I've
taught at the Law Society Bar Admission course in Family Law for over 20 years.
I discovered that social media and blogging was not only
taught at the law school, but that students needed to use what they learned over a semester or more.
It is a fundamental principle, and one of the first things that all lawyers are
taught at law school, that legal advice (rather than, for example, commercial advice) communications between a client and lawyer are privileged.
Practical how - to information was mentioned again and again (often with a distinction from what's
taught at law school).
It is not
taught at law school and almost every e-discovery lawyer in Canada is self - taught through necessity, which is not efficient and can lead to serious mistakes.
We need input from other disciplines that understand human behaviour (this is not
taught at law school)
This is something that isn't
taught at law school.
We argue that the recommendation that targets what
we teach at law school is a moment for looking broadly at how we offer law students diverse opportunities for engaging with the hardest questions a society can ask of itself.
Our lawyers speak at seminars and conferences,
teach at law schools and universities, and write and publish within their areas of expertise.
Forty - two full - time, tenure - track professors
teach at the Law School.
When
you teach at law school, as I have, you become familiar with a variety of reasons as to why students choose to study law — perhaps there's a history of lawyers in the family; or their parents want them to do something, anything professional; or they want to right wrongs, get that BMW, enter politics, point damning fingers at witnesses... Even with those students who wound up in law school with apparently only a shrug for a reason, some explanation eventually surfaced.
Not exact matches
During a break
at a conference where I was
teaching the 21
Laws, a young college student came up to me and said: «I know you are
teaching 21
Laws of Leadership, but I want to get to the bottom line.»
He also is a professor
at the San Diego State University College of Business Administration where he
teaches classes in business ethics and employment
law.
Income - tax - evasion rates in Argentina are roughly 60 percent, and evasion of the value - added tax is roughly 40 percent, according to Marcelo Bergman, a professor
at Mexico City's Center for Economic Research and
Teaching and the author of Tax Evasion and the Rule of
Law in Latin America.
In November, the
Teaching Tolerance project
at the Southern Poverty
Law Center received more than 10,000 responses to an educator survey indicating an uptick in anti-Semitic, anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant activity in schools.
A Harvard
Law graduate, Saba has served as an assistant secretary in the U.S. Department of Energy and
taught at Georgetown and American University.
Dr. Ryan J. Orr is executive director
at Stanford University's Collaboratory for Research on Global Projects and
teaches classes on Global Project Finance and Infrastructure Investment to
law, business, and engineering graduate students.
Under federal securities rules, public companies aren't supposed to disclose «material information» about their business performance unless it's made widely available to the public, noted Stephen Diamond, an associate professor who
teaches securities
law at Santa Clara University.
He asked me if I was a lawyer and I told him I
taught law at Strathclyde.
Governance expert Richard Leblanc, who
teaches law, governance, and ethics
at York University, echoes this and says that while people like Curran come with the appropriate transactional experience a board would be interested in, many in - house lawyers do not.
After stints
teaching law at Marquette and the University of Wisconsin - Madison's Law School, Strang also began teaching continuing education classes at U of W. (The most recent cour
law at Marquette and the University of Wisconsin - Madison's
Law School, Strang also began teaching continuing education classes at U of W. (The most recent cour
Law School, Strang also began
teaching continuing education classes
at U of W. (The most recent course,
Passionate about working with developing entrepreneurs and
law students, Mr. Mason has taught as an adjunct instructor at the University of North Carolina's Kenan - Flagler Business School and the University of North Carolina School of L
law students, Mr. Mason has
taught as an adjunct instructor
at the University of North Carolina's Kenan - Flagler Business School and the University of North Carolina School of
LawLaw.
He
teaches at the University of California, San Diego, department of political science and practices
law at Constantine Cannon.
He was a graduate research fellow
at Harvard
Law School's Program on Negotiation and has
taught at both Johns Hopkins University's Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies and Zanvyl Krieger School of Arts and Sciences.
In addition, he is actively involved with research on angel investing through research and
teaching at Harvard Business School, MIT, BC
Law School, BU School of Management, Darden Business School, Univ. of VA, and Babson College.
In addition to his
law practice, Ken is an Adjunct Professor at Osgoode Hall Law School, teaching Communications L
law practice, Ken is an Adjunct Professor
at Osgoode Hall
Law School, teaching Communications L
Law School,
teaching Communications
LawLaw.
Before joining GW in 2007, Professor Cunningham
taught at Boston College
Law School, where he served a two - year term as Associate Dean for Academic Affairs.
Mr. Henry also
taught at the University of Oklahoma Honors College (Oxford Program), the University of Oklahoma College of
Law, and Oklahoma Baptist University (Business
Law) and served as Distinguished Judge in Residence
at the University of Tulsa College of
Law.
Charles J. Reid, Jr., who
teaches law at the University of St. Thomas in Minnesota, recently posted something
at a blog (tellingly called www.religiousleftlaw.com), which the National Catholic Reporter picked up and ran as an op - ed, in print and online, under the title «Archbishop Chaput's right - wing funk.»
