Not exact matches
Growth in several
tax revenue sources, such as volume - based fuel and
gasoline taxes, is more closely aligned to the real economy (that is, real GDP)
than the nominal economy.
The country would be spending billions in loans,
tax incentives and price guarantees to lock in a technology that produces more greenhouse gases
than gasoline does.
Davis, the University of California professor, argued that for fuel use to drop,
taxes on
gasoline and other fuels need to rise more
than 10 cents.
Experts recommend you spend no more
than 15 percent of your total monthly budget on all of your automotive expenses — including licenses, fees,
taxes, insurance, maintenance and
gasoline.
Now that diesel fuel is unusually expensive (hit much harder
than gasoline, in % terms since 2002, in either Europe or the US), roads near markets are more crowded, and (hopefully, IMHO) a carbon
tax is near, the competitive advantages that are opened by cheap transportation will sour in some cases, but continue in others.
I think that, particularly with presidential leadership, there could be more
than 60 Democrats and Republicans in the Senate who could get behind the case for fueling an American energy quest this way, or with a directed 2 - cent - per - gallon nudge to the
gasoline tax, which alone would triple our research budget compared to the pre-stimulus level.
• The RFS is a de facto
tax on motorists because it requires them to consume ethanol, which, on an energy - equivalent basis, is significantly more expensive
than gasoline.
Incomes tend to be much lower in farming areas
than in cities, and this has made the government wary of raising
taxes sharply on
gasoline and diesel, even though steep fuel
taxes might limit consumption.
The average U.S. gas
tax of 47 cents per gallon, scarcely one tenth that in Europe, helps explain why more
gasoline is used in the United States
than in the next 20 countries combined.
Consumers would get a $ 7,000
tax credit for buying the vehicles, which will likely be significantly more expensive
than traditional,
gasoline - powered cars.
More
than 90 % of people say they could handle paying an extra 36 - cent
tax on each gallon of
gasoline without feeling financially stressed.
Therefore it is only just that those who profit from the sale of petroleum and coal be
taxed (a «carbon
tax», which sounds less direct
than, say, a
gasoline tax, or a home - heating oil
tax) with the proceeds of the
tax to be paid back to citizens in various ways.
First, a fuel economy standard is shown to be at least six to fourteen times less cost effective
than a price instrument (fuel
tax) when targeting an identical reduction in cumulative
gasoline use.
It baffles me that President Bush would rather go to Saudi Arabia twice in four months and beg the Saudi king for an oil price break
than ask the American people to drive 55 miles an hour, buy more fuel - efficient cars or accept a carbon
tax or
gasoline tax that might actually help free us from what he called our «addiction to oil.»
Although this and some other pronouncements by Mankiw concern
gasoline taxes rather
than carbon
taxes, they could be considered bold by a close adviser to the Romney for President campaign.
I will tell the American people that a higher
tax on
gasoline is better at encouraging conservation
than are heavy - handed CAFE regulations.
MA at 396:» I submit that when the costs of AGW are internalized via a carbon
tax, the higher price of
gasoline will persuade more Hummer drivers to trade them for Priuses (or bicycles, if the price of gas goes high enough)
than public shaming will.»
Within the transportation sector, the environmental damages per unit of fuel consumption are $ 3.80 (− 1.80 / +2.10) per gallon of
gasoline using a 3 % discount rate, far larger
than the current federal
tax of $ 0.184 per gallon and more
than 7x greater
than the typical combined local, state and federal
gasoline tax (additional negative externalities associated with
gasoline use should be part of an optimal fuel
tax).
Ian W.H. Parry (2005), Is Pay - As - You - Drive Insurance a Better Way to Reduce
Gasoline than Gasoline Taxes?
One of them, commissioned by the Brookings Institute, suggests that adoption of this insurance model across the country could reduce driving by up to 8 % — more
than a $ 1 - a-gallon
gasoline tax, which would go a long way toward reducing U.S. dependence on foreign oil supplies.