Sentences with phrase «tax dollars at»

Your tax dollars at work.

By: Saul Templeton PDF Version: Trinity Western University: Policing Gender and Requiring LGBTQI + People to Pay for It This post is a follow - up to my previous post, Trinity Western University: Your Tax Dollars at Work.

Your tax dollars at work: Professor Shukla and his daughter visit the thermometers at Gandhi Degree College in India.

My tax dollars at work.

Our government tax dollars at work.

Your neighbors» tax dollars at work.

Let's get serious about our public schools, and stop throwing tax dollars at what doesn't work — private tuition subsidies.»

There are also pieces of the gold furniture series to collect for the truly affluent among you — your furry residents» tax dollars at work.

Says Colorado congressional candidate Morgan Carroll «voted to allow welfare recipients to use your tax dollars at ATMs at strip clubs and pot dispensaries.»

Your tax dollars at work.

1) Harry Wilson wasn't being paid for with my tax dollars at Silverpoint — DiNapoli is, so if he enriches himself and certain people get special access, it's my business as a tax payer.

«But career politicians like Senator Oppenheimer always find it easier to throw more tax dollars at their problems — even as they become more and more scarce.

That would be real campaign finance reform, instead of throwing tax dollars at politicians.»

This is an assessment from our intelligence agencies, no less... your tax dollars at work.

Progress can't always be made with chit chats at starbucks and throwing tax dollars at problems.

No government support went to the construction of the National Cathedral, no tax dollars at all... all private donations.

Not exact matches

Look for more money to be given to the Canada Revenue Agency to fight offshore tax evasion, an investment that has so far helped the CRA reap millions in extra tax dollars while at the same time achieving the aim of discouraging tax evasion by Canadians.

Cut the cost of health - care premiums by buying insurance online at HealthCare.gov to qualify for a tax credit worth thousands of dollars.

«Say you're at that 24 to 25 percent tax bracket, all those dollars belong to you,» said Dan Yu, managing principal of EisnerAmper Wealth Advisors in New York.

On top of that, the tech giants are staring at a drop in corporate taxes starting in 2018, and they can bring some of the many billions of dollars they have stashed overseas back to the U.S. at a dramatically reduced tax rate.

For residents in 26 states and in D.C., the combination of state and federal taxes take at least one in five dollars they earn over the course of the year.

Justin Fox at Bloomberg likewise finds Tillerson's deal «entirely reasonable,» while Lynnley Browning at the same news organization quotes experts calling it a «72 million dollar tax advantage.»

«If folks» taxes go back up, and the middle - class family is looking at two to three thousand dollars in additional taxes, those are the margins in dollars that really make a huge difference in our industry,» said Rowen.

INVESTORS are putting at risk millions of dollars by not carefully checking the viability of tax benefits of investment schemes before pouring in their hard earned money.

The president is also expected to host governors and mayors at the White House Thursday for a listening session focused on the efficient use of tax dollars for infrastructure projects.

They found the federal treasury lost at least half a billion dollars in tax revenue that would have been paid had individuals not been able to funnel their personal income through corporations.

That's 24 % greater than if she had started collecting benefits at 62.2 (Note: All figures are in today's dollars and before tax; the actual benefit would be adjusted for inflation and would possibly be subject to income tax.)

Peter Kent: Carbon pricing in any form is a carbon tax, because to be a realistic dollar figure, it would get Canadians at the gas pump for example, and right across the economy, but at the gas pump, it would get us to where Europeans are.

The «real - world» bonus here is that those who invest the «same dollar amount» into a Roth IRA vs traditional will in fact be investing at a higher level, due to the higher amount needed to overcome the after - tax hit.

Through loan guarantees, government investment or other subsidies, Ottawa and Alberta can try to keep the project afloat with your tax dollars — beyond the point at which the market would otherwise kill it.

However, workers, suppliers and landlords expect to be paid in dollars, and the IRS will require dollars at tax time for income earned through barter.

1) not at the top tax bracket yet, thus less expensive to have taxable dollars; 2) before 35, generally significant expenses such as house purchase, engagement ring, wedding, etc.; 3) keep liquidity for potential opportunities — «cash is king»; 4) use after - tax dollars to buy RE and rent it out for another stream of passive income, which is generally not taxable due to depreciation — could be a retirement vehicle in itself.

In the end, to keep the ad dollars at home in order to sustain local broadcasting, the Canadian government disallowed tax deductibility for advertising placed by Canadian firms on non-Canadian stations.

It is even easier to argue that tax credits should be targeted at those who most need the assistance and that the wealthy don't need an extra few thousand dollars.

Still, we might reasonably look askance at a company that works so assiduously to squeeze every last dollar out of the tax system.

We are at a classic tipping point when it comes to the secret squandering of Canadian tax dollars.

The economists argue that even if such a tax was levied at just 0.05 %, it could raise hundreds of billions of dollars, which could be ploughed into development projects.

Allow trillions of dollars of American corporate money overseas to be brought back at a 10 % tax rate

I have no debt and I max out my Roth IRA, put at least 200 dollars into a 403b account (tax deferred) and I also have taxable accounts... how do you do it?

For example, if you have a million dollars in your taxable account, and that has a cost basis of a million dollars, you can take 1 dollar out of there and all zero taxes, whereas if you have another million dollars in your 401k and you're being taxed at 20 % marginal tax rates, that's only worth 80 cents.

If Sid were to grow his $ 549,000 RRSP at three per cent per year after inflation and were to spend all capital and income starting at 65 in the 25 years to age 90, he could withdraw $ 31,528 per year in 2018 dollars before tax.

Trump's tax cut allowed for the repartition of US dollars held overseas by American corporations back home at a reduced rate.

Contributing with pretax dollars (traditional IRA, 401 (k)-RRB- allows you to reduce your taxable income by deferring income taxes until retirement, at which point you're more likely to be in a lower tax bracket.

American multinationals like Apple can legally dodge tens of billions of dollars in taxes each year by parking costs at home while moving profits abroad.

Bond and currency markets have not embraced tax reform to nearly the same degree and in the case of the dollar, apparently not at all.

Are the billions of dollars of «earnings» reported by Wall Street speculators to be taxed at the low 15 % «capital gains» rate?

Basically, it reads like a evolved bait & switch tactic similar to retail stores throwing a guilt trip at the cashier line to get another dollar or two from your total grocery bill (look this up — these corporate grocers / retailers use this to get a huge tax credit).

And if you literally mean a flat tax with from the first dollar (which is * NOT * what most flat tax proposals are, by the way — they all include at least a significant standard deduction)-- one with no deductions & credits (not even home interest deductions or charitable deductions or college deductions, etc), then we may as well be discussing what type of pig would fly more efficiently.

«We pay all the taxes we owe, every single dollar,» Mr. Cook declared at the hearing.

This begs the question: Why are tax dollars being spent on expensive emergency shelters when we know they are ineffective at combatting homelessness and addiction?