I've
taught that way before to high reviews.
Not exact matches
The best
way to understand why she was drawn to it, she says, is to look at everything she was doing
before it came along: She spent time organizing the 2012 SOPA protests against internet censorship; her graduate work at Harvard University included research on the spontaneous organization on the Internet; and she's
taught classes at Stanford on the Internet copyright wars.
Thanks for the award by the
way, considering it's coming from you I guess I still have a lot left for you to
teach me
before becoming a presenter at the d - bag awards huh?
We need not address the emotional or spiritual causes of our sadness to have the cloud of depression lift; we need not question the
way we
teach our children
before we can rid them of attention deficit disorder.»
Buddhism (in its true form) provides a guide to the elimination of suffering, not deity worship; in fact never talks about God or gods in the sense the west does... FYI Buddha was born 630 years
before Jesus, and it is proven that Buddhism traveled from eastern India all the
way to Syria and the Middle East via the Silk Road... i am quite sure Jesus had heard some of his
teachings... some of the things that Jesus says are a direct reflection of the eightfold path from buddhism... Jesus was the greatest salesman of all time... sold the most books in history... he really honestly does nt deserve worship but an Academy Award
But without in any
way glorifying suffering or pretending that it is not evil, Christians worship a God who wills to be with us in our dependence,
teaching us «attentiveness
before a good and nurturant God.»
Even as a young Catholic student I was always
taught that, while giving up something for Lent is a
way to mimic Jesus» 40 days of fasting
before his death, a more modern — and more true to the spirit of Jesus — approach is to find a
way to DO something that has a positive impact on someone else and yourself.
Lent is a
way to remind yourself each day for the 40 days
before Easter that you are a Christian and that you have behaviors that are not in line with God's
teachings and allows you to devote more time and thought to those things.
What is common to the
ways they
teach and the goals they set
before us?
Rabbi Neuberger asserted that «it's really important that one accepts that... new scientific research has
taught us... that the human embryo is not as unique as we thought
before... We do have to think differently about the «unique quality of human embryos» in the
way that Peter Saunders is saying... The miracle of creation... may have to be explained somewhat differently... Our human brains are given to us by God... to better the life of other human beings... and if this technology can do it..., and I don't believe that anybody is going to research beyond fourteen days, then so be it, lets do it.»
It
teaches them that their thinking comes
before God, rather than the other
way around.
But the fact of the matter is that as powerful as science is, it has a long
way to go
before it can offer anything nearly as complete and practical and useful to the subjective lives of human beings as the
teachings of the various world religions.
Jews and Muslims believe that it is far better to
teach people how, practically and realistically, it is best to live in our actual world than to hold
before them an ideal
way of living that can not be achieved.
The author
teaches at St. Vladimir's Seminary in Crestwood, New York, and here provides from an emphatically Orthodox perspective an exploration into the
ways that the Cross of Christ was and is the hermeneutical key to understanding all that went
before and has followed after.
Cf. Buber's important Foreword to Pointing the
Way, p. ix - x, in which he states that he has included «The
Teaching of the Tao» in this collection because it belongs to that «mystical» «stage that I had to pass through
before I could enter into an independent relationship with being.»
Thanks David — that helps some
way to me understanding where you are coming from with what you mentioned
before with your view — «abuse can happen under the guise of
teaching that is not false».
From the shallow lakeside waters in Galilee, people are fed by his
teaching in a
way never experienced
before.
Is it possible and after reading about it i kept on thinking «i will sell to my soul for 20 carats get out shut up i will never ever sell my soul to you oh god please help me and this is continuing for a few days i am afraid that i have sold my sold to the devil have i please help and still i think god's
way of allowing others to hate him us much worse even you know and can easily think think about much better punishments like rebirth after being punished for all the sins in life and i am feeling put on the sin of those who committed the unforgiviable sin (the early 0th century priests) imagine them burning in hell fire till now for 2000 years hopelessly screaming to god for help i can't belive the mercy of god are they forgiven even though commiting this sin keans going to hell for entinity thank you and congralutions i think the 7 year tribulation periodvis over in 18th century the great commect shooting and in 19th century the sun became dark for a day and moon was not visible on the earth but now satun has the domination over me those who don't belive in jesus crist i used to belive in him but now after knowing a lot in science it is getting harharder to belive in him even though i know that he exsists and i only belived in him not that he died for me in the cross and also not for eternal life and i still sin as much as i used to
before but only a little reduced and i didn't accept satan as my master but what can i do because those who knowingly sin a lot and don't belive in jesus christ has to accept satan as their master because he only
teaches us that even though he is evil he gives us complete freedom but thr followers of jesus and god only have freedom because they can sin only with in a limit and no more but recive their reward after their life in heaven but the followers of satun have to go to hell butbi don't want to go to hell and be ruled by the cruel tryant but still why didn't god destroy satun long
way before and i think it was also Adam and eve's fault also they could have blamed satan and could have also get their punishment reduced but they didn't and today we are seeing the result
So, for instance, if it is not clear to the readers of my work that my writing is done by an Episcopalian Christian, I will have failed to practice this virtue — which, of course, includes my making clear at which points the materials I study or engage seem to me false, noxious, or incomplete; just as it includes my making clear when and in what
ways it seems to me that the materials I engage are true, have
taught me something I didn't know
before, or may be of use to me and my community in its search to apprehend and incarnate the gospel.
