Those that didn't learn Jesus» truth on earth are
taught His truth when their spirits are back with Him.
Not exact matches
You must also not believe the Bible
when it tells us that Jesus Christ promises to guide and guard His Church until the end of time [so that evil will not prevail] and that the Bible says that Jesus Christ will bring His Apostles [which would include their successors] into remembrance of all that He
taught them and He would bring them into the fullness of
Truth as we can bear it.
When men
teach you they can only
teach you the
truth as given to them by men.
The greatest confusion of American parents: they believe they
teach their children
truths about those things as gods
when it is at best an indoctrination of unknowable mysteries.
Paul
taught salvation was a gift of God: Ephesians 2:8, Romans 5:15,16, and 18, 6:23 Paul
taught salvation occurred
when you believe the word of
truth: Ephesians 1:13 Paul
taught salvation was apart from works: Ephesians 2:9, Romans 11:6 Paul
taught the believer is indwelt and sealed by the Holy Spirit unto the day of redemption: Ephesians 1:13, Ephesians 4:30 Paul
taught repentance toward God, and faith toward our Lord Jesus Christ: Acts 20:21 Paul never
taught baptism for salvation 1 Corinthians 1:14 - 17 Paul received his knowledge of the gospel from Jesus Christ: Galatians 1:11 - 12
When we apply this position to Diem's original criticism of Käsemann, that the latter presented Jesus as only
teaching general
truths rather than the kerygma, it becomes clear that Diem has overlooked the crucial point: Käsemann went beyond the view that Jesus
taught God's fatherhood and man's freedom, to the assertion that «God has drawn near man in grace and requirement,» and Jesus «brought and lived the freedom of the children of God».
Today we make no record of the
teachings of this gospel of the kingdom lest,
when I have gone, you speedily become divided up into sundry groups of
truth contenders as a result of the diversity of your interpretation of my
teachings.
In my opinion, this advice here appears to be leading people on a path to reject God's
Truth, and is also
teaching that He applauds them
when they assess the words of the prophets as delusional.
When we see that the gospel contains a whole host of
truths and doctrines to believe and
teach and also a broad spectrum of behaviors to practice and obey, those who believe Christians should be listening to more sermons and attending more Bible studies can nod and smile toward those who prefer to be out feeding the poor and tending the sick, and vice versa.
Indeed, he believes that
when the Catholic Church formally responded to the
teaching of the Reformation at the Council of Trent in the mid-1500s (known as the Counter-Reformation), it denied the most important
truth that scripture gives us: that we are saved by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone.
Those who still cling to pre-scientific religious fictions, ignoring the
truths discovered through modern science, should at least take notice
when the biology department at the world's most prominent Baptist university, where a statement of faith is a prerequisite for
teaching, unequivocally support evolution through the following statement, which you can look up on their web site:
When I preached through Paul's letter to the Ephesians about 15 years ago, I
taught that if one has to choose between
truth or love, one should always choose
truth, for there is no such thing as a loving lie.
Nuns
when I was growing up got involved in political protests, they
taught school, and
truth be told, represent a more «Liberal» element that this now «far right wing» church.
How long did it take humans to believe the world wasnt flat, the center of the universe orbited by the sun even
when hard facts (not trillionth of partial scientific theorys but easily observable
truths) becuase the
teaching of religion contradicted them?
Evolution is not good for our children - it
teaches them that they are no more than monkey - brains,
when in
truth, each one was lovingly constructed by a God Who needs each individual for HIS purpose, not yours.
When you graciously
teach the
truth of the Word of God with the authority that it demands, people will not be able to get enough of it.
I also grew up in a time
when the Church failed to
teach Her people effectively, and as an adult, I began seeking the
truth and the answers myself, and found everything I needed was right there.
Years later,
when I started
teaching American history, I would use Frankenmuth to indicate to my students that the then - prevalent image of America as a melting pot did not capture the whole
truth of the nation's immigrant experience.
Study the life and
teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith and you can find out as I did
when the Holy Ghost confirmed the
truth of which I have just written to me and continues to as in our meetings today at church.
When, in reality, it's His
truth about the outcome He is
teaching and what directions if taken by an outlaw (aka criminal mentality) or a faithful person who respects His law.
With hundreds and maybe thousands of different churches and the same number of translations of the bible, how could anyone know the
truth when all churches, even in the same denomination
teach and believe differently.
Any dissent from the authoritative
teaching of our Holy Church has to contend with the inconvenient
truth that
when we reject the Church and its
teaching we reject Jesus Christ Himself.
When I had surgery for my cancer last March, my brother in Texas who is a fundamentalist «christian» who preaches at how his little group has the
Truth & the rest of us need to fall in line with what his church
teaches sent me a small note saying he was praying for me before the surgery.
And in fact this is just what we claim
when we say that through his life and
teaching we learn the deepest
truths about the nature of God.
One of the most important
truths you can discover
when seeking to learn what God is like and what the Bible
teaches about God is the
truth that Jesus reveals God to us and explains the Scriptures.
