Sentences with phrase «taught the theory of»

Many people have been taught the theory of evolution as the method by which we got the world as we now see it.

It has been close to two hundred years that we have been teaching the theory of evolution in our universities, yet still almost 50 % of America don't believe in it or believe God is involved.

You can try and teach me the theory of creationism... oh wait it does not quality as a theory.

You can try and teach me the THEORY of evolution in school, but I have the right to walk out and be taught something else.

Well then you might as well teach the theories of the creation in the Kuran, the Buddhist ideas, and heck why not throw in the Incans and Mayans as well.

Gardner cautions that when religious superstition should be on the wane, it is easy «to forget that thousands of high school teachers of biology, in many of our southern states, are still afraid to teach the theory of evolution for fear of losing their jobs.»

«The biggest problem is that there are only 5 — 10 evolutionary scientists in the country who teach the theory of evolution in undergraduate and graduate schools,» he says.

In 1925 a Tennessee teacher of biology named Thomas Scopes was tried for teaching the theory of evolution.

The Louisiana Supreme Court last week upheld the right of the state legislature to require schools to teach the theory of «creation science» along with «evolution science.»

It teaches you the theory of diving — physics, physiology, decompression theory, equipment, skills and environment, as well as skills circuits, mapping, assisting, teaching, general day to day running's of a dive shop, paperwork, signing in guests, selling equipment etc etc!

It teaches you the theory of diving — physics, physiology, decompression theory, equipment, skills and environment, as well as skills practice, mapping, assisting, teaching and the general day to day running's of a dive shop.

I'm now teaching a Theory of Landscape Painting at The Art Guild, 200 Port Washington Blvd., Manhasset, NY.

Responsible for teaching theories of various dance forms like contemporary, ballet and hip hop

As a graduate school Professor for over ten years, I have taught the theories of marriage and family therapy for over ten years and facilitated the couples training program at a Community Mental Health Center as well.

But points 1 and 3 deal more specifically with one's power of observation, and thereafter, one's ability to learn from same and adjust one's behaviour accordingly, vs applying the same - old, same - old, one - size - fits - all conventionally - taught theories of collective manipulation tactics ostensibly to be applied to differing situations / circumstances.

Not exact matches

I learned conversational Korean, studied everything from string theory physics to ancient Greek and even taught myself the basics of computer programming without the internet, using textbooks.

In 1997, Moore linked the theory of evolution to violent crime: «They're acting like animals because we've taught them they come from animals,» Moore said.

Valdis Krebs of Orgnet explains that «Schools are still stuck on teaching 20th century math for building things rather than 21st century math for understanding things» and suggests that curriculums focus less on the mathematics of engineering (e.g. algebra and calculus) and more on the mathematics of patterns (e.g. set theory, graph theory, etc.).

Peoples» attention has been distracted into speculation about of how they might get rich in a parallel universe that might exist in theory — if one accepts the narrow - minded assumptions that are being taught — but whose most important real - world consequence is to impose a debt spiral on America and other nations.

Loss - aversion theory teaches us that the fear of loss can be nearly twice as powerful as the hope of earning a reward.

In the real world, this is simply not true» Guy Spier «A whole body of academic work formed the foundation upon which generations of students at the country's major business schools were taught about Modern Portfolio Theory, Efficient Market Theory and Beta.

If you've been reading some of my recent posts, you will have noted my, and the Investment Masters belief, that many of the investment theories taught in most business schools are flawed.

Self - taught, his management style is based on the strict application of the principles of value management (Graham, Buffet, Peter Lynch, etc.), underpinned by a deep understanding of the Austrian theory of economic cycles.

Many of the theories which were taught as scientific fact have been proved wrong.

Evolutionary Theory is the cornerstone of modern biology and well deserves to be taught in every science classroom.

Evolutionary theory deserves to be taught in every classroom because it is the cornerstone of modern Biology.

Of course not, but we don't teach theories that don't have strong scientific backing.

