Income earned on that money would be
taxed in the hands of the child.
Withdrawals while the child attends post secondary schooling are
taxed in the hands of the child, which is advantageous because their income is likely low while attending school and therefore their marginal rate is low
For tax characteristics it's right up there with the TFSA & RRSP since not only is it tax deferred it is also
taxed in the hands of your child who will probably be in a much lower tax bracket.
Secondary income, or income earned on income from investments in the trust, will be
taxed in the hands of the child.
Not exact matches
For example, a Heritage Foundation document titled «Time to Repeal Federal Death
Taxes: The Nightmare
of the American Dream» emphasizes stories that rarely, if ever, happen
in real life: «Small - business owners, particularly minority owners, suffer anxious moments wondering whether the businesses they hope to
hand down to their
children will be destroyed by the death
tax bill,... Women whose
children are grown struggle to find ways to re-enter the work force without upsetting the family's estate
tax avoidance plan.»
One way forward for simplification and increases
in the productivity
of the federal investment is to make social programs intended to support lower income families with
children more like
tax expenditures — putting more money directly
in the
hands of parents to spend on the care and development
of their
children and less money directly
in the financial accounts
of states, welfare agencies, and social service providers.
The State Department
of Education,
in collusion with non-educator administrators such as Steven Adamowski, have
handed Achievement First millions
in public
tax payer dollars to experiment on
children from poor families.
Actually that should be «may» not compensate and certainly won't if the
child does not go on to post-secondary education and then the amount
in excess
of contribution and CESG (which must be returned) is fully
taxed in the contributor's
hands.
In this case, putting your adult child on as co-owner of your home could convert some tax - free capital gains (in your hands) into taxable capital gains (in your child's hands
In this case, putting your adult
child on as co-owner
of your home could convert some
tax - free capital gains (
in your hands) into taxable capital gains (in your child's hands
in your
hands) into taxable capital gains (
in your child's hands
in your
child's
hands).
Because
of this, I thought it might actually be a * good * thing to hedge some funds that would be invested
in trust with my
children's CCTB / UCCB contributions so the interest is
taxed in the kid's
hands instead
of mine...
For example, a super benefit may pass to a spouse
tax - free but may be taxable
in the
hands of adult
children.
If the
child is not eligible to receive payments from an RESP which would be the case if they quit school then the non-contribution payments are
taxed in the
hands of the subscriber (account owner) along with a 20 % penalty.
In an effort to reduce U.S. estate
tax, many Canadians will transfer U.S. investments, such as property or stock, into the
hands of family members, such as adult -
children.
Child Support is not
taxed as income
in the
hands of the Recipient, nor is it deductible by the Payer.