As The New York Times reported on Saturday, that is what motivated the consulting firm Cambridge Analytica to collect data from more than 50 million Facebook users, without their consent, to build its own behavioral models to
target potential voters in various political campaigns.
As The New York Times reported on Saturday, that is what motivated the consulting firm Cambridge Analytica to collect data from more than 50 million Facebook users, without their consent, to build its own behavioral models to
target potential voters in various political campaigns.
Not exact matches
As part of an aggressive new
voter -
targeting operation, Cambridge Analytica — financially supported by reclusive hedge fund magnate and leading Republican donor Robert Mercer — is now using so - called «psychographic profiles» of US citizens in order to help win Cruz votes, despite earlier concerns and red flags from
potential survey - takers.
Those systemic problems have dramatically worsened since the presidential election, with Facebook coming under intense fire on multiple fronts: Russian operatives using Facebook to manipulate
voter sentiment during the presidential election, Facebook accounts spreading «fake» news, the
potential for its advertising system to be used for racist
targeting and its slow response to violent or harmful content on the platform.
What's impressive is how fast the this technology has has spread: my first detailed exposure to
voter - file
targeting was at last November's CampaignTech conference, where the company CampaignGrid was touting its ability to deliver ads specifically to
potential voters in a district.
Instead, they could
target voters and
potential donors more effectively using the information they gathered by actually running Facebook ads and measuring the results.
In Sen. Barack Obama's Iowa headquarters, young staff members sit at computers, analyzing online
voter data and
targeting potential backers.
And since Cambridge Analytica was working for Donald Trump, had worked on Brexit, and was making practical use of this psychological research and not only
targeted potential Trump
voters but also tried to depress
potential Clinton
voters from casting their vote, the public outrage was high.
Wynne speaks in excited tones about field metrics dashboards, Web - based predictive dialer applications that make calling
potential supporters easier, and «text - based Twitter
targeting,» a program that scans
voters» Twitter feeds for indications of how they might vote.
As part of an aggressive new
voter -
targeting operation, Cambridge Analytica — financially supported by reclusive hedge fund magnate and leading Republican donor Robert Mercer — is now using so - called «psychographic profiles» of US citizens in order to help win Cruz votes, despite earlier concerns and red flags from
potential survey - takers.
Another example: the recent race for an at - large city council seat in the District of Columbia, which saw a candidate using geo -
targeted Google content ads to send
potential voters to his NationBuilder site.
He set up a «direct mail» operation, Rove + Company [sic], pinpointing
potential Republican
voters and sending them fundraising or
voter registration letters written specifically to appeal to the
target audience.
The New York League of Conservation
Voters is out with a new radio ad slamming its No. 1 Democratic primary
target that features a catchy Calypso tune with definite earworm
potential and the refrain: «Anyone is better than Bill Stachowski.»
The figures suggest the
potential for meltdown in the electoral system if the Liberal Democrats can persuade
voters in their
target seats that they have a «realistic chance» of winning.
Data - driven
targeting of
potential voters played an enormous role in the election of Barack Obama; directed marketing has led to record growth for companies like 1 -800-Flowers.
This timeline is Quartz's attempt to offer a comprehensive, yet clear, explanation of how Cambridge Analytica came to use the data of 50 million Facebook users, collected without their permission, to
target potential Trump
voters during the 2016 US presidential election.
That reportedly included «suck [ing] out the entire social graph» — an individual's network of friends on Facebook — in a bid to
target more and more
potential voters through friends» friends on social media.
Indeed, the Obama campaign was heralded for its data savviness in connecting with
potential voters and also used Facebook profile information to
target ads (though, to be clear, the Obama campaign didn't violate Facebook's terms, as Cambridge Analytica did).
It was used as a tactic to
target potential Clinton
voters as well as Trump supporters.
Obama
targeted voters and
potential supporters using software that ran outside of Facebook.
While advertisers generally
target consumers as groups, political campaigns need to
target specific people - registered
voters receptive to a
potential message.
In a November 2016 op - ed in The New York Times, he writes that President Donald Trump's digital team used hyper -
targeted posts to serve different ads to different
potential voters, «aiming to push the exact right buttons» at the right time.
The more DIY - minded might craft a message for specific
potential voters in their races, and then use Facebook's powerful
targeting features to find those
voters, searching by geography, interests, age, gender and political leanings.
He said that AIQ worked on the software used to analyse that data and
target ads at
potential voters in order to influence their views and votes.