Sentences with phrase «teach a class there»

He still teaches a class there.

I teach classes there.

WWW's Shari Stauch is teaching a class there on Friday afternoon (learn more at scbookfestival.org/schedule/workshops/), and WWW's booth, one of over 100 festival exhibitors, will include some surprise Show Specials during show hours on Saturday and Sunday.

Samm, my teacher while at the Viceroy Riviera Maya (he teaches classes there daily at 10 am, except Saturday), was an excellent guide who pushed me to deepen my practice.

Not exact matches

«If you're where the start - ups are, you'd never think there was a recession,» says Yael Hochberg, an economist who teaches classes on venture capital and entrepreneurship at Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management.

From there, I do what I do best — which is teaching fitness classes, marketing my business, and continuing to develop the bigger picture.

There are millions of books, classes, case studies, and, yes, even magazine articles that are supposed to teach CEOs everything about how to improve their businesses.

But according to Dr. J. Wesley Boyd, a psychiatrist who teaches at Harvard Medical School, there's a whole other class of users, which he terms «almost addicted,» and they might be working at your company.

I never put my name on the door of our yoga studio and only taught one or two classes a week once we were fully staffed because I knew I wanted to have the option to sell it one day, and for it to be sellable, it needed to be valuable without me being there.»

But there are useful classes for financial professionals, especially newly promoted controllers, who might benefit from intensive exposure to state - of - the - art cash forecasting, budgeting, and financial - reporting systems (taught in Seminar 1206QGF, The Controller's Job in Today's Environment).

If you have a fear of associating with people, you have to go out there and do it, and it's painful... When I was young and completed the [public speaking] course, I was worried I would lapse back... so I started teaching a class at night and, you know, you've got to force yourself to do some things sometimes.»

GREENBLATT: Well you know I taught at Columbia as I mentioned for the last 22 years and so I tell my students that first day of class actually, I tell them that you know I don't think there's a lot of social value in being an investment manager, it's not that I don't think investors who do work set help set prices and allocate capital and all those things, but I just think A, they're not very good at it, and B, it'll get done without you.

With online training there are NO travel costs, you can LEARN from anywhere, and it's the SAME information that is taught in our face - to - face class!

There are classes taught on the nature of light.

There is NO requirement that a comparative religion class be taught by some foolish dolt like you just because he / she believes.

Religion has no place there, just like algebra shouldn't be taught in a history class, or French verb conjugation in a music class.

But there are numerous problems with thinking that doctrinal statements and membership classes can keep false teaching out of the church.

The arrest took place days before Byle was set to teach a class to a group of Turks on how to tell people about the gospel, though there was no public indication of a link between the arrest and the scheduled training.

Even a few years ago when I was teaching in a Catholic school, a teacher there (a nun) used to tell the class they were damned and going to hell just because they talked during the lesson!

He is now a volunteer who teaches a jobs class for the men's recovery program there.

Then explain to me why there is a push to teach creationism and / or intelligent design in public school science classes?

There is a difference between the two, and Creationism should be taught in a religious class.

I know there are a lot of things I was taught in history class as a young child that the school «left out» very important facts.

Some challenge specific parts of the curriculum (mandatory AIDS education, New York City's distribution of condoms to schoolchildren without the knowledge or consent of the parents, textbooks that propagate anti-Christian doctrines, gym - class dress requirements at odds with the modest dress required of Hindu, Muslim, and other children, «values clarification» classes that teach that there is no objective source of right and wrong, and so forth).

Oh there is plenty of negativity around, atheists don't have a corner on that; — RRB -... the loving, kind, altruistic atheists aren't posting on discussion boards; they're reading to kids, planting trees, teaching classes, cleaning up litter, rescuing dogs and rivers and forests and bad neighborhoods.

just as a comment about those who think athiests are smarter than christians... There's a guy in my church who works as a rocket engineer but also serves in our church teaching bible classes and leading a home fellowship.

I remember in English class when they taught the word «you» does NOT always need to be present / used / said to be understood it's there.

Additionally, the «teach that your religion is better than another person's,»... Well as a person who had to take a women's study and leisure class and also a psychology class taught by a known feminist, I will report to you there is enough «I am better than you» just within the same classes.

There are also those religious professionals who supposedly have had all the theology, Greek and Hebrew classes offered in seminary who also seem to find their own version of crazy stuff in the Bible, and teach it to their congregations.

I was there to teach a class last year, and one day I spent an afternoon alone in the chapel with the banner, contemplating its message and power.

I didn't enjoy all my classes at seminary, but the one who taught me the truths about how to understand Genesis (Dr. Gordon Johnston) was one of my favorite profs there.

The constant teaching of the Catholic Church supports the idea that there are two classes: the saved and the damned.

But anyone who reads it as some proclamation that all regulation should fall away should take a trip to their high school english class and let the kids there teach you something...

And in his teachings there is little about the evils of belonging to the class of the rich at the expense of the poor.

On Saturday, well, you know... I would like to go over there today, but I'm teaching the adult Sunday School class tomorrow, and I have to prepare for it.

This film was shown in the Bible classes in the school where I teach — Encina High, Sacramento — when, in 1973, we introduced a Bible course there as a junior - senior nine - week literature elective.

«There's no silencing of Sister Farley in the notification, there's no threat to her membership in her religious community; it's just about the book, which everyone agrees probably shouldn't be taught in Catholic seminaries, certainly shouldn't be taught in religious education classes for young perThere's no silencing of Sister Farley in the notification, there's no threat to her membership in her religious community; it's just about the book, which everyone agrees probably shouldn't be taught in Catholic seminaries, certainly shouldn't be taught in religious education classes for young perthere's no threat to her membership in her religious community; it's just about the book, which everyone agrees probably shouldn't be taught in Catholic seminaries, certainly shouldn't be taught in religious education classes for young persons.

The central point of the Christian Faith is the indissoluble link between God and man, expressed through Christ; man is free to choose either good or evil; God's purpose is to bring all men into the right relationship with himself; and in the teaching of Christ there is neither class distinction, color bar, nor discrimination between the sexes.

??? There is a Luther movie, not the last one, where he is in class with his students at the University of Wittenberg and he teaches the freedom in Christ, and the students are disturbed about it.

There have been great milestones along the way; becoming a NYT bestselling author, teaching big classes, things like that, but in the end what brings me happiness is knowing I am on the right path.

She teaches classes in French pastry and Jewish cooking there and around the country.

I spent 2 weeks in Morocco this past summer and ate tagine pretty much everyday and took a cooking class at a local women's center there that is focused on teaching cooking skills to underprivileged women and we learned how to make a lamb tagine!

I took a class teaching me how to make my own chocolate bars at home, from whole beans to finished bar (dangerous, dangerous for us chocolate lovers out there), and I even learned about email marketing from a Mailchimp executive.

The longer I work with food, teach cooking classes and eat, the more I know there is no bad food.

When I was a kid there was an elderly lady, Mrs. Burkheiser, who taught «Little House on the Prairie Classes» in her basement.

Long story short, I've been practicing ashtanga there since January and the program director asked me to teach a Hatha class on Tuesdays at 9AM.

Some afternoons, I'd head over to Northeastern University to shoot pool and maybe drop in on the pastry class that Susan taught there.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Walcot is a must due to the excessive wge he is eating up.ox ill say let him hve another go for the money.some guys saying iwobi will not get playing time but I believe having world class wingers is essential in a squad coz young players learn from them.so its gud for all our youth if the names we linked with cme, there some things u can't be taught in the academy

In fact, there's so much more to essential oils than just aromatherapy (and I teach all about safe and effective uses for essential oils in my Facebook classes)!