There are many respectable authors, renowned for their prestige in theology and canon
law, who
at present warn about the danger of simplifying or even adulterating these
teachings.
(You will notice he goes on to make the «
teachings» of G - d HARDER than the ones
at Mt. Sinai, something a revered Rabbi would be allowed to do under Jewish «
law»).
Not all Jews believe this, BTW, but in Judaism I have yet to run across someone who believe that G - d would punish anyone for their «beliefs» and not their «deeds» (take a good look
at the Tanach... the contract with the Jews (known as the «
teachings of G - d», not «the
law») is all about behaviour; and while many Christians have been raised to view «the
teachings of G - d» (the
law) as something to be «freed» from... one has to ask the simple question..
Jeremy A. Rabkin is a Professor of
Law at George Mason University's Antonin Scalia Law School, where he teaches international law and foreign relatio
Law at George Mason University's Antonin Scalia
Law School, where he teaches international law and foreign relatio
Law School, where he
teaches international
law and foreign relatio
law and foreign relations.
The ordained leaders of the Church, and the laity who are Christ's principal witnesses in the public square, do not enter public life proclaiming, «The Church
teaches...» When the question
at issue is an immoral practice, they enter the debate saying, «This is wicked; it can not be sanctioned by the
law and here is why, as any reasonable person will grasp.»
Acts 4:18 - 19: Then [the rulers, the elders and the teachers of the
law] called them in again and commanded them not to speak or
teach at all in the name of Jesus.
Yesterday my friend Rick Garnett, who
teaches law at Notre Dame and blogs
at Mirror of Justice, took issue with my article (and White's).
The treatment of the Nazi period in all its aspects - Hitler's rise to power; his establishment of a dictatorship in Germany; the abolition of the rule of
law; the persecution of all kinds of political opponents; the racially motivated persecution of the Jews, culminating in the Holocaust; the reticence and opposition of German citizens; and, Germany's instigation of World War II - is compulsory
teaching matter
at all types of schools in Germany and
at all levels of education.
I
teach Jewish
law and history
at a synagogue.
As for the
law and it's «demands» — well — why should God's
teachings be a labor
at all?
Possibly, but why did the person who
taught him know it was wrong... ad infinitum... eventually you have to come to the fact that there must have been a moral
law giver (ie God)
at some point.
He was the Ames Professor of
Law at Harvard and taught there for more than thirty years before moving, in the late 1980s, to the Emory University law school, where he helped establish the Center on Law and Religi
Law at Harvard and
taught there for more than thirty years before moving, in the late 1980s, to the Emory University
law school, where he helped establish the Center on Law and Religi
law school, where he helped establish the Center on
Law and Religi
Law and Religion.
jwt, yeahright, tom tom on the pipe, and others YHWH made this
law of life for all the people of this earth, so to say your god is redundant, and
at a lost for as He states in Isaiah 56, and in Exodus 33 vs. 16 this is for all nations, and people of this earth those who were mislead, and not
taught properly by these priest, popes, false prophets, elders, and shepherds, as YHWH
taught us of them all misleading the flocks, in Malachi 2, Jeremiah 23 vs.1 - 8, Ezekiel 20, and Ezekiel 34, yet YHWH will save them all when His day comes, as said in Isaiah 51 vs. 5, that His righteousness is near.
What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women
teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the
laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began
at the resurrection.
There are no ethical absolutes for us in the
Law or in the teaching of Christ and the apostles, and there is no natural law, at least not one about which any reliable conclusions can be dra
Law or in the
teaching of Christ and the apostles, and there is no natural
law, at least not one about which any reliable conclusions can be dra
law,
at least not one about which any reliable conclusions can be drawn.
He is also an Adjunct Professor of
Law at Georgetown University
Law Center, where he
teaches First Amendment Church - State
Law and Jewish
Law.
Arden said she was
taught by a supervisor
at the church's nursery how to opt out of a Texas
law that requires most children to be immunized.
Another cause for concern is the way the christian agenda is pushed right here: christian religious beliefs to be
taught as science, christian religious texts on public buildings, christian prayers
at public meetings, christian beliefs as
law, etc..
Father Weber, S.J.,
teaches political science and constitutional
law at Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Examples are 9/11 hijackings, The holding back of stem cell research that could save countless human lives, Aids being spread due to religious opposition to the use of condoms, Christians legally fighting this year to
teach over 1 million young girls in America that they must always be obedient to men, the eroding of child protection
laws in America by Christians, for so called faith based healing alternatives that place children's health and safety
at risk, burning of witches, the crusades, The Nazi belief that the Aryans were god's chosen to rule the world, etc... But who cares about evidence in the real world when we have our imaginations and delusions about gods with no evidence of them existing.
On the other hand, there is capitalism which, in its practical aspect,
at the level of its basic principles, would be acceptable from the point of view of the Church's social
teaching, since in various ways it is in conformity with the natural
law....