Writing for the majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy said
taxpayers challenging the program lacked «standing» to continue the suit.
Several Arizona
taxpayers challenged the program, arguing that it impermissibly puts the government in the business of funding religious education.
Not exact matches
They suggested three ways in which RFRA might conceivably be interpreted (misinterpreted, really) to create bad consequences: (1) to give a church's opponents legal «standing» (a technical term meaning the right to sue) to
challenge the church's tax - exempt status; (2) to allow
taxpayers to claim their free exercise rights would be violated if a religiously affiliated organization receives government assistance under a secular
program; and, most importantly, (3) to allow pro-abortion plaintiffs to claim a free exercise right to abortion if Roe v. Wade is overruled and states enact anti-abortion laws.
«The fact that (those
challenging the
program) are state
taxpayers does not give them standing to
challenge the subsidies that (the
program) provides to religious STOs.»
AMHERST, N.Y. — Gov. Andrew Cuomo maintains his START - UP NY
program is creating thousands of jobs at no cost to
taxpayers, even as legislators in Albany are
challenging the premise.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo maintains his START - UP NY
program is creating thousands of jobs at no cost to
taxpayers, even as legislators in Albany are
challenging the premise.
CSEA also pointed out the Empire Center's hypocrisy in
challenging public employee health care coverage at a time when many irresponsible businesses benefit at
taxpayer expense under
programs like Family Health Plus and Child Health Plus.
Al Coppola and Charles Swanick stated that the
program would be an unfair
challenge to legal residents and an unnecessary burden on
taxpayers.
«I find it deeply troubling that while our country is facing fiscal
challenges of gigantic proportions... that
programs such as this are being funded on the back of the American
taxpayer,» he said in offering his amendment on 29 May.
A group of state
taxpayers has
challenged the
programs, enacted by the state legislature in 1984 and 1985, as violating the clauses in the New York State and United States constitutions that bar government establishment of religion.
Following passage of a school voucher
program in Indiana back in 2011,
taxpayers represented by the National Education Association
challenged that law all the way to the Indiana Supreme Court.
A second suit brought by a coalition of
taxpayer groups also
challenged the
program, claiming that the Nevada Constitution requires the legislature to set apart money to be used to fund the operation of public schools «to the exclusion of all other purposes.»
Attorney Burton Craige, who represents plaintiffs
challenging the voucher
program, told N.C. Policy Watch last week that releasing
taxpayer funds prior to the court ruling is troubling.
Today, POLITICO cited a release from the U.S. House Education and Workforce Committee Democrats that claimed Florida's Tax Credit Scholarship
Program «has faced many problems, including constitutional
challenges in the courts, vast opposition by parents and civil rights organizations, fraud and corruption» and was a «waste of
taxpayer funds.»
The North Carolina Association of Educators and the North Carolina School Boards Association have
challenged the school voucher
program in court, alleging that the
program is an unconstitutional use of
taxpayer funds that should be used for public schools only.
A Tallahassee judge dismissed their case last year, after finding the groups could not show the
program harmed public schools and did not have standing as
taxpayers to
challenge its constitutionality.
The United States» federal coal leasing
program has come under increased scrutiny in recent years, as communities impacted by coal mining and export proposals,
taxpayer advocates, and environmental groups have questioned the ability of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to ensure a fair return to US
taxpayers and adjust to newer
challenges such as climate change and coal export proposals.