Sentences with phrase «tar sands development»

Pipeline politics has been on the uptick, reflecting growing opposition to tar sands development across Canada.

Given the massive investments in pots and pans that tar sands development requires, I'm amazed that anyone would invest that much in a country that's about as stable as a table with two legs.

One way tar sand supporters will continue to push for more tar sands development is to continue their efforts to try to re-brand the tar sands from dirty oil to «ethical oil».

In a news analysis published today, the New York Times concludes that while the tax bill provision on Keystone XL will likely kill the project, the victory will do little to stop future pipelines, stall tar sands development, or slow down global warming.

Another study detailing the negative environmental effects of continued tar sands development in Canada, and how independent review finds much greater impact that either the industry or government cares to

The pollution, deforestation, and disturbance to wildlife associated with tar sands development threaten the additional livelihood and wellbeing of indigenous communities.

For the past decade, Droitsch has worked on issues related to tar sands development, first in Canada, then at NRDC, where she helped to lead the campaign to defeat the proposed Keystone XL pipeline.

It is a particular challenge for Canadians who are opposed to tar sands development.

Such a rapid expansion of tar sands development is part of a global energy scenario that would push average global temperatures as high as six degrees Celsius by the end of the century.

In situ extraction, which accounts for the vast majority of tar sands development, is performed by drilling numerous wells into the tar sands deposit.

I also ask the students to address CAPPâ $ ™ s argument that tar sands development doesnâ $ ™ t matter.

This rapid increase in GHGs is because there is not one single federal regulation to limit the amount of GHGs from tar sands development, permitting tar sands companies to continue to expand production — and greenhouse gas emissions — in perpetuity.

Although governments and the oil industry claim that all of the land disturbed by tar sands development will be reclaimed, little reclamation has already taken place.

This would have a real effect on tar sands development as an MIT study points out that they are vulnerable to climate / energy policies aimed at reducing emissions.

Native American tribes in the Pacific Northwest are invoking an unusual source of legal authority — treaties — to block massive coal, crude oil and tar sands development.

The report puts tar sands development lost revenue at $ 30.9 billion from 2010 through 2013, in part due to the changing North American oil market but largely because of a fierce grassroots movement against tar sands development.

After gutting most of Canada's federal environmental legislation to expedite tar sands development and pipeline proposals at the behest of the oil industry, now the federal government is making it more difficult, and in some cases impossible, for members of the public to participate in the National Energy Board's (NEB) review of Enbridge's proposal to reverse its Line 9 pipeline through southern Ontario and Quebec.

Additional escalation of the mining impact occurs as conventional oil mining is supplanted by tar sands development, with mining and land disturbance from the latter producing land use - related greenhouse gas emissions as much as 23 times greater than conventional oil production per unit area [152], but with substantial variability and uncertainty [152]--[153].

Lake sediment cores document increased chemical pollution of ecosystems during the past several decades traceable to tar sands development [157] and snow and water samples indicate that recent levels of numerous pollutants exceeded local and national criteria for protection of aquatic organisms [158].

Useful quantitative measures of the increasing ecological impacts are provided by the history of oil development in Alberta, Canada for production of both conventional oil and tar sands development.

It ignores the pipeline's significant risk for toxic spills, ignores its catastrophic impacts on our climate, and ignores the clear consensus among financial analysts and oil executives who agree Keystone XL will make the difference in tar sands development.»

I know when you looked out at the hundreds of miles of wasteland that is the tar sands development you knew it was wrong.

The unstated assumption of the SEIS on the implication of tar sands development is that the nations of the world will not implement policies needed to avoid potentially disastrous climate change.

The considerable pressure exerted on behalf of the pipeline by industry interests and the Canadian government clearly indicate its importance for full - scale tar sands development.

We analyzed how much carbon tar sands oil produces and assessed the climate impact of the Keystone XL pipeline, concluding that building it would unleash a massive expansion of tar sands development and cause a dramatic increase in carbon pollution.

Indigenous people who are opposed to unchecked tar sands development and many report illnesses caused by toxic pollution from the largest industrial development on the planet.

