For example, if the student's reading rate is at goal, but his or her reading accuracy is below 95 %, then the first intervention should
target reading accuracy.
According to reading research, a percentage below 95 % suggests that the student might benefit from receiving interventions that
target reading accuracy (rather than fluency).
Not exact matches
Annual goals ideally should follow Paul J. Meyer's recommendations for creating SMART goals, meaning that they should
target a specific area (e.g.,
accuracy in
reading, time spent staying in one's seat) and be measurable, achievable, relevant to the student, and time - bound.
If you're attempting to review notes in a landscape mode or while
reading a regular book and you find the tiny tap
target too small to hit with any
accuracy, you can instead tap once on the highlighted text the note is linked to, and then on the easier - to - reach Notes icon that appears.
Given that physics experiments often have residuals whose standard deviations easily reach 0.001 % of that of the data or better (considerably better in the case of quantum electrodynamics, not much better in the case of the gravitational constant G), 1 %
accuracy in fitting is a commendable
target but hardly an outrageous one given that the data originates from many millions of
readings.