Religion goes out of it's
way to
teach their ridiculous beliefs to children at a young age...
before they're old enough to realize just how ridiculous those beliefs actually are.
However, to return to the main issue
before us, it may seem that we are being disloyal to traditional Christian
teaching if we in any
way cast doubt on the universal and unsurpassable character of Jesus the Christ as decisively revelatory of God.
The Calvinistic doctrine of Total Depravity does not
teach that each of us goes astray or turns away, but rather that we are born that
way, that
before we can even make a choice for good or evil, we are predisposed to only choose the evil.
As I thought about how to apply these
teachings practically, a lot of strategies came to mind — putting the needs of others
before my own, buying less and giving more, humbling myself when engaged in political or theological debates, embracing rather than complaining about those «one -
way relationships,» praying for others more sincerely, saying «yes» a little more often, working on that ubiquitous sense of entitlement and pride that keeps me from going the extra mile.
I've never thought of believing in my soul merely as a
way to eternal life and I wasn't
taught as a child about my soul or the Bible - for as long as I can remember I felt communion with the earth and nature, and was fully aware of my soul and spirit, years
before I ever learned of such things in the Bible.
So blogging through seminary is going to allow me to process what I was
taught, and reflect upon it in a
way that I was able to do
before.
I
taught myself how to make paints the
way they were made for centuries
before there were synthetic colors.
like i said
before Wenger & the club should have handpicked someone years ago and been
taught the arsenal
way or the Wenger, s if there any difference:) learning from one the best manager ever for few years couldn, t have been a bad thing??
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming
before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't
teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no
way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is
way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long
before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks
before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many
ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and
way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
You're getting guys who have played
before and are
teaching the kids the right
way to play at an early age.»
We buy talented youngsters and
teach them to play The Arsenal
Way before being integrated into the team.
Before coming to Stanford, Yeager had
taught English at a low - income school in Tulsa, and he was especially motivated to find
ways to translate some of this innovative research into practices that could help teachers improve the lives of their students.
Also, do you suggest letting your baby play with their own spoon when they eat (
before they are ready to try themselves), or
teaching them to keep their arms down and out of the
way when you feed them until they are ready to feed themselves?
Before you jump to any conclusions, however, consider that positive discipline may be an effective
way to
teach your children valuable life lessons.
I actually got ask that question quite often when I
teach breastfeeding classes about whether a mom should toughen up her nipples prenatally
before the baby gets here so that
way they're not so sore when baby is born.
As frustrating as a finicky eater may be, this is a great time to
teach your child to try new things,
before he gets too set in his
ways and begins to reject new foods as a
way of asserting his independence (a distinct possibility as he nears his second birthday!).
Grantees implement programs which
teach parents and early education providers about
ways to strengthen families and build protective factors (such as parenting skills and resilience in times of stress; building social connections and a support network; and knowledge of child development) in an effort to prevent child abuse and neglect
before it begins.
«Child - centered» refers to a
way of guiding children in which parents watch for their kids to show readiness or interest
before they begin real
teaching or training.
Along with being a surefire
way to calm your child
before bedtime, the book is also great for
teaching about various objects in a room.
This is a great
way for your kids to let off some extra energy right
before the holidays and
teach them a valuable lesson about giving back to their community.
Teaching your baby sign language can be a fun and rewarding
way to start communicating with your little one
before they learn to verbally make their requests.
As I've written here many times
before, I've come to believe that the only
way we can wean children off highly processed and fast food is by not only
teaching them why such foods are detrimental to their health but also
teaching them how to prepare healthy food at home.
Kinnock was my big political hero — in fact, my last political hero, back
before the Blair years
taught me the hard
way that idolising politicians is a mug's game.
Before sailing off to Troy, Odysseus placed his son under the watchful eye of Mentor, a wise friend to
teach the boy the
ways of the world and act as his role model.
The
way math is currently
taught, «students typically work a set of practice problems devoted to the immediately preceding lesson, which means they often know the appropriate strategy for each problem
before they read the problem,» says Douglas Rohrer, professor of psychology at the University of South Florida.
Evolution is a difficult concept for many students at all levels, however, a study publishing on May 23 in the open access journal PLOS Biology has demonstrated a simple cost - free
way to significantly improve students» understanding of evolution at the secondary level:
teach genetics
before you
teach them evolution.
For real happiness to exist within any of us, we must re-program the
way we were
taught to place others
before us, and meditation can play a key role in this process.
I practice Ashtanga Yoga in the
way Ronald has
taught me, combined with the techniques which I have learned over the course of my yoga journey
before that point from so many wonderful teachers.
Teachers in these styles must study with senior, experienced teachers, who learned from senior, experienced teachers
before them, but at some point in their studies will be encouraged to find their own «voice,» and explore their own
way of
teaching within the style.
As a working professional and a competitive amateur triathlete, mentally, her class and
teachings have grounded me in a
way that I have never experienced
before.
To
teach you to retrain your brain so you can learn how to connect with your body in a
way you never have
before, leaving you feeling empowered so you're able to shift how you think about yourself, which in turn, affects every decision you make around food.