The companies collectively ran data operations for President Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign, helping
him target voters on Facebook against his then - rival Clinton.
Over the weekend, The New York Times reported that Cambridge Analytica, a British consulting firm, improperly acquired the private data of about roughly 50 million Facebook users, and used it to
target voters on behalf of the Trump campaign during the 2016 presidential election.
Cambridge Analytica is under investigation in both the US and the UK for the way it obtained as many as 87 million users» data from Facebook and for whether it used that data to
target voters on behalf of the Trump campaign in the US and the Brexit referendum in the UK.
This money was to
target voters on social media during the Brexit referendum campaign.
Everyone's been in Kentucky Boneless Chicken mode since I soft - polled a bunch of
target voters on recognition issues and just over 70 % of them thought Ed Balls was EWAN MCGREGOR»S DAD.
Cambridge Analytica is under investigation in both the U.S. and the U.K. for the way it obtained data on as many as 87 million users from Facebook and for whether it used that data to
target voters on behalf of the Trump campaign in the U.S. and the Brexit referendum in the U.K.
He also told The Observer that the group harvested personal data and
targeted voters on Facebook with anti-EU messaging.
It reportedly also helped the Leave.EU campaign - on an informal basis - with profiling and
targeting voters on Facebook.
Not exact matches
French presidential candidate Emmanuel Macron's campaign said
on Friday it had been the
target of a «massive» computer hack that dumped its campaign mails online 1-1/2 days before
voters go to the polls to choose between the centrist and his far - right rival Marine Le Pen.
In September 2011, the Obama campaign launched Operation Vote, which focused
on eight
target groups: women, blacks, seniors, Hispanics, Asian - Americans, Jews, gays, and young
voters.
And according to a top - secret National Security Agency document leaked to the Intercept and published earlier this month, hackers associated with Russia's military intelligence agency
targeted a company with information
on US voting software days before the election and used the data to launch «
voter - registration - themed» cyberattacks
on local government officials.
The consulting firm relied
on Facebook data to profile and
target voters while advising the Trump campaign in 2016.
Rather than assuming that all women or African Americans or working - class whites will respond to the same message, they
target individual
voters with emotionally charged content — in other words, ads designed to tug
on emotional biases.
Kogan harvested and sold that data to Cambridge Analytica, a political firm that would use information
on identity, social networks and likes to
target demographics and influence
voters.
Through utilizing their vast troves of existing data
on individual
voters, constructing highly advanced data models, and prioritizing
voters by their likelihood to vote and feelings of favorability towards each candidate, Cambridge Analytica created a unique «principal audience» of
voters to
target.
As Cambridge Analytica's actions revealed, those groups will use data for startling purposes — such as
targeting very specific groups of
voters with highly customized messages — even if it means violating the policies and professed intentions of one of the most powerful corporations
on the planet.
A company whistleblower revealed that they advised the Trump campaign
on how to
target ads, both to boost Trump and suppress Democratic
voter turnout.
The project is detailed in the contract as a seven step process — with Kogan's company, GSR, generating an initial seed sample (though it does not specify how large this is here) using «online panels»; analyzing this seed training data using its own «psychometric inventories» to try to determine personality categories; the next step is Kogan's personality quiz app being deployed
on Facebook to gather the full dataset from respondents and also to scrape a subset of data from their Facebook friends (here it notes: «upon consent of the respondent, the GS Technology scrapes and retains the respondent's Facebook profile and a quantity of data
on that respondent's Facebook friends»); step 4 involves the psychometric data from the seed sample, plus the Facebook profile data and friend data all being run through proprietary modeling algorithms — which the contract specifies are based
on using Facebook likes to predict personality scores, with the stated aim of predicting the «psychological, dispositional and / or attitudinal facets of each Facebook record»; this then generates a series of scores per Facebook profile; step 6 is to match these psychometrically scored profiles with
voter record data held by SCL — with the goal of matching (and thus scoring) at least 2M
voter records for
targeting voters across the 11 states; the final step is for matched records to be returned to SCL, which would then be in a position to craft messages to
voters based
on their modeled psychometric scores.
In a later section,
on demographic distribution analysis, the contract mentions the possibility for additional «
targeted data collection procedures through multiple platforms» to be used — even including «brief phone scripts with single - trait questions» — in order to correct any skews that might be found once the Facebook data is matched with
voter databases in each state, (and assuming any «data gaps» could not be «filled in from
targeted online samples», as it also puts it).
The data was acquired and processed by Cambridge University professor Aleksandr Kogan whose personality quiz app, running
on Facebook's platform in 2014, was able to harvest personal data
on tens of millions of users (a subset of which Kogan turned into psychological profiles for CA to use for
targeting political messaging at US
voters).
In another section
on the political campaign page, Facebook states for $ 1, candidates could buy two pieces of direct mail, or they could
target 200
voters on Facebook.
The latest allegations — that a Trump campaign consulting firm with Russian connections used improperly obtained Facebook data
on tens of millions of Americans to
target voters — raise disturbing questions about the roles of both Facebook and Russia.
The overhaul came in response to increasing pressure Facebook endures over its potentially negative impact
on society, from sharing violent videos to letting fake news run unchecked to its late acknowledgement that Russian operatives had used to platform to
target U.S.
voters.
