17 USC 102)

It's fairly well settled in the U.S. that when a public performance is simultaneously broadcast, that broadcast constitutes fixation in a tangible medium of expression under 17 U.S.C....

Based solely on the excerpt above, yes, you have the copyright on the audio files if you created the source material, as you are the creator, using Amazon Polly as / to generate a «tangible medium».

With respect to the user information, Bucholz points out that copyright only applies to «original expressions fixed in a tangible medium.»

Leaving aside the document Tyson signed, one issue under US law would be whether human skin may qualify as «any tangible medium of expression,» as required by Title 17 of the Code.

«The ultimate separability question, then, is whether the feature for which copyright protection is claimed would have been eligible for copyright protection as a pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work had it originally been fixed in some tangible medium other than a useful article before being applied to a useful article.»

Copyright also does not protect works that aren't fixed in a tangible medium, which means ideas are not protectable.