Here, in theory, is how a state budget official and
tax policy professors said it could work: An employee and an employer would have to agree to lower an employee's annual wage by the amount that employee would normally pay in state income tax.
Not exact matches
But economists and
professors cast doubt on whether
tax policy changes were the driving force behind the move by a retailing giant that for years has stood as a lightning rod for criticism over low worker pay.
NYU
tax law
professor Daniel Shaviro has referred to the pass - through break as «New Plutocratic Industrial
Policy,» a provision that benefits the rich and specific companies for no justifiable economic reason.
In tape - recorded conversations, Miller engages liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, big spenders and
tax - cutters, politicians,
professors and
policy specialists — separately and together — in reflection on his proposals, eliciting more or less agreement with this or that plan.
Mitchell Kane, a
professor of
tax policy at NYU Law School, said courts have basically shut down constitutional challenges to federal
tax legislation on grounds of differential treatment across citizens, absent discrimination based on some protected class.
«This is states engaging in self - help,» said David Kamin, a
professor at New York University School of Law who studies budget and
tax policy.
Professor Kim analyzed changes in
tax policy based on detailed proposals by Donald Trump and Senator Bernie Sanders during the 2016 US Presidential campaign.
At this critical time of
tax reform, widening gaps between the rich and poor and growing public support for higher
taxes and redistribution to combat inequality, policymakers should consider joint federal
tax and redistributive
policies to reduce the burden of mortality among Americans,» said
Professor Kim.
For one thing, there is the baggage associated with the National Energy Program backed by his father decades ago that
taxed oil and created a lot of bad blood with Alberta, said Barry Rabe, a
professor of public
policy at the University of Michigan and Wilson Center
policy scholar.
«In light of the predictions of the proponents of the
tax, as well as in light of the previous research, we expected to see the
tax fully passed through to consumers,» said Cawley,
professor of
policy analysis and management and of economics in Cornell's College of Human Ecology.
«Similar alcohol
tax increases implemented across the country could prevent thousands of deaths from car crashes each year,» said Alexander C. Wagenaar, Ph.D., a
professor in the department of health outcomes and
policy at the UF College of Medicine.
Prof. Joost Pauwelyn, a law
professor at Duke University subsequently published U.S. Federal Climate
Policy and Competitiveness Concerns: The Limits and Options of International Trade Law, which holds out strong hope that border
tax adjustments could pass muster under WTO and GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs & Trades) rules.
«Our approach is a different way to think about cigarette
taxes,» says senior author Matthew M. Davis, M.D., M.A.P.P.,
professor of Pediatrics at U-M's C.S. Mott Children's Hospital and who is with U-M's schools of public health and public
policy and the U-M Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innov
policy and the U-M Institute for Healthcare
Policy and Innov
Policy and Innovation.
As for the research on competitive effects of school choice
policies in general — vouchers,
tax - credit scholarships, and charters all together — the jury is still out, said David Arsen, a
professor of education
policy and K - 12 educational administration at Michigan State University.
Goulder is a
professor of environmental and resource economics at Stanford University, is a University Fellow with Resources for the Future, and was one of the pioneers in the study of the interaction between
tax and environmental
policy.
The difference between
Professor Nordhaus's optimal carbon
tax policy and a fifty - year delay
policy is insignificant economically or climatologically in view of major uncertainties in (1) future economic growth (including reductions in carbon emissions intensity); (2) the physical science (e.g., the climate sensitivity); (3) future positive and negative environmental impacts (e.g., the economic «damage function»); (4) the evaluation of long - term economic costs and benefits (e.g., the discount rate); and (5) the international political process (e.g., the impact of less than full participation).
We are not the first to note that
Professor Nordhaus's optimal carbon
tax is hardly distinguishable from a
policy of delay.
As University of Denver law
professor Sam Kamin advised the parliamentary committee, «The more different and innovative approaches the provinces take — from distributing cannabis themselves, to regulating and
taxing it, to prohibiting distribution entirely — the more we will learn about the impact of regulatory
policy on important outcome metrics.»
Professor Katz has published or forthcoming work in a wide variety of academic outlets, including the Emory Law Journal, Ohio State Law Journal, Iowa Law Review, Illinois Law Review, Virginia
Tax Review, Cornell Journal of Law & Public
Policy, Journal of Law & Politics, Journal of Legal Education, Artificial Intelligence & Law, and Physica A.
Pathology and radiology companies receive significant public funding and make sizeable profits while often paying relatively little
tax, according to health
policy analyst
Professor Peter Br... Read more
«The foreign buyer
tax will have helped, and there is zero doubt about that,» says Joshua Gordon, public
policy professor at Simon Fraser University and a
tax supporter.