Sentences with phrase «taught anything in»

What you were probably taught if you were taught anything in high school or by your parents was that you've got to pay your bills at the end of the month.

You can teach anything in a garden.

Don't they teach you anything in school?

The bad comes from those who are peddling so called «services» that cost thousands of dollars and don't teach you anything in the process.

Not exact matches

This ignores how differently each of us learns and pretends that a single instructor standing in front of a classroom full of kids can effectively teach anything to all of them at the same time.

Please don't say that Tom Brady leading the Patriots back from 28 - 3 in the second half of the Super Bowl teaches you that you or anyone can overcome anything.

Trump believes in that part of his economic agenda more than anything else, and if Gary Cohn's exit taught us anything it's that any adviser now needs to get with that program or get out.

If the rise in popularity of «millennial pink» has taught us anything, it's that everything is better in rose gold.

If world events of the last six or eight months have taught us anything, it's that experts are not always right in their predictions.

While the title implies that this book deals only with how to achieve monetary wealth, the author explains that the philosophy taught in the book can be used to help individuals do or be almost anything they want in this world.

Readers, have you learned anything from the teachings of Benjamin Graham in your evolution as an investor?

I am extremely lucky to work in a job which causes me to be thanked countless times a day to which i have always replied with «no problem» or «no worries» and although my customers never seem to mind it drives me crazy mostly because I spent many years learning to speak and have spent many years teaching my children and think the constant use of one or two phrases over and over is limiting so just recently I have tried to use different phrases such as «your welcome» and «my pleasure» and anything else which springs to mind and is more suited to each scenario.

If the speculative bubbles and crashes across market history have taught us anything (particularly the repeated episodes of recklessness we've observed over the past two decades), it's this: regardless of the level of valuation at any point in time, we have to allow for the potential for investors to adopt a psychological preference toward risk - seeking speculation, and no amount of reason will dissuade them even when that speculation has already made a collapse inevitable over a longer horizon.

«He's taught me to be more charitable and to never do anything in business, or life for that matter that you wouldn't want published on the front page of your local newspaper.»

Unfortunately, paying for one's expenses with anything other than working for money is NOT taught in our educational system.

It's critical that you maintain a teaching / helping posture here, as the prospect may, in fact, not be thinking about buying anything at this time.

Well, from kindergarten on we often teach science as a body of information not relevant to anything going on in the world.

In 325AD, a bunch of churchmen came together and decided what should be in the bible, while tossing anything that contradicted what they wanted taughIn 325AD, a bunch of churchmen came together and decided what should be in the bible, while tossing anything that contradicted what they wanted taughin the bible, while tossing anything that contradicted what they wanted taught.

So if all the research and writing has taught me anything, it's that we have to engage in what we believe in.

Which, in case you've forgotten, teaches that «no... person, not even a priest, may add, remove, or change anything in the liturgy on his own authority.»

A tension arises between West's incredibly positive understanding of sex and the body and his teaching that sex in itself or anything else of this world, for that matter can never fully satisfy.

In fact, if there's anything on earth that unites the Church's adversaries — all of them except for the Muslims, anyway — the teaching against contraception is probably it.

While anything is possible it is not likely because of the types of language he used in his teachings.

Christ never taught the need to believe in anything like the creeds.

In all honesty, would you vote for a man that was a former imam of a mosque that advocates converting everyone to Islam, and teaches that all adherents should do anything, including lie, to advance the aims of creating a global kingdom for Allah on earth?

Nowhere in the catholic teachings is there anything about «honor killings.»

And especially after the Noachian Flood, did false religion take a leap, with false religious doctrines and practices such as the trinity, immortality of the soul, that God torments people in a «hellfire», the establishment of a clergy class, the teaching of «personal salvation» as more important than the sanctification of God's name of Jehovah (Matt 6:9), the sitting in a church while a religious leader preaches a sermon, but the «flock» is not required to do anything more, except put money when the basket is passed.

The schools are not able to teach these principles, however valiantly they may try, because a mannerly attitude and etiquette skills are prerequisites for learning anything at all in a school setting.

Firstly, I believe that we can never hear too much teaching about what it really means to walk in love, and if there is anything that the Church worldwide is lacking, it is probably that genuinely walking in love with everybody.

Teaching from the pulpit, for example, that God willed Adam and Eve to sin, that cancer is predestined by God, that prayer doesn't cause anything to change in the world, and that evangelism has no purpose since sheep are sheep and goats are goats?

Skytag: «If what Christianity teaches about God is true, why is it that only religions that share their roots with Christianity (such as Judaism) have anything significant in common with it?

You chose (or were taught by your parents most likely) to believe in god and disregard anything to the contrary.

That Protestant teaching thus degenerates into a mere power struggle is depressing enough; that it seems in the process to have lost its basis for believing, teaching, or confessing anything is far worse.

Psychologists have taught us much about ourselves in ways that seem quite different from anything we learn from Jesus.

It is hard, also, to equate enforced continence with the apostolic injunctions to remain in the state in which you were called and the Dominical teaching about not allowing anything to put the marriage bond asunder.

On the other hand, it gave a basic signpost on the way: the great truths taught in scripture are indeed the way of salvation, and those entrusted with the teaching office in the church have no right to use that office to teach anything else.»

The summer before I began teaching in a RCC school, first grade, I was going through the bookshelves and reading anything I wasn't familiar with.

Anyone who teaches anything contrary to what they taught, is in error.

Likewise, I may never understand why an evangelical will not consider as evidence of a flaw in the Bible's teachings anything not also derived from the Bible.

He or she might agree with some of the Bible's teachings if those things line up with his view of life, but he or she doesn't accept anything just because «it's in the Bible.»

I don't see anything remotely wrong or uncoufe in this suggestion; to the contrary, I see it taught not only in scripture, but in the VAST majority of texts on human nature.

Common sense is anything but common in a land where some churches teach you to hate people who are different than you, where the media blasts you with unfettered violence and when our schools have been gutted by the greed of those who don't wish to pay to educate the next generation.

In the end, if the Bible teaches us anything, it is that each one of us is loved by God not because of how right we are but because God graciously and mercifully accepts us, sometimes despite the positions we adopt.

In other words, Pope Paul VI teaches that sex need not have anything to do with babies.

But if the twentieth century's experiments in a brave new world have taught us anything, it is that attempts to institutionalize a revolution in global human solidarity have a way of repeating and amplifying the permanent problems of humanity.

Now, I'm not saying that anything in this book contradicts what we are taught about Jesus.

If I've learned anything over the past few years it's been that when the rains come down and the floods come up, when doubt and frustration whip like wind against my faith, all the apologetics in the world can't ground me like the simple, yet profoundly challenging teachings of Jesus Christ.

At a time when Rabbi Soloveichik is so rightfully appalled by «the actions of a man [obviously, Yasir Arafat] who... sent children [as suicide bombers] to kill children [and to kill themselves by so doing],» he should be more careful in picking, of all people, Samson, to teach us anything.

I certainly did not get the idea from those verses of anything like total depravity or that fallen man had to experience any kind of supernatural transformation of the will / heart in order to be able to accept God's convicting / convincing / persuading / call / drawing, instructions, teachings, commands, promises and gifts.

So if what Jesus said to Philip can't be used to teach us about the nature and character of God because it's historical narrative, then this same argument applies to every text in the Bible, and you can also not use anything from the Law, the Writings, the Prophets, the Gospels, or the Epistles.