The Trump campaign paid Cambridge Analytica more than $ 6 million to help
it target voters through ads on Facebook.
Not exact matches
Masses of data about each
voter's political tendencies - gathered
through public sources and
through campaign contact - allowed Obama for America (OFA) to
target voters more precisely than ever before.
The agencies said in a 2017 report that Russia engaged in a
targeted effort to influence US
voters through propaganda and other means, in order to swing the presidential election in Trump's favor.
Denise Feriozzi, deputy executive director for Emily's List, said that millennial women are a «hugely powerful group of
voters,» and that the ad campaigns are specifically
targeted toward building long - term support
through brands and outlets that they identify with.
Through utilizing their vast troves of existing data on individual
voters, constructing highly advanced data models, and prioritizing
voters by their likelihood to vote and feelings of favorability towards each candidate, Cambridge Analytica created a unique «principal audience» of
voters to
target.
The project is detailed in the contract as a seven step process — with Kogan's company, GSR, generating an initial seed sample (though it does not specify how large this is here) using «online panels»; analyzing this seed training data using its own «psychometric inventories» to try to determine personality categories; the next step is Kogan's personality quiz app being deployed on Facebook to gather the full dataset from respondents and also to scrape a subset of data from their Facebook friends (here it notes: «upon consent of the respondent, the GS Technology scrapes and retains the respondent's Facebook profile and a quantity of data on that respondent's Facebook friends»); step 4 involves the psychometric data from the seed sample, plus the Facebook profile data and friend data all being run
through proprietary modeling algorithms — which the contract specifies are based on using Facebook likes to predict personality scores, with the stated aim of predicting the «psychological, dispositional and / or attitudinal facets of each Facebook record»; this then generates a series of scores per Facebook profile; step 6 is to match these psychometrically scored profiles with
voter record data held by SCL — with the goal of matching (and thus scoring) at least 2M
voter records for
targeting voters across the 11 states; the final step is for matched records to be returned to SCL, which would then be in a position to craft messages to
voters based on their modeled psychometric scores.
In a later section, on demographic distribution analysis, the contract mentions the possibility for additional «
targeted data collection procedures
through multiple platforms» to be used — even including «brief phone scripts with single - trait questions» — in order to correct any skews that might be found once the Facebook data is matched with
voter databases in each state, (and assuming any «data gaps» could not be «filled in from
targeted online samples», as it also puts it).
Though of course, even for some local races, ethnic niche sites (for instance) might well be perfect
targets — it all depends on which
voters those campaigns need to reach and the relative costs of reaching them
through different means.
Hi folks, my latest Campaigns & Elections article is up, and it looks at some critiques of the new trend toward using online ad networks to
target individual
voters through online «cookies.»
But in competitive districts the new
targeting scheme makes it possible for campaign assemblages to leverage their considerable resources to actually expand the electorate in significant ways, both in terms of persuasion efforts and get - out - the - vote efforts — and when the stakes are high enough, even
through voter registration efforts.
The 74 - year - old senator's success, including his upset victory in the Michigan primary last week, has been fueled by his appeal to younger
voters, who so far have resisted Clinton's efforts to reach out to them
through targeted TV ads and an increased focus on issues such as student debt.
Online advertising (if
targeted correctly) would let them hit the right
voters with the right messages
through cost - effective channels, for instance, and it would also generate data (click rates, conversion rates, etc.) that would help the groups evaluate how well their messaging works with different demographics.
Both legislators were
targeted for recall after passing gun control legislation
through means that circumvented any possible
voter referendum.
I'm just back from traveling
through Texas and Louisiana, and it's always great to come home to an article as full of fun as this one: New Scientist reports from an e-crime summit in Pittsburg that in the coming years, «
voters will increasingly be
targeted by internet - based dirty tricks campaigns, and that the perpetrators will find it easier to cover their tracks.»
If supporters allowed it, the campaign could look
through their friends to find priority
voters already
targeted for outreach, and then ask the supporter to reach them with messages designed to appeal.
