We improve lives through
tax policy research and education that leads to greater economic growth and opportunity.
The organization supports
tax policy research and studies and comments on matters affecting the U.S. tax system.
We improve lives through
tax policy research and education that leads to greater economic growth and opportunity.
The Tax Foundation is the nation's leading independent
tax policy research organization.
Not exact matches
The U.S. has taken a number of
policy approaches aimed at increasing the country's innovation output, from boosting STEM education programs to offering
tax incentives on R&D
research.
In a new paper published by the National Bureau of Economic
Research, the economists Gregori Galofré - Vilà, Christopher M. Meissner, Martin McKee, and David Stuckler show the dramatic impact poor
tax policy had on Weimar Germany from 1930 to 1932.
Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and
research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade
policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade
policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in
tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personn
tax (including U.S.
tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personn
tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personn
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.
«It is a significant amount of income for a low - income family... losing that will definitely affect families,» Elaine Maag, a senior
research associate at the non-partisan
Tax Policy Center, told Business Insider.
A new study from the National Bureau of Economic
Research has found that
tax policy has a dramatic impact on businesses and, if raised too high, could drive consumers to the black market.
Elaine Maag, a senior
research associate at the
Tax Policy Center, thinks that Ivanka's position likely changed as she became more educated on the issue and realized that the child tax credit reaches many more families than a child care credit cou
Tax Policy Center, thinks that Ivanka's position likely changed as she became more educated on the issue and realized that the child
tax credit reaches many more families than a child care credit cou
tax credit reaches many more families than a child care credit could.
Separately, some Republican senators were questioning the repeal of a 40 percent inheritance
tax levied on estates worth more than $ 5.5 million, or $ 11 million for married couples — a
tax paid only by the wealthiest American taxpayers, or about 0.2 percent of Americans, according to the Center on Budget and
Policy Priorities, a research and policy inst
Policy Priorities, a
research and
policy inst
policy institute.
Senator Ron Wyden, the top Senate Democrat on
tax policy, accused the Trump administration on Tuesday of removing a
research paper from the U.S. Treasury's website that showed workers would benefit only marginally from a corporate rate cut.
The cost of the credits to the federal government makes them controversial, however, says Joseph Rosenberg, senior
research associate at the
Tax Policy Center, a non-partisan tax group run by the Urban Institute and Brookin
Tax Policy Center, a non-partisan
tax group run by the Urban Institute and Brookin
tax group run by the Urban Institute and Brookings.
Since 1937, our principled
research, insightful analysis, and engaged experts have informed smarter
tax policy at the federal, state, and local levels.
Fostering innovation in the Canadian economy requires bringing a pro-innovation lens to a broad suite of
policies that go well beyond the mainstay of providing businesses with
research and development
tax credits.
Canada's strengths — and there are many — seem to be overshadowed by relatively low performance in many
policy areas that likely influence innovation, ranging from access to markets and competitive environment, to regulation,
taxes, intellectual property rights, and governments» own often diffuse support for
research and development.
June 16, 2016 Comparing the administration of the Canadian Scientific
Research and Experimental Development (SR&ED)
tax credit program to the UK R&D
tax credit program: Public
Policy Advocacy validated
Richard Murphy for
Tax Research UK: The UK's tax policy should be rebalanced so multinationals can't get away tax - free while small businesses strug
Tax Research UK: The UK's
tax policy should be rebalanced so multinationals can't get away tax - free while small businesses strug
tax policy should be rebalanced so multinationals can't get away
tax - free while small businesses strug
tax - free while small businesses struggle
This area covers the impact of regulatory and other
policies, such as
taxes and subsidies and competition
policy, on specific economic sectors (except those covered by the Institute's natural resources or financial services
research), on consumers, and on the overall state of competition in Canada.
Chaired by Michael Horgan, the C.D. Howe Institute's Fiscal and
Tax Competitiveness Council oversees research and development of policy recommendations to foster effective and efficient spending and tax programs, and ensures that Canadian fiscal policy supports economic dynamism and sustainable income grow
Tax Competitiveness Council oversees
research and development of
policy recommendations to foster effective and efficient spending and
tax programs, and ensures that Canadian fiscal policy supports economic dynamism and sustainable income grow
tax programs, and ensures that Canadian fiscal
policy supports economic dynamism and sustainable income growth.
By shifting the money under the new terms, Apple has saved $ 43 billion in
taxes, more than any other American company, according to the Institute on Taxation and Economic
Policy, a
research group in Washington.
Analysts also believe that tech companies are likely to be some of the top beneficiaries of Trump's proposed
policies, especially
tax reform.Cisco is likely to be a top beneficiary of lowered
taxes on the repatriation of foreign cash, according to
research from Strategas Research P
research from Strategas
Research P
Research Partners.
In a recent report from Morgan Stanley
Research, Zezas and the firm's economists and market strategists examined the potential effects of the new
tax policy now that the bill has passed.
About one - third of
tax filers currently itemize, according to the Tax Policy Center, a nonpartisan research group based in Washingt
tax filers currently itemize, according to the
Tax Policy Center, a nonpartisan research group based in Washingt
Tax Policy Center, a nonpartisan
research group based in Washington.
«Essentially, the market is giving full credit for
tax benefit pass - through in consensus numbers, but based on a thorough review of company guidance, we think this may be inappropriate,» says Todd Castagno, Accounting & Tax Policy Analyst for Morgan Stanley Resear
tax benefit pass - through in consensus numbers, but based on a thorough review of company guidance, we think this may be inappropriate,» says Todd Castagno, Accounting &
Tax Policy Analyst for Morgan Stanley Resear
Tax Policy Analyst for Morgan Stanley
Research.
