Sentences with phrase «tautologies do»

Christ - centered tautologies don't help us here.

Obviously, that tautology does not satisfy.

Not exact matches

When Ezra cries, «Thou our God hast punished us less than our iniquities deserve,» (Daniel 9:16) or a prayer in the Book of Nehemiah says, «Thou art just in all that is come upon us; for thou hast dealt truly, but we have done wickedly,» (Nehemiah 9:33) or Daniel exhausts tautology in confessing, «We have sinned, and have dealt perversely, and have done wickedly, and have rebelled,» (Daniel 9:5) we see the self - accusation which resulted from the acceptance of national misfortune not as an evidence of Yahweh's weakness in protecting his people but as proof of his inflexible righteousness.

In this sense, everything that emerges from non-existence is true, but this statement is a tautology and does not say anything new.

Science does not try to explain anything «before existence,» because it's considered a tautology: an unanswerable question within the sphere of human understanding.

To say, «all the people you are allowed to vote for are subject to popular vote» is a tautology, but doesn't answer the question, «who is really in charge?»

I also do nt think the implication was that teachers are the cause of statistical tautologies, rather that the nature of the distribution is meaningful, especially if teachers or district... Read More

• express yourself; • show your competence; • be interactive, try to entertain a reader — not to overload; • follow your writing clarity; • do not plagiarize (rephrase, just in case); • do not use tautology, it sounds awful.

Similarly, do you think a man who goes every day to his job at an accounting firm, adds up beans all day long, watches popular movies when they come out, goes to his childrens» games on the weekend and has the occasional beer while cooking burgers on the grill in the backyard while not contemplating the mysteries of the universe or the necessarily self - referencing tautologies used to explain the existence of consciousness is enjoying life any less than you?

Yurshansky takes care to widen the gaps of visual description so that the viewer has room to project their own meaning onto each piece, in order to ensure that the works do not enforce their own tautology.

Only that your specific example (v =D / t) was a tautology (and has nothing specific to do with Newton's Law in any case).

Just because v = D / t doesn't mean that all predictions based on Newton's law of motion are tautologies.

-- only energy balance matters (here comes the school of people saying that the system is trivially simple because it exchanges energy only by radiation)-- only «equilibrium» matters (here comes the school of people who compare the system to a small ball slightly moved away from its equilibrium position inside a spherical bowl)-- space doesn't matter (this is a tautology because if a 3D system can be reduced to 1D and still predicted, then the «neglected» 2 D obviously didn't matter)-- from the above follows also necessarily that everything that happens in the real 3D world can only be noise (here comes the school of people who say that everything averages out)

Does this not reduce Bayesian estimates to tautology?

The rest is a virtual tautology (what those policies might do and how acceptable the consequences is another question).

You have dismissed the role of feedback entirely and, in doing so, are insisting on a tautology for how your system so constrained will behave.