Fracked gas pipelines are also a key component of
the tar sands infrastructure: up to 60 per cent of fracked gas extracted in Canada is actually used to fuel other parts of the oil and gas industry, including the tar sands.
The Sierra Club and its allies are not alone in calling for a broader look at expanded
tar sands infrastructure.
Not exact matches
It is time to not only ban fracking, but halt new investments in fossil fuels and related
infrastructure, including pipelines, gas - fired power plants, fracking waste dumps, fossil fuel storage depots in the salt caverns by Seneca Lake, LNG exports at Port Ambrose, crude oil «bomb trains,» and a
tar sands oil heater at the Port of Albany.
U.S. permits for multiple proposed Canadian
tar sands pipelines should be considered in light of an overall climate change strategy, rather than the current practice of considering each energy
infrastructure proposal on a project - by - project basis.
Instead, world leaders have pandered and caved to the powerful fossil fuel lobby: rubber stamping massive carbon - intensive
infrastructure, unlocking billions of tonnes of new carbon in hard - to - reach places like the deep offshore ocean, the arctic, or hard - to - extract resources like
tar sands, and proceeded to design energy policy around scenarios incompatible with a safe global climate.
Alternatively, it could mean that being near peak oil there will be inertia in the system due to investments made in the
infrastructure for coal - based energy,
tar sands, shale, or what have you.
According to Shorting the Climate, a report documenting big bank support for fossil fuel
infrastructure, the top global and U.S. banks provided $ 785 billion for fossil fuel
infrastructure such as coal and
tar sands development from 2013 through 2015.
The «North American Energy
Infrastructure Act,» HR 3301, which would allow Congress to approve the Keystone XL
tar sands pipeline and any other pipeline that crosses the U.S. border.
Sure, these
tar sands assets were stranded because of low oil prices, and the
infrastructure built to extract
tar sands could be turned back on anytime, but that seems very unlikely.
The gut - check issue for McKibben and his supporters — thousands of whom turned out for a mass demonstration in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 17 — is the Keystone XL pipeline, a 3,400 - mile pipe proposed by oil
infrastructure company TransCanada that will allow crude oil extracted from the
tar sands of Alberta, in southern Canada, to be refined on the Gulf of Mexico.
Or we can reject them by eliminating
tar sands from our energy
infrastructure.
Cynically, the report pegs the «harmlessness» to the idea that since
tar sands will be exploited anyway, transport need not take into account building
infrastructure to ensure that it will indeed be exploited to the last drop.