Those systemic problems have dramatically worsened since the presidential election, with Facebook coming under intense fire
on multiple fronts: Russian operatives using Facebook to manipulate
voter sentiment during the presidential election, Facebook accounts spreading «fake» news, the potential for its advertising system to be used for racist
targeting and its slow response to violent or harmful content
on the platform.
That's the question many Americans are asking after revelations that a data - mining firm working for the Trump campaign improperly got its hands
on the personal information of tens of millions of Facebook users and created detailed profiles that were used to
target unsuspecting
voters in the presidential election.
A personality research app he created gathered the personal information
on 270,000 Facebook users, as well as data
on those users» friends, amplifying the reach to the tens of millions when it passed that data to Cambridge for a
voter targeting scheme.
India's information technology minister last week warned against any abuse of social media in elections, following reports that the analytics firm improperly accessed information
on millions of Facebook users to
target U.S.
voters.
Multiple investigations later, it's become pretty clear that the deluge of disinformation
targeted to U.S.
voters on social media did have an effect, from online acrimony to real - world protests.
On Facebook, advertisers can upload lists of
voters and supporters to
target specific users as well as «lookalike» users who share similar demographics and traits.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg takes his seat after a break to continue to testify before a joint hearing of the Commerce and Judiciary Committees
on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, April 10, 2018, about the use of Facebook data to
target American
voters in the 2016 election.
Unfortunately, we don't yet know the extent of the harm, as is obvious from the news that Russians ads
on Facebook
targeted voters in Michigan and Wisconsin.
It uses such data to
target voters with hyper - specific appeals, including
on Facebook and other online services, that go well beyond traditional messaging based
on party affiliation alone.
Nobody seemed to care when President Obama's campaign used the same loophole to get data
on and
target tens of millions of
voters.
CNN: Anti-Obama mail piece: «We are no longer a Christian nation» Focus
on the Family, the Colorado - based social conservative organization founded by evangelical author and radio host James Dobson, is
targeting Iowa
voters with a mailing that quotes President Obama as saying «we are no longer a Christian nation.»
Des Moines, Iowa (CNN)-- Focus
on the Family, the Colorado - based social conservative organization founded by evangelical author and radio host James Dobson, is
targeting Iowa
voters with a mailing that quotes President Obama as saying «we are no longer a Christian nation.»
While the program is one of the rare issues that has managed to draw wide
voter support
on both sides of the aisle, some Republican leaders have
targeted it as an example of executive overreach.
Brock focused
on using information technology to build first - rate fundraising,
voter -
targeting, and opinion polling operations.
We recommend
targeting gullible
voters and influencers with fake articles
on Facebook in order to boost the reputation of the American Athletic Conference.
Though of course, even for some local races, ethnic niche sites (for instance) might well be perfect
targets — it all depends
on which
voters those campaigns need to reach and the relative costs of reaching them through different means.
The
targeting of these
voters is part of a five - figure digital ad buy (ad samples: 1, 2, 3, 4) that includes banner, Facebook, and pre-roll video ads exposing Republican nominee Greg Gianforte (R - MT) for trying to have it both ways
on healthcare reform.
Most digital political professionals will think of
voter file / cookie -
targeting or IP -
targeted online ads when the word «addressable» comes up, but more and more cable and satellite TV providers can now direct ads at specific households based
on demographic or
voter data.
Labour's problem is that its line
on this is quite fuzzy and confusing, largely because its
target voters are split straight down the middle
on the issue.
Queer Rising and Marriage Equality New York are planning to protest a fundraiser Senate Democratic Conference Leader John Sampson is headlining tomorrow for Sen. Ruben Diaz Sr., the outspoken Bronx lawmaker they have made a «key
target of a unified LGBTQ effort» to oust «no»
voters on gay marriage.
Addressable television's rise is choppy and uncomfortable, but in many places, a
voter file -
targeted pre-roll ad can end up
on a television screen instead of computer.
This year, Hillary Clinton's team raised hundreds of millions of dollars online, built a massive data and human infrastructure to turn out their
voters, invested their money in
targeted TV advertising, created opportunities for volunteers to work in their own social circles
on behalf of the candidate — all pieces Obama had shown should work.
Another consideration: just about any campaign can also benefit from having a body of clear, topical and
targeted content
on published
on the web in a variety of outlets, since
voters, bloggers and journalists alike will be turning to Google and other search engines for basic information about races and candidates.
If
voters in the United Kingdom weren't accustomed to encountering campaign ads
on television and the radio, how would they respond to such communications when
targeted with banner ads and videos online and
on their mobile devices?
Direct mail,
targeted cable tv buys and niche radio ads are all good ways to concentrate resources
on reaching particular
voters with particular messages.
Geo -
targeting, keyword -
targeting and the fact that search ads are pay - per - click makes this strategy cost - attractive — you can concentrate resources
on voters in particular states or metropolitan areas, and you only pay when you actually get a
voter contact (i.e., when someone clicks).
Regardless of their size, though, just about any campaign can also benefit from having a body of clear, topical and
targeted content
on the web in a variety of outlets, since
voters, bloggers and journalists alike will be turning to Mr. Google for basic information about local races.