I believe if you are claiming or
tasked as a climate scientist, you should hold all of them because of the factor of interplay.
Not exact matches
The
task we set ourselves was a synthesis of all the new findings so that coral
scientists, conservationists and policy makers could get a really good over-view of what research areas are most promising
as global
climate continues to change.
Dr. Sterman and other social
scientists assessing
climate science and
climate policy say that a vital
task for President Obama and his
climate - energy team (and for
scientists and the media), even
as they weigh legislation and a treaty and technology, is to educate the public on the bathtub effect.
We will need complete transparency in the global temperature records and any «adjustments» made (techniques, methodologies),
as clearly
climate scientists are not up to the
task.
The problem,
as I've suggested above, is that the manpower and funding available to investigate all the fruitful avenues available for improving our understanding of
climate is woefully inadequate when compared to the
tasks which we
scientists have on our wish lists.
The IMPLICATIONS ARE: 1) The integrity of «
Climate Science» is in doubt (good work will get washed by this
as well) 2) The Integrity of CRU is in tatters; East Anglia and UK research not far behind 3) because these particular
scientists have demonstrated that they can't be trusted with such an important
task — a) Jones needs to go (minimum), wholesale shake - up and new mgmt (if allowed to continue to run) b) minimum data publication standards need to be defined and audited by Gov» t, and c) there needs to be strong oversight by an independent group of auditors (in somewhat an advesarial relationship) on integrity of data quality.
As in the previous report, Collins worked with an international team of
climate scientists tasked with evaluating the physical fidelity of the
climate models used in the IPCC's assessment.
I should begin by disclosing that
as a former project
scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, I was
tasked with thinking about how to combine data from different
climate models into probabilistic projections of regional
climate change.
Shaw was a regular on advisory committees and government
task forces, rubbing shoulders with many leading
climate scientists, including NASA's James Hansen and Columbia's Stephen Schneider, whom Exxon even considered
as a possible recruit, according to one document.