Sentences with phrase «tax law gives»

The new tax law gives more people a reason to risk it.

Saying that the federal tax law gives health insurers a 40 % cut on their corporate taxes while transferring health care costs to the state, the budget would impose a 14 % tax on health insurer gains.

In addition to the lower tax rate mentioned above, the new tax law gives GOOGL the opportunity to repatriate some of its $ 100 + billion in excess cash at a lower 15.5 % rate.

CHICAGO, Feb 16 - U.S. agricultural merchants are scrambling to register themselves as cooperatives after a blunder in the country's new tax law gave farmers a tax break for selling grains to co-ops rather than private firms.

Net income will be between $ 140 million and $ 240 million, the company said, with the new tax law giving the company a benefit of roughly $ 445 million to $ 495 million.

Prudential had sought to extend privilege to advice on tax law given by accountants, thus allowing it to withhold that advice from bodies such as HMRC.

Prudential sought to argue that LPP should be available for advice on tax law given by accountants, and that the determining factor for the application of LPP should be the function of the adviser, ie advising on the law rather than the status of the adviser, ie whether or not a lawyer.

Not exact matches

But taxpayers would, the argument goes, be allowed to fully deduct the amount on their federal tax returns because the new law still allows most charitable giving to be deducted for federal tax purposes.

Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personntax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personntax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnTax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.

And given what's going on in Washington, we may be at these tax rates and under current law for a while.

The policy as it stands today provides relief to working parents by giving them a non-refundable tax credit of up to $ 1,000 annually, and it has had bipartisan support since it became law in 1997.

In a lengthy statement given to the ICIJ, a spokesperson insists that the Prime Minister and Palsdottir had «adhered to Icelandic law» and properly disclosed their financial interests to the tax authorities.

The advice we provide is given in accordance with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, including proper disclosure to tax authorities, and adheres to the highest professional standards.»

Then you say, «This is the tax result we expect, given our interpretation of the tax laws.»

Given the new tax laws, it wouldn't make sense for a company to start out as an S corporation right now.»

Given all the changes, the new tax law exacerbates the need for you to do your financial planning now rather than later.

We still rate the Utilities sector as Unattractive, and only three Utilities stocks earn our Attractive - or - better rating, but the new tax law does give a tangible benefit to the sector that the market doesn't seem to be factoring in to its valuation.

To U.S. - based multinationals with effective tax rates below 13 %: Will you be able to maintain your current tax rate given the law's new minimum tax of roughly 13 %?

«Given that tax obligations for digital financial assets and associated investments are not included in the law..., the government views as essential the need to make corresponding changes... regarding taxation and collection,» the summary reads.

I anticipated some type of detrimental tax law to pass given San Francisco is a sanctuary city in a blue state.

Yet when giving away goods, be mindful of tax laws.

Like other economists, Zandi questioned the timing of the tax law and spending hikes given the health of the economy.

Voya's Mike Berry offer tips on the unique savings offerings many consumers now have given an increase in their take - home pay under the new tax law.

Dimon said new federal tax law and «a more constructive regulatory environment» adopted since the 2016 presidential election give him hope that JPMorgan will be able to invest more of its excess capital to grow the bank and expand into new markets.

On any given day, he may or may not express the policy views associated with the American right — he will muse about raising taxes on hedge funds, or passing gun control into law, or slapping deep tariffs on foreign steel.

Dozens of companies have announced they are giving their employees bonuses, following the passage of the Republican tax plan that Trump signed into law in December.

There was some interest in tax reform among labor law experts in light of the New York Times article that ran on December 9, titled «Tax Plans May Give Your Co-Worker a Better Deal Than You.&raqtax reform among labor law experts in light of the New York Times article that ran on December 9, titled «Tax Plans May Give Your Co-Worker a Better Deal Than You.&raqTax Plans May Give Your Co-Worker a Better Deal Than You.»

On Friday, Donald Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act into law, a $ 1.5 trillion proposal that gives corporations a massive permanent tax break, temporarily cuts rates for individuals, and repeals the Affordable Care Act's individual mandate — a move that is estimated to leave 13 million fewer insured in the next 10 yeaTax Cuts and Jobs Act into law, a $ 1.5 trillion proposal that gives corporations a massive permanent tax break, temporarily cuts rates for individuals, and repeals the Affordable Care Act's individual mandate — a move that is estimated to leave 13 million fewer insured in the next 10 yeatax break, temporarily cuts rates for individuals, and repeals the Affordable Care Act's individual mandate — a move that is estimated to leave 13 million fewer insured in the next 10 years.

