«progressive» = lots of revenue & spending in a good economy, then lots of progam cuts and a call for higher
taxes in a bad economy when the revenue collapes.
Not exact matches
«You know I think the way we deal with the
tax bill is by being honest about it, saying across time the very significant
tax reductions for groups and parts of our
economy that really weren't needed will hurt the fiscal condition of the country and put us
in a
bad position as it relates to other priorities we have,» Delaney said.
«
Taxing everything from health insurance to soft drinks to clothing will make life much harder on employers trying to retain and create jobs, and on working New Yorkers trying to make ends meet
in this
bad economy,» said Kenneth Adams, president and CEO of The Business Council.
Accordingly, they decisively favour a description of Plan A: «borrowing more will make matters
worse... we have to bring the debt and the deficit under control even if it has some painful effects for the
economy in the short term» over Plan B: «the government's spending cuts and
tax rises are hurting the
economy.
Hundreds of millions
in new
tax breaks for big companies and Wall Street won't help New York's
economy, but it will make our worst - in - the - nation inequality even worse,» said Michael Kink of Strong Economy f
economy, but it will make our
worst -
in - the - nation inequality even
worse,» said Michael Kink of Strong
Economy f
Economy for All.
«Mr. Silver's high
taxes and job - killing government regulations have
badly damaged a robust
economy in the Hudson Valley that sustained generations of my family before me.
If you want to stabilize the cash flow
in New York from huge deficits, you need to make a REGRESSIVE
tax code, so that when the
economy hits
bad times, the number of taxpayers increase to compensate for the loss at the other end.
Sagging
tax revenues and growing health - care costs have pummeled state
economies so relentlessly that states are
in their
worst fiscal situation since World War II, a sobering new report from the nation's governors and state budget chiefs declares.
Pros: Excellent
economy, low company car
tax, rear legroom is ok, not too
bad a spec for an entry level BMW, I forgot IPod interface is good if you buy the # 8 ebay lead or the # 68 BMW one Cons: Noisy rough engine, If you have your hand on the gear shift when it restarts it will whip your wrist off, gutless even
in sport mode, nothing as standard, if your used to a Ford or VW (no split seats, no ski slot, no heated mirrors, no leather wheel, no storage space, seat adjustment last seen on a Datsun 120y (yes I am that old) uncomfortable seats.
waste of italian
tax payer money only, u knwo la now italian
economy is
in very
bad shape n yet they still have to feed these alfa romeo cronies for the sake of price?
(This is
bad insofar as you accept the position that high
taxes damage the
economy in excess of the goals that the government uses them to achieve).
In my view (and I've seen energy and environment close up in every election since Pres. Nixon's rather revolutionary Environmental Message of the early 1970s == too bad there was that third rate break in to spoil his record) the tests for all the candidates will be whether they will substiture oil taxes for off - oil subsidies, carbon taxes to level the whole field, and then and only then decide where we need to push or pull a bit (like with the fuel economy standards, long over due, and boy will they take a long time to arrive in full force
In my view (and I've seen energy and environment close up
in every election since Pres. Nixon's rather revolutionary Environmental Message of the early 1970s == too bad there was that third rate break in to spoil his record) the tests for all the candidates will be whether they will substiture oil taxes for off - oil subsidies, carbon taxes to level the whole field, and then and only then decide where we need to push or pull a bit (like with the fuel economy standards, long over due, and boy will they take a long time to arrive in full force
in every election since Pres. Nixon's rather revolutionary Environmental Message of the early 1970s == too
bad there was that third rate break
in to spoil his record) the tests for all the candidates will be whether they will substiture oil taxes for off - oil subsidies, carbon taxes to level the whole field, and then and only then decide where we need to push or pull a bit (like with the fuel economy standards, long over due, and boy will they take a long time to arrive in full force
in to spoil his record) the tests for all the candidates will be whether they will substiture oil
taxes for off - oil subsidies, carbon
taxes to level the whole field, and then and only then decide where we need to push or pull a bit (like with the fuel
economy standards, long over due, and boy will they take a long time to arrive
in full force
in full force.)
The Carbon
Tax in Australia will be
worse and even companies like Stramit (owned by Fletchers) will decline
in value as steel will be economically priced out of the global
economy.
A robust carbon cap or
tax should put the
economy on a trajectory toward the science - based deep cuts
in emissions required to limit some of the
worst impacts of climate change.
We all hope the
worst of the housing crisis is behind us, but downturns of varying degrees regularly turn up
in commercial and residential real estate, influenced by the
economy, politics,
tax policies, and other forces.
The more you take
in taxes, the
worse the
economy gets.