We have been
taught by books, pastors, seminaries, and Christian friends for so long to read the Bible a certain way and look for certain
truths in Scripture, that
when someone comes along and says, «Yeah, but did you notice the gorilla in the text?»
The pope, evidently, was willing for a time to tolerate dissent on an issue on which he had made a solemn, authoritative statement, hoping that the day would come
when, in a calmer cultural and ecclesiastical atmosphere, the
truth of that
teaching could be appreciated.
John Paul II
taught us to risk
truth and not be content with the modern assumption that peace can only be had
when we confess power as the most basic reality of our lives.
A lot of these comments show the lack of biblical
teaching and understanding of scripture in the home, of course its hard to
teach biblical
truth when the home is run by to men.
That, however, is not the way of life you learned
when you heard about Christ and were
taught in him in accordance with the
truth that is in Jesus.
He finds that the old images and
truths evoke and clarify what he is today
when «some other person» (Jesus, Jeremiah, Augustine, Bonhoeffer or whoever) brings them to the fore by
teaching him about them: it is not unknown for someone to find that the words of a service used day after day are the very words he is wanting to speak at present.
Msgr. Jaeger expanded upon that theme, noting that «while often presented as if it were absolutely new,» the
teaching of Nostra Aetate «perfectly corresponds to the most ancient intuitions of Christian theology»
when it affirms there can be, and in some cases are, «elements of
truth and holiness» in other religions, particularly Judaism, as explained by St. Paul in the Epistle to the Romans.
When Canonical verses are studied God leads the reader to be driven TOWARD being
taught, convicted (exposed to
truth), Up - erected (corrected), and disciplined in the [His Divine] JUSTice.
These loves create a multifaceted yet integral solidarity that
teaches another profound
truth: That which is most precious is magnified, not diminished,
when it is shared.
When many church members are convinced of the truth of the transformed teaching about Jesus Christ, and when they are convinced also of the supreme importance of this truth, then the church is heal
When many church members are convinced of the
truth of the transformed
teaching about Jesus Christ, and
when they are convinced also of the supreme importance of this truth, then the church is heal
when they are convinced also of the supreme importance of this
truth, then the church is healthy.
When you celebrate Xmas, I
teach my children the
truth and we celebrate the Winter Solstice.
When we allow Church
teaching and biblical proclamation to share in a common claim to
truth, the obvious differences, the puzzling divergences, and the unexpected harmonies will naturally compel our minds and draw us into elaborate arguments that interweave theological and biblical analysis.
It is simply an approach that accepts the
truth of Church
teaching when embarking on the difficult and daunting task of trying to discern the
truth the Bible
teaches.
He spoke in parables to certain people, for certain occasions, to accomplish certain purposes,
when teaching about certain
truths.
Difficulties stimulate the mind, and we certainly face lots of hard questions
when we assume that Scripture and doctrine
teach a single, unified
truth.
Here's another, scarcely less oratorical in character, from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith: the title of this document (another wonderful example of Vatican bogus academic language
when what is needed is a competent journalist used to writing informative headlines) is «Considerations regarding proposals to give legal recognition to unions between homosexual persons» (2003): The Church's
teaching on marriage and on the complementarity of the sexes reiterates a
truth that is evident to right reason and recognised as such by all the major cultures of the world.
When a bishop acts in persona Christi, fulfilling his duty to
teach on matters of faith and morals by identifying propositions to which he calls upon the faithful to assent, he presumably means to state
truths that belong to one and the same body of
truths: primarily, those entrusted by Jesus to his Church and, secondarily, those necessary to preserve the primary
truths as inviolable and / or to expound them with fidelity.
Since
truths like these can not supersede or annul one another, papal or other episcopal statements made while
teaching in persona Christi must be presumed to be consistent with one another
when carefully interpreted.
When the church is seen in this way the primary question about its
teachings is not their
truth or accuracy.
Those ordained to act in the person of Jesus do well to
teach the
truth as he did and went on doing even
when many of his disciples said they found his word too hard and drifted away.
Paul,
when describing the point of doctrines, wrote «and have been
taught by him, as the
truth is in Jesus» (Ephesians 4:21).
The missionary stratagem of withholding information is exposed by quoting page 9 of the «stake mission handbook» published by the Mormons: «The standard missionary discussions,
when they are
taught by the spirit, lead investigators carefully and systematically to a knowledge of these
truths.
So again,
when we talk about discipleship and the unbeliever, we can see that no matter what a person believes or doesn't believe about God, Jesus, sin, Scripture, and a whole host of other Christian
teachings, there is always room for us to talk with a person about what they believe (or don't believe) and hopefully bring them to a place that is somewhat closer to the
truth revealed through Jesus Christ and in the Scriptures.
Their preachers
taught God's
truth, unlike today
when preachers and rabbis tell folks what they want to hear (man made lies to stroke their egos) instead of Jesus»
truth.
The
truth,
when it is properly known, understood, and
taught, will always be spoken with love toward other people.