How about teaching different theories on our creation beside the unproven theory of evolution?

but not taught as fact and right after science class where they learn Darwin's theory of evolution, watch videos on the big bang theory, have a field trip where they meet up with an archeologist to uncover one of our ancestors remains that weren't as evolved, learn how old the earth truely is etc.....

Unlike Anselm's legalistic theory of the Atonement, the writings of the Early Church Fathers teach theosis or deification, the realization of our human potential for godlikeness through a relational participation in the Divine Life, as the source of our redemption in Christ:

This fake rapture theory goes against Jesus» truth that He returns to His favorite place on earth, that we are to endure to the end, the meek shall inherit the earth for examples of some of his scriptures that contradict that teaching.

It is an important issue and if you look around, the fanatics are the ones who put their faith in theories like evolution and they are forcing themselves on every aspect of life and Bill said it himself, he wants your child taught evolution and the evolutionist will fight to indoctinate every child.

Ever hear of a University in Europe, china, Ja.pan or Australia teach the «talking snake» theory?

The lives of the saints do not present us with a new theory of virtue, but a new way of teaching, a new strategy that builds on the tradition of examples, but enriches it by unfolding a pattern of holiness over the course of a lifetime.

Science has taught us extraordinary truths about this universe — from what composes matter (atomic physics), to the great variety and forms of life (evolution) to medicine (germ theory of disease).

And for the record teaching evolution is teaching a theory and does not necessarily contradict the concept of creationism.

On March 11, 2002 during a panel discussion on evolution Meyer publicly told the Ohio Board of Education that the «Santorum Amendment» was part of the Education Bill, and therefore that the State of Ohio was required to teach alternative theories to evolution as part of its biology curriculum.

Popular acceptance of the theory comes largely from C.I. Scofield, who taught the view in the footnotes of his Scofield Reference Bible.

Since no one has yet to SEE an atom, the idea of the structure of the atom can only be inferred by experimental evidence — yet I see no Republican trying to stop teaching the structure of the atom in school — oh that's right, its because major corporations and industries rely on this science (pharm, weapons manufacturers etc etc) whereas the theory of evolution is merely think piece of scientists on how life on Earth changes over time.

The theory is not uncontroversial even among Muslims, many of whom believe that teaching anything other than the «substitution» model is tantamount to heresy.

hey G, I am acquainted with your theory there... it is called Preterism... it is the standard interpretation of Revelation given by liberals... I walked away from that belief and the church I was raised in when I found out what they are teaching... Nope, the book of revelation is not a «code» for the events of the day at the time of the fall of Jerusalem.

Or Russell Hittinger's path - breaking «Two Thomisms, Two Modernities»: «The past century and a half of papal teaching on modern times often seems a tangle: any number of different strands — theology, Thomistic philosophy, social theory, economics — all snarled together.

The view of the atonement that you have been taught (Penal Substitution) is one of four or five major theories on the atonement.

The biblical teaching, after all, was not aimed at one or another of the various theories developed in the history of modern science but at the cosmological understandings of origins found among surrounding peoples.

«The creation story is taught in science and there is no evidence that pupils learn scientific theories about the origin of the Earth.»

By saying there is no room for «personal salvation» in your understanding of Jesus» teaching and then claiming that personal salvation gets us to the topic of atonement theory — what was it that you were wanting to say if not making a link between atonement theory and salvation?

The past century and a half of papal teaching on modern times often seems a tangle: any number of different strands — theology, Thomistic philosophy, social theory, economics — all snarled together.

Most of the 350 - plus books written by «creation scientists» consist in large part of discussions of the supposed errors of evolutionary teaching, reviewing vast amounts of technical scientific data and theory, challenging this or that piece of evidence, method of dating or use of data, while producing evidences and counterarguments of their own in favor of a young earth, recent humanity, worldwide flood, etc..

I was in my early twenties when I first encountered a fossil record that didn't match what I'd been taught in Sunday school about the «myth» of evolutionary theory.

If, as some persons maintain, Christianity was a total transformation of the message of Jesus — a doctrine about Jesus rather than Jesus» own teaching — then it is of paramount importance to see how and why this transformation took place, or rather, first of all, whether the theory of transformation is true.