According to Shorting the Climate, a report documenting big bank support for fossil fuel infrastructure, the top global and U.S. banks provided $ 785 billion for fossil fuel infrastructure such as coal and tar sands development from 2013 through 2015.

Tar Sands and Unconventional Fossil Fuels In a previous post «Silence Is Deadly» I wrote, «The environmental impacts of tar sands development include: irreversible effects on biodiversity and the natural environment, reduced water quality, destruction of fragile pristine Boreal forest and associated wetlands, aquatic and watershed mismanagement, habitat fragmentation, habitat loss, disruption to life cycles of endemic wildlife particularly bird and caribou migration, fish deformities and negative impacts on the human health in downstream communities.»

Be honest about the thousands of treaty rights violations the government is being sued for because of the impacts of tar sands development.

Big Oil has made tar sands development a global enterprise and will do whatever it takes to get mining equipment in, and the oil out, to foreign markets.

And that will require Canadians to play a larger role in deciding whether a massive expansion of tar sands development is prudent.

Without some $ 100 - million that U.S. foundations have spent swaying us to their point of view, tar sands development and the shipment of tar sands oil would be far less contentious a public issue.

Despite claims of responsible and sustainable tar sands development, the Alberta government continues to sell new petroleum and natural gas leases in five threatened caribou range areas — including the tar sands region — despite unacceptably high industrial disturbance of caribou habitat in those areas.

When this pristine forest is strip - mined for tar sands development, much of its stored carbon is lost.

If the Climate Action Partnership members are not sincere about personally making major reductions emissions now --- stopping tar sands development, coal plant developments, etc --- then it is they that are hoaxing us.

As my colleague Trey Pollard said in a Business Week article, «The review will be a meaningless document unless it includes a serious review of the very serious climate impacts of the tar sands development the pipeline will trigger.»

Without this pipeline, Canada's tar sands development will take place much more slowly, and at a much smaller scale.

Expertise needed: (1) engineers with knowledge about pipeline risk and reliability, (2) scientists with knowledge of climate change that could be caused by tar sands development.»

History is being made right now in Ottawa, Canada as hundreds of people from across North America are risking arrest on Parliament Hill during a mass civil disobedience sit - in to protest tar sands development.

Lake sediment cores document increased chemical pollution of ecosystems during the past several decades traceable to tar sands development [157] and snow and water samples indicate that recent levels of numerous pollutants exceeded local and national criteria for protection of aquatic organisms [158].

From carcinogens to acid rain, tar sands development is raising levels of industrial pollution across the north

The Natural Resources Defense Council is tracking a series of industry announcements that are «pouring cold water on the argument that tar sands development...

Aerosols from the production of heavy oil is a growing climate and pollution concern because new tar sands developments are on the drawing board in Venezuela, Utah and elsewhere, the study says.

The pipeline itself is meaningless, what matters, from a climate perspective, are all the additional GHG emissions that would be caused, directly and indirectly, by tar sand development.

BP is relying heavily on CCS claims as justification for tar sand developments in Canada, too — along with the U.S. State Department, which is blocking the EPA from having any say in tar sand imports to the United States.

Not exact matches

HSBC, the biggest bank in Europe and the world's seventh - largest, has resolved to stop funding Arctic drilling, tar sands / oil sands development, and most new...

The SPP is an arrangement between Canada, the US, and Mexico that seeks to accelerate tar - sands development, among -LSB-...]

In addition, unfettered tar sands plant construction drives up the price of building materials making other development prohibitively expensive.

Unwilling to press for a rational, staged development, Harper has ensured that tar sands expansion will continue to keep the value of the Canadian dollar high and make our manufactured goods uncompetitive.

They point to an article that you wrote in March, I think, of 2012 in Policy Options, where you basically said, dirty oil, the tar sands it's called, dirty oil and the future of our country, where you argue that the development of the, as you use the word, tar sands, it's become a political term, by the way, as you know, is basically not necessarily good for the country, in fact it takes jobs away in the manufacturing sector of Ontario.