I'm just back from traveling
through Texas and Louisiana, and it's always great to come home to an article as full of fun as this one: New Scientist reports from an e-crime summit in Pittsburg that in the coming years, «
voters will increasingly be
targeted by internet - based...
The product matches supporters» Facebook friends to the
voter file, then walks supporters
through strategically
targeted interactions with their friends.
In addition to the forum, various progressive groups are discussing creating a #NoTrumpDemocrats campaign that would
target the IDC
through mass texting and phone call programs to Democratic
voters.
Why, after British journalists exposed in 2015 that the presidential campaign of Sen. Ted Cruz
targeted voters online using the resulting 40 million - plus psychological profiles — acquired by the firm Cambridge Analytica, backed by megadonor Robert Mercer — Facebook did not follow
through on a pledge to ensure the data destroyed.
Beginning in August, he said, the UFT will be
targeting voters in Pennsylvania, Ohio and Florida
through phone - banking and sending volunteers to those battleground states to help get out the vote.
«The company has repeatedly touted its ability to influence
voters through «psychographic»
targeting and has claimed it was the fundamental reason that Donald Trump won the 2016 election.
Less clear is their power as a tool for
targeted persuasion; Cambridge Analytica has claimed that OCEAN scores can be used to drive
voter and consumer behavior
through «microtargeting,» meaning narrowly tailored messages.
That reportedly included «suck [ing] out the entire social graph» — an individual's network of friends on Facebook — in a bid to
target more and more potential
voters through friends» friends on social media.
The firm believed those profiles were better predictors of how
voters could be swayed
through targeted ads than traditional data on party registration and voting patterns.
Then they used this data to help the Trump and Brexit campaigns psychologically manipulate
voters through targeted ads.
Though Facebook closed the door on developers being able to access friends» data when they download apps or quizzes on Facebook several years ago, the company didn't shut out mobile app developers from having access to Facebook users» lists of friends, which is what Clinton's campaign did
through an app her
voter -
targeting team made for supporters in 2016.
For example, pollsters have long used segmentation to
target particular groups of
voters, such as
through categorising audiences by gender, age, income, education and family size.
The project is detailed in the contract as a seven step process — with Kogan's company, GSR, generating an initial seed sample (though it does not specify how large this is here) using «online panels»; analyzing this seed training data using its own «psychometric inventories» to try to determine personality categories; the next step is Kogan's personality quiz app being deployed on Facebook to gather the full dataset from respondents and also to scrape a subset of data from their Facebook friends (here it notes: «upon consent of the respondent, the GS Technology scrapes and retains the respondent's Facebook profile and a quantity of data on that respondent's Facebook friends»); step 4 involves the psychometric data from the seed sample, plus the Facebook profile data and friend data all being run
through proprietary modeling algorithms — which the contract specifies are based on using Facebook likes to predict personality scores, with the stated aim of predicting the «psychological, dispositional and / or attitudinal facets of each Facebook record»; this then generates a series of scores per Facebook profile; step 6 is to match these psychometrically scored profiles with
voter record data held by SCL — with the goal of matching (and thus scoring) at least 2M
voter records for
targeting voters across the 11 states; the final step is for matched records to be returned to SCL, which would then be in a position to craft messages to
voters based on their modeled psychometric scores.
In a later section, on demographic distribution analysis, the contract mentions the possibility for additional «
targeted data collection procedures
through multiple platforms» to be used — even including «brief phone scripts with single - trait questions» — in order to correct any skews that might be found once the Facebook data is matched with
voter databases in each state, (and assuming any «data gaps» could not be «filled in from
targeted online samples», as it also puts it).
According to information posted on CA's website, its client won a landslide victory in the elections, achieving over 90 percent of total seats
targeted by CA
through in - depth electoral analysis and
targeting swing
voters.
If CA was able to obtain information on
voters through Facebook, they would know where to specifically
target propaganda to influence elections — just as Russia's Internet Research Agency did in 2016.