In order to allow tax reform legislation that reduces revenues through reconciliation, the budget resolution would have to set a revenue level below current law and give the Ways and Means Committee instructions to reduce revenues.

If an organization is tax payer funded then it can not discriminate under the law, the University is just enforcing that within its own borders given that its «taxpayers» are the students.

This is why churches are given privileges under non-profit laws and we are not allowed to scrutinize their books and tax them.

If we had given the industrial Barron's more tax breaks and less regulation and removed OSHA or removed minimum wage laws we would be living in far worse financial internment camps always owing far more to the Company than we can ever repay just to survive which is what the end result of unbridled capitalism leads.

!!!! The more freedom we give those Muslims by letting them wearing their scary Islamic clothes, opening mosques (paying no tax), shoveling their evil religion in our throats, wanting Sharia Laws, etc. — the more problems will be caused!!!!!!!! Most Muslims are extremists, and even «moderate» Muslims still support them, so we should NOT tolerate them and we should BAN Islam unless they allow other religious minority in their countries to live in peace!!!!!

They suggested three ways in which RFRA might conceivably be interpreted (misinterpreted, really) to create bad consequences: (1) to give a church's opponents legal «standing» (a technical term meaning the right to sue) to challenge the church's tax - exempt status; (2) to allow taxpayers to claim their free exercise rights would be violated if a religiously affiliated organization receives government assistance under a secular program; and, most importantly, (3) to allow pro-abortion plaintiffs to claim a free exercise right to abortion if Roe v. Wade is overruled and states enact anti-abortion laws.

IRS doesn't even follow tax law, and Fed takes trillions every year through income taxes, and gives it away as «interest» to foreign banks.

Ron Paul is right, MYOB, the problem is the Fed laws from FDR that defined marriage and gave tax breaks to married couple to fund the ponzi of ss by having children.

While there is freedom of religion, we aren't obligated to give them tax exempt status and allow them to violate our laws.

Rather than talking about marginal tax rates — which few people fully understand — savvy politicians should support a law that would state that no citizen can be compelled to give more than half of his annual income to any government entity.

He attempted to enforce clerical celibacy, forbade pluralism, (the holding of two or more church offices and drawing the income from them), endeavored to exclude lay interference in ecclesiastical affairs, affirmed the right of Rome to review important cases under canon law and thus increased appeals to the Holy See, ordered that tithes for the support of the Church be given precedence over all other taxes, and took vigorous measures for the suppression of heresy.

It also requires laws and other actions by government to make incentives universally available through tax deductions; dollars given to recognized philanthropies are not taxable.

According to DeWine, the Crew uses tax - funded support, and is therefore subject to a law that would force Precourt to give six months notice on relocation and to accept a reasonable offer from a local bidder.

«The government should admit that it was a mistake to have changed the law to take away the former provisions giving automatic council tax exemptions when properties are empty and require repairs to make them habitable in cases of flooding.»

Benefits have been capped, teachers given power to discipline yob pupils, a military covenant has been enshrined in law, council tax frozen, and the Right to Buy is back.

He also argued that the erstwhile Kufuor government did not breach the law in giving tax rebates to the company.

The Republican tax law passed last fall will give the richest 1 percent of Americans an average personal income tax break of about $ 33,000, while the poorest Americans will receive an average personal income tax break of $ 40, according to a new study published this week by nonpartisan analysts.

As long as Cuomo's cap stays in place, it will continue bending the property - tax curve lower — especially in school districts, where the law gives a simple majority of voters the power to absolutely freeze tax levies at prior - year levels.

Third Question: Who will give a public apology to all the New York tax payers who will ultimately be the payee on this multi-million dollar law suit sure to be won, and deservedly so by this victimized young man?

In November 2015, former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver was convicted of 7 felony counts of federal corruption charges in a kick - back scheme where he gave $ 500,000 in state lump sum tax dollars to a physician who would refer patients to the Speaker's law firm where he would get referral fees.

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Tax Law Section 1432 and General Municipal Law, Section 6 - d, the Erie County Legislature will hold a Public Hearing on Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 6:00 p.m. in the Chambers of the Erie County Legislature, located at 92 Franklin St., 4th Floor, Old County Hall, Buffalo, N.Y.

Rather than give the money to the law firm that employed Ambrosino, he took the money for himself and then didn't pay taxes on it.