«We should be seeing some serious upticks in orders if the
tax cut is going to lead to the promised jump in investment,» Dean Baker, an economist from the liberal - leaning Center for Economic and
Policy Research, said in an email.
«The
tax plan is just the latest in a long line of really bad economic
policies that are based on an idea of how corporations work that has nothing to do with how corporations actually work today,» Nell Abernathy, vice president of
research and
policy at the liberal - leaning think tank the Roosevelt Institute, told me.
Rhys Kesselman is Canada
Research Chair in public finance with the School of Public
Policy, Simon Fraser University, and author of an award - winning book on payroll
taxes.
But much of the
research conducted thus far suggests otherwise; the Center on Budget and
Policy Priorities, for instance, recently concluded that workers would receive a maximum of only a quarter of the benefits from
tax cuts; and even then, it is most likely to be the higher earners that would be the biggest beneficiaries.
Responding to
research from the Consumers Health Forum, the Heart Foundation, the Obesity
Policy Coalition and the Public Health Association of Australia, the Council's CEO Geoff Parker said better education around diet and lifestyle, not
taxes, is a far better and more commonsense approach for a healthier country.
This toolkit, to be released in 2016, will bring together lessons from our
research and
policy work in date labeling,
tax incentives, liability protections, as well as other food waste
policies, to provide
policy makers with a comprehensive menu of
policy options.
EJ McMahon, the
research director for the Empire Center of Public
Policy, joined Poozer Politics to explain the politics, policy and personalities behind the 1995 ta
Policy, joined Poozer Politics to explain the politics,
policy and personalities behind the 1995 ta
policy and personalities behind the 1995
tax cut.
A recent
research project by Kayte Lawton and myself for the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), funded by the Nuffield Foundation, attempts to inform debate by providing a critical assessment of the options for reforming wealth taxes in
research project by Kayte Lawton and myself for the Institute for Public
Policy Research (IPPR), funded by the Nuffield Foundation, attempts to inform debate by providing a critical assessment of the options for reforming wealth taxes in
Research (IPPR), funded by the Nuffield Foundation, attempts to inform debate by providing a critical assessment of the options for reforming wealth
taxes in the UK.
The left - leaning Institute for Public
Policy Research (IPPR) argued that although the localism agenda was promising, it will be largely meaningless unless the coalition delivers «real powers with new funding streams that give local people more control over how their
taxes are spent».
Meanwhile a
research and data report from the Empire Center for Public
Policy, which describes itself as «an independent, non-partisan, non-profit think tank based in Albany, New York,» found that since the
tax cap went into effect, school
tax levies have risen by an average of just 2.2 percent annually — the lowest in any four - year period since 1982.
The Institute for
Policy Research also provides funding for Migration Watch, the
Tax Payer's Alliance and other right - wing lobbying groups.
«This governor has fancied himself as a sort of fiscal hawk but willing to deal with other issues from a more moderate or liberal perspective,» said Blair Horner, the executive director of New York Public Interest
Research Group, citing Mr. Cuomo's conservative - minded moves, like the property
tax cap, and his more progressive
policies, like same - sex marriage.
A study by the
Tax Foundation, an independent tax - policy research group, shows
Tax Foundation, an independent
tax - policy research group, shows
tax -
policy research group, shows...
(Closing that loophole in the city's unincorporated business
tax alone could bring roughly $ 200 million into city coffers, according to the Fiscal
Policy Institute, a
research group.)
The Pataki Commission can only justify this giveaway by totally ignoring
research by the State's
tax policy experts who, in the Department of Taxation and Finance's recent report on the estate
tax, concluded that «Migration studies regarding the impact of
taxes such as the estate
tax have shown that
taxes generally are not a major factor in the decision of where to live or retire.»
Tony Dolphin, senior economist at the Institute for Public
Policy Research thinktank, called for ministers to use the
tax system to boost the economy in the short - term.
The county executive pointed to a study by E.J. McMahon, founder and
research director for the conservative Empire Center for Public
Policy, who has said housing values in the state could decline by up to 20 percent if fewer people are unable to afford more expensive homes and instead put money toward
taxes.
E.J. McMahon,
research director for Empire Center for Public
Policy, said he believes the debate over the millionaires»
tax has gained the most attention out of the executive budget.
It is a little late, therefore, for the think - tanks of the Labour establishment, the Fabian Society and the Institute for Public
Policy Research (IPPR), to publish their proposals for higher
taxes on the better - off.
New York (CNNMoney.com)- Some U.S. states facing steep budget gaps have resorted to
tax policies that could be harmful over the long term, a non-profit
research group said Monday.
This year — with such blockbuster issues as jobs, Iraq, domestic security,
taxes, and the rising cost of health care — is different only to the extent that President George W. Bush's stem cell
research policies have made headlines.
That means the fate of these and other
research programs, although traditionally nonpartisan, will be shaped by larger forces — from Social Security to
tax policy — stirring the political waters.
In my judgment, that kind of leadership will require a comprehensive and sustained effort from both our public and private sectors — including a robust investment in education (especially the STEM fields), a federal commitment to
research and development, a renewed emphasis on next generation manufacturing, translating federally funded breakthroughs to commercial applications in the private sector, an immigration
policy that enables us to recruit and retain the best and brightest scientists from around the world, and appropriate
tax, regulatory, and legal
policy.
Capping some 30 years of comparative
research, Wilensky addresses the question of what
taxing, spending, and public
policies mean for the well - being of people.
Brownson, who also is director of the university's Prevention
Research Center, and his co-authors set out to determine the effectiveness of three federal
policies aimed at reducing childhood obesity: afterschool physical activity programs, a one - tenth - cent per ounce sugar - sweetened beverage excise
tax, and a ban on fast food television